FDA asks federal judge to seal Pfizer vaccine data for 55 years

[Ame®icano]

And according to your link, it won't change....the 500 a month, per customer requesting FOIA information is normal procedure so that all customers filing FOIAs have the same access to govt information. This dept has 7 employees, plus 2 trainees, to service the entire nation's FOIA requests.

THESE so called renowned scientists that the Daily Caller claims to have to analyze all the info, need to narrow down their request, they need to prioritize what they need to determine the vaccines safety.

The 1967 FOIA law requires federal agencies to respond to FOIAs within 20 days unless “unusual circumstances” exist that prevent a timely release. Circumstances that might warrant an extended release schedule include: Instances where response records must be searched for and collected from an entity other than the office processing the request, situations involving “voluminous” amounts of records that must be compiled, and instances requiring consultation with another federal agency that has a substantial interest in the information.

While it's true that they only have 10 employees assigned to FOIA releases, they also have 18,000 employees and budget of $6 billion, they should be able to handle it. Why? Well, between 2008 and 2017, the agency processed 114,938 FOIA requests, of which it granted 72.4%, either fully or partially. Of those, 39.8% were designated as “complex,” and 81.5% of these complex FOIA requests were granted in 61 days or more. Considering these historical statistics, a backlog of 400 FOIA requests they claim to have, doesn’t really appear excessively burdensome.

 

[gipper]

And according to your link, it won't change....the 500 a month, per customer requesting FOIA information is normal procedure so that all customers filing FOIAs have the same access to govt information. This dept has 7 employees, plus 2 trainees, to service the entire nation's FOIA requests.

THESE so called renowned scientists that the Daily Caller claims to have to analyze all the info, need to narrow down their request, they need to prioritize what they need to determine the vaccines safety.

Are you defending the FDA’s request for 75 years?

 

[Care4all]

Are you defending the FDA’s request for 75 years?

Yes, of course I am. If you read the court papers, you would understand why!!!!

 

[gipper]

Yes, of course I am. If you read the court papers, you would understand why!!!!

Oh my. I don’t care what the court papers say. It took the FDA less than four months to approve the Pfizer vax, yet they need 75 years before releasing all the data. Why does this not concern you?

 

[Ame®icano]

Yes, of course I am. If you read the court papers, you would understand why!!!!

The entire purpose of the FOIA is to assure government transparency. It is difficult to imagine a greater need for transparency than disclosure of the documents relied upon by the FDA to license a product that is now being mandated to over 100 million Americans under penalty of losing their careers, their income, their military service status, and far worse.

It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine. Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure.

Licensing the vaccine is far more intricate, and detailed task than redacting the names of test subjects and patented information, and it took FDA just 108 days to complete that. Two months after FOIA, FDA released first batch of just 91 pages, and after seeing the data, it's not surprise why they're trying to slow walk the rest. What you're saying you don't really want to know, as quickly is possible, based on what they approved the vaccine, how bad are results they're hiding that Pfizer was firing people over for talking about it, and that you're willing to wait 55, or 75 years for them to disclose it.

You probably think you're smart woman...

 

[Care4all]

Oh my. I don’t care what the court papers say. It took the FDA less than four months to approve the Pfizer vax, yet they need 75 years before releasing all the data. Why does this not concern you?

The request as it stands is casting an impossible very wide net, that mostly has nothing to do with the vaccine approval itself.

The people suing, need to prioritized and request the information they need....to verify the vaccine is safe....they don't need the private names of the 43000 trial participants, as an example....

The term, burdensome FOIA request for the agency, is one for 20,000+ pages ...

Over 500,000 pages to go through and remove personal information of the trial participants etc, that have now been requested is not a burdensome request, it is a batshit CRAZY and impossible request....

They need to have their renown scientists they claim they have to analyze the data for the vaccine, narrow their bull shit request for every piece of paper that ever existed that pfizer sent to the FDA, DOWN to the actual scientific information they need to analyze the verification of the vaccine's safety.

The Daily Caller request was too too too broad, and literally absurd. They knew it, when they requested it....

 

[Care4all]

The entire purpose of the FOIA is to assure government transparency. It is difficult to imagine a greater need for transparency than disclosure of the documents relied upon by the FDA to license a product that is now being mandated to over 100 million Americans under penalty of losing their careers, their income, their military service status, and far worse.

It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine. Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure.

Licensing the vaccine is far more intricate, and detailed task than redacting the names of test subjects and patented information, and it took FDA just 108 days to complete that. Two months after FOIA, FDA released first batch of just 91 pages, and after seeing the data, it's not surprise why they're trying to slow walk the rest. What you're saying you don't really want to know, as quickly is possible, based on what they approved the vaccine, how bad are results they're hiding that Pfizer was firing people over for talking about it, and that you're willing to wait 55, or 75 years for them to disclose it.

