AllieBaba
Rookie
- Oct 2, 2007
- 33,778
- 3,927
- 0
- Banned
- #121
So if someone is certain 100% another person will die, them making their death painless a couple days before rather than a slow painful death deserves calling them a murderer?
Some people will stoop to saying anything to defend the beliefs of their bureacrats.
Er..yes.
Becaue what you propose is euthanasia. It's murdering people before their time on the ass backwards assumption you're doing THEM a favor.
BTW, I'm 100 percent certain that you are going to die.
May I off you now? Save you the grief I know is coming to you?
Lol simply amazing.
Craziest comparison I've ever read.
Are you against medically induced comas? Why not let the person wake up, scream in agony until they die, God would probably prefer that instead of messing with his big plan with silly doctor work.
The purpose of a medically induced coma isn't the patient's death, you brain dead loon.
And it's not a crazy comparison at all. Your original (and stupid) comment is crazy though:
"So if someone is certain 100% another person will die, them making their death painless a couple days before rather than a slow painful death deserves calling them a murderer?"
I'm 100 percent certain you are going to die.
Does that justify killing you? That's your standard, not mine.