P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,921
Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
- Thread starter P F Tinmore
- Start date
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,922
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,923
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,924
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,925
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,926
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,927
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,928
RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: Ceasefire
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
It is getting pretty tiresome for people to suggest that Israel is rejecting a legitimate and good-faith ceasefire. The Islamic Resistance (including the participating Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighters) offer up a ceasefire with terms mandated as if the Islamic Resistance has the upper hand in the conflict. It should be the case that the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) (The Islamic Resistance, et al) should be the side that makes the biggest concessions. It was the HoAP that opened hostilities with the surprise attack of last October.
The Surprise Attack by the Islamic Resistance (including the participating Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighters) on 7 October is how we got here.
And it is a very poor proposal that the Israelis are being forced to capitulate and to pay the blackmail, submit to the greater demands, and to be humbled in the face of the Islamic Resistance. Proceeding with such a plan demonstrates to the world that the strategy of the Islamic Resistance will win against the Jewish State. It demonstrates that the Islamic Resistance (terrorist) strategy of ignoring the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is the new approach to low-intensity conflicts /is the successful approach.
Do we want that as the message?
Most Respectfully,
R
.
SUBTOPIC: Ceasefire
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
(TRUNCATED COMMENT)
It is getting pretty tiresome for people to suggest that Israel is rejecting a legitimate and good-faith ceasefire. The Islamic Resistance (including the participating Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighters) offer up a ceasefire with terms mandated as if the Islamic Resistance has the upper hand in the conflict. It should be the case that the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) (The Islamic Resistance, et al) should be the side that makes the biggest concessions. It was the HoAP that opened hostilities with the surprise attack of last October.
The Surprise Attack by the Islamic Resistance (including the participating Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighters) on 7 October is how we got here.
And it is a very poor proposal that the Israelis are being forced to capitulate and to pay the blackmail, submit to the greater demands, and to be humbled in the face of the Islamic Resistance. Proceeding with such a plan demonstrates to the world that the strategy of the Islamic Resistance will win against the Jewish State. It demonstrates that the Islamic Resistance (terrorist) strategy of ignoring the Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is the new approach to low-intensity conflicts /is the successful approach.
Do we want that as the message?
Most Respectfully,
R
.
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,930
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,931
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,932
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,933
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,934
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,935
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,936
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,937
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,938
P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 83,145
- 4,673
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #5,939
RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
SUBTOPIC: What is the Connection?
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Ignoratio elenchi
This is Grand Standing.
On the matter of "Genocide." I can not assume that the Principle Allied Powers of 70 to 100 years ago that incorporated the concept of "Genocide" into the law used logic and made associations back then as do the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) make today in their propaganda.
Another point to be made here is the credibility of those who profess to fight in the name of the law, yet are crooks and criminals themselves → and are designated terrorists having started conflicts and refused to argue for peace, who have initiated hostile fire from behind unarmed constituent civilians (men, women, and children) and then cry foul when their innocent constituent (protected civilians) are killed and injured because the Islamic Resistance (terrorists) have no regard for the lives of the innocent and the lives of the Islamic Followers that use as human shields.
From the other perspective, The President may in point of fact, not win re-election, but it is unreasonable to assume that it is because the terrorists believe that the fight to neutralize the Islamic Resistance → the designated terrorists (Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighters) is considered "genocide."
Most Respectfully,
R
SUBTOPIC: What is the Connection?
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Ignoratio elenchi
(COMMENT)
This is Grand Standing.
On the matter of "Genocide." I can not assume that the Principle Allied Powers of 70 to 100 years ago that incorporated the concept of "Genocide" into the law used logic and made associations back then as do the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) make today in their propaganda.
Another point to be made here is the credibility of those who profess to fight in the name of the law, yet are crooks and criminals themselves → and are designated terrorists having started conflicts and refused to argue for peace, who have initiated hostile fire from behind unarmed constituent civilians (men, women, and children) and then cry foul when their innocent constituent (protected civilians) are killed and injured because the Islamic Resistance (terrorists) have no regard for the lives of the innocent and the lives of the Islamic Followers that use as human shields.
From the other perspective, The President may in point of fact, not win re-election, but it is unreasonable to assume that it is because the terrorists believe that the fight to neutralize the Islamic Resistance → the designated terrorists (Jihadists, Fedayeen Activists, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Resistance Fighters) is considered "genocide."
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said:
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said:
Most Respectfully,
R
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
illegal alien fined $1.82 million, $500 for every day in the US after removal order
- Started by scruffy
- Replies: 0
-