You probably think you're smart woman...

The FDA has a lot of scientists....thousands of them throughout the nation. But they only have 7 trained FOIA specialists, plus 2 more that are still in training, and 1 supervisor.

No, they can not take Scientists and lab techs and medical technologists away from their jobs to be FOIA specialists. That's a bizarre request!

 

[gipper]

The request as it stands is casting an impossible very wide net, that mostly has nothing to do with the vaccine approval itself.

The people suing, need to prioritized and request the information they need....to verify the vaccine is safe....they don't need the private names of the 43000 trial participants, as an example....

The term, burdensome FOIA request for the agency, is one for 20,000+ pages ...

Over 500,000 pages to go through and remove personal information of the trial participants etc, that have now been requested is not a burdensome request, it is a batshit CRAZY and impossible request....

They need to have their renown scientists they claim they have to analyze the data for the vaccine, narrow their bull shit request for every piece of paper that ever existed that pfizer sent to the FDA, DOWN to the actual scientific information they need to analyze the verification of the vaccine's safety.

The Daily Caller request was too too too broad, and literally absurd. They knew it, when they requested it....

You’re missing the forest for the trees and choosing to side with a corrupt state.

Did you miss the fact that SUPPOSEDLY the FDA reviewed those hundreds of thousands of pages of documents in something like 108 days, yet they can’t disclose this data to the American people for 75 years? If you think this acceptable, you’ll do well in our Orwellian dystopian future.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Oh my. I don’t care what the court papers say. It took the FDA less than four months to approve the Pfizer vax, yet they need 75 years before releasing all the data. Why does this not concern you?

I have no words for people who are defending the FDA needing 75 years to release data. It just shows that there is no contortion that they will not do to continue the lie and deceit.

 

[Briss]

The scam being perpetrated by government, big pharma, old media, and NGOs is enormous and transparent, yet millions of Americans can’t or won’t believe it. The numerous lies and inconsistencies should be enough, but it isn’t.

People are used to the idea of government taking care of bullies for them. But now, the government is the bully. There's nothing in the peoples' playbook to deal with that problem. Obey, or be bullied . . .

 

[LordBrownTrout]

People are used to the idea of government taking care of bullies for them. But now, the government is the bully. There's nothing in the peoples' playbook to deal with that problem. Obey, or be bullied . . .

Our govt is a clear and present danger to this country.

 

[badger2]

What series of illnesses does the future hold for the shot takers

Good question. We think one post-vax symptom of forced production of Chinese virus parts rather than the real, entire virus (mRNA) is diarrhea, so we’re now examining the spike protein sequences of alpaca, pig, and other animals for clues.

 

[badger2]

The entire purpose of the FOIA is to assure government transparency. It is difficult to imagine a greater need for transparency than disclosure of the documents relied upon by the FDA to license a product that is now being mandated to over 100 million Americans under penalty of losing their careers, their income, their military service status, and far worse.

It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine. Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure.

Licensing the vaccine is far more intricate, and detailed task than redacting the names of test subjects and patented information, and it took FDA just 108 days to complete that. Two months after FOIA, FDA released first batch of just 91 pages, and after seeing the data, it's not surprise why they're trying to slow walk the rest. What you're saying you don't really want to know, as quickly is possible, based on what they approved the vaccine, how bad are results they're hiding that Pfizer was firing people over for talking about it, and that you're willing to wait 55, or 75 years for them to disclose it.

You probably think you're smart woman...

But the major burden of the lack of transparency rests with the communist Chinese from SARS-CoV-1. Their gayer-than-gay sloth and irresponsibility is theirs and theirs alone: there are no documents, FOIA or otherwise, showing that they found the focus of the first virus in civets or raccoon dogs. There is your tumor.

 

[Flopper]

The scam being perpetrated by government, big pharma, old media, and NGOs is enormous and transparent, yet millions of Americans can’t or won’t believe it. The numerous lies and inconsistencies should be enough, but it isn’t.

Can't trust anybody can you big pharma, big goverment, big media

 

[gipper]

Can't trust anybody can you big pharma, big goverment, big media

It’s evident but many like you can’t or won’t accept it.

 

[Flopper]

The 1967 FOIA law requires federal agencies to respond to FOIAs within 20 days unless “unusual circumstances” exist that prevent a timely release. Circumstances that might warrant an extended release schedule include: Instances where response records must be searched for and collected from an entity other than the office processing the request, situations involving “voluminous” amounts of records that must be compiled, and instances requiring consultation with another federal agency that has a substantial interest in the information.

While it's true that they only have 10 employees assigned to FOIA releases, they also have 18,000 employees and budget of $6 billion, they should be able to handle it. Why? Well, between 2008 and 2017, the agency processed 114,938 FOIA requests, of which it granted 72.4%, either fully or partially. Of those, 39.8% were designated as “complex,” and 81.5% of these complex FOIA requests were granted in 61 days or more. Considering these historical statistics, a backlog of 400 FOIA requests they claim to have, doesn’t really appear excessively burdensome.

It seems to me that the requestors could narrow their request, 365,000 pages is a bit much. Years ago, I worked for a government agency where we got a number of requests for information, mostly from newspapers. Generally, they would ask for specific documents which we provide within a couple of days. On rare occasions we got an open ended request for many thousands of pages which we had to find then run the information through legal to make sure we were not disclosing information that could not legally be disclose, which took weeks. That in itself became a story. Once they got the information, meetings were requested to ask questions and that was denied by legal. That became the next story. To my knowledge nothing illegal was ever uncovered but the public was left with that assumption by the media.

I suspect the same thing is happing here. They are on a fishing trip and have cast a net so large the agency can not possibly fulfill the request in a timely manner. And that becomes the story, violation of FOIA with suggestions of a coverup which become the basis for many stories of unsafe vaccines, fraud, and lies created by social media.

 

[eagle1462010]

Who's they? The govt gets the 75 cents per vaccine, not the drug makers??

The vaccine court. But that was sent to the other branch. Compensation branch. Which basically NEVER PAYS.......Think 28 pay outs since 2010. Nice huh.......

Pharma owns them.

 

[MisterBeale]

Well if that ain't a big red flag.

"The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.

As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency” with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming “the FDA’s commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this country’s most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.

The FDA’s response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.

Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076. The FDA’s promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions..."

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data

This will, in short, blow your mind away. It won't, of course, be covered in the cabal owned media.

Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release​

The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years​

Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release

The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years

celiafarber.substack.com

". . . Most smoking guns are not really smoking guns, but this one is.

A group called “Public Health and Medical Professionals For Transparency Documents” sued the FDA for the release of Pfizer’s documents concerning adverse events from their Covid “vaccine”, which Pfizer fought to have concealed 55 years, but a courageous judge ordered them released anyway.

They wrote on their website:
”Four days after the Pfizer vaccine was approved for ages 16+, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act Request to the FDA for all of the data within Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine biological product file. We have now sued the FDA for not releasing the data. Click below for court documents and for productions of Pfizer’s documents from the FDA.”

Link: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

My God

In the 90 days following EUA release of the “vaccine” they recorded 1223 deaths, and 158,000 adverse reactions, including fetal deaths, spontaneous abortions and more. They call this, in their encrypted, trans-human Pharma-lingo, the “post marketing experience.” [See link above]. . "

<snip>

". . . And this is a fate worse, they make clear, than death.

But no need to believe “anti-vaxxers” anymore—here’s the data from Pfizer, of everything these predators have “observed” in their victims, whose lives they are ostensibly so insistent upon “saving” and who were healthy before the shots, but spellbound by fear, and sacrificed by an unspeakably cold-blooded media:"

There are eight pages of adverse affects. . . including, by the way, AIDS.

 

[gipper]

This will, in short, blow your mind away. It won't, of course, be covered in the cabal owned media.

Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release​

The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years​

Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release

The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years

celiafarber.substack.com

". . . Most smoking guns are not really smoking guns, but this one is.

A group called “Public Health and Medical Professionals For Transparency Documents” sued the FDA for the release of Pfizer’s documents concerning adverse events from their Covid “vaccine”, which Pfizer fought to have concealed 55 years, but a courageous judge ordered them released anyway.

They wrote on their website:
”Four days after the Pfizer vaccine was approved for ages 16+, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act Request to the FDA for all of the data within Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine biological product file. We have now sued the FDA for not releasing the data. Click below for court documents and for productions of Pfizer’s documents from the FDA.”

Link: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

My God

In the 90 days following EUA release of the “vaccine” they recorded 1223 deaths, and 158,000 adverse reactions, including fetal deaths, spontaneous abortions and more. They call this, in their encrypted, trans-human Pharma-lingo, the “post marketing experience.” [See link above]. . "

<snip>

". . . And this is a fate worse, they make clear, than death.

But no need to believe “anti-vaxxers” anymore—here’s the data from Pfizer, of everything these predators have “observed” in their victims, whose lives they are ostensibly so insistent upon “saving” and who were healthy before the shots, but spellbound by fear, and sacrificed by an unspeakably cold-blooded media:"

There are eight pages of adverse affects. . . including, by the way, AIDS.

Nothing surprises me anymore. I don’t know what that says about me.

This is all so appalling as to be unbelievable. We as a nation are willingly walking into the trap of totalitarianism. A trap set for us by the oligarchy.

 

[Ame®icano]