Erasing The Past

[PoliticalChic]

Historical revisionism that changes a regional North/South issue into modern political patronage.

Slavery existed in the south for 200 years before the Democratic Party was formed. To claim that slavery was somehow the fault of either modern political party is pure deception

It exposes the pure evil of Republicanism and white supremacy.

Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.


"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST



I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.


The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.


Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."
I bet you can't name any Republican officeholder who stands for the bogus 'white supremacy.'

 

[Mac1958]

Continuing a myth is changing history

The Trumpsters see what's happening, so they're desperate to change the subject.

They think the country won't see them denying the obvious white racism that still exists if they change the subject to history.

They think the country will forget that Trump has virtually ALL of the White Nationalist / Separatist / Supremacist vote if they change the subject to history.

This is good. Let them keep trying.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I just proved that the USAToday claim is a lie.

And, no, the old Democrats are the new Democrats/


Two-term Democrat Clinton was always a racist.

Did you vote for him?

Why should any black person ever vote for a party that's actively engaged in suppressing their votes?

Another false charge.



Let's go over why you should vote Democrat........
Democrat’s Bountiful Gifts To Out Black Brethren

1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.

2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.

3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.

4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.

5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years

6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.

7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.

8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro


9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.

10. But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.

 

[MarcATL]

Are you denying the fact that Republicans are actively suppressing the black vote?

 

[MarcATL]

All blacks should be single-issue voters. Starting with the issue of voter suppression. If a party is engaging in it, that's a non-starter.

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. The Democrat full court press against the truth is far from new. They learned it from their predecessors, the Bolsheviks.


Lest one think that Winston Smith's occupation isn't a real one, you should become acquainted with Victor Kravchenko, captain in the Red Army. And the first Soviet “defector.”
On April 1, 1944, Victor Kravchenko left Washington for New York, where, at a press conference arranged by the NYTimes, he revealed the truth about the Soviet Union. Two years later he published “I Chose Freedom,” which played a crucial role in the formation of public opinion in the formation of the incipient Cold War. Defectors like Kravchenko faced the same sort of barrage that McCarthy did later…and for the same reasons.


b. Kravcheko revealed that the Communists did then, and the Democrats do now, in reality what Smith did in the novel. He wrote in "I Chose Freedom,"....
."Shamelessly, without so much as an explanation, it revised half a century of Russian history. I don't mean simply that it falsified some facts or gave a new interpretation of events. I mean that it deliberately stood history on its head, expunging events and inventing facts.

It twisted the recent past--a past still fresh in millions of memories--into new and bizarre shapes, to conform with the version of affairs presented by the blood-purge trials and the accompanying propaganda... The roles of leading historical figures were perverted or altogether erased.... More than that, living witnesses, as far as possible, were removed. The directing staff of the Institute of Marx, Engels and Lenin in Moscow, repository of ideological truth, were removed and the more important people among them imprisoned or shot.

The "new history" became possible. To brand the shame more deeply on our minds, "study" of the new version was made obligatory for all responsible Party people. History classes met nearly every night in this period and lecturers from Sverdlovsk came to our town to help hammer home the lies, while most of us fumed inwardly.

Whatever human dignity remained in our character was humiliated.. But even the most gigantic lie, by dint of infinite repetition, takes root; Stalin knew this before Hitler discovered it. As I looked on I could see terrible falsehoods, at first accepted under pressure, become established as unquestioned "facts," particularly among younger people without personal experience to the contrary to bother them."
Text collection



Democrat ‘fact checkers’......the same paradigm: "...become established as unquestioned "facts,"

 

[Jets]

Revisionist history is fascinating....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you denying the fact that Republicans are actively suppressing the black vote?

Can you really be this stupid????


You might find this informative:

“The findings of this analysis suggest that voter identification requirements, such as requiring non-photo and photo identification, have virtually no suppressive effect on reported voter turnout.

Controlling for factors that influence voter turn¬out, states with stricter voter identification laws largely do not have the claimed negative impact on voter turnout when compared to states with more lenient voter identification laws.

Based on the Eagleton Institute's findings, some members of the media have claimed that voter identification law suppress voter turnout, especially among minorities.[80] Their conclusion is unfounded. When statistically significant and negative relationships are found in our analysis, the effects are so small that the findings offer little policy significance.

More important, minority respondents in states that required photo identification are just as likely to report voting as are minority respondents from states that only required voters to say their name.”

For a thorough statistical analysis of the effect of voter identification requirements:
New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

New Analysis Shows Voter Identification Laws Do Not Reduce Turnout

You may find information about the Eagleton Institution here:
Eagleton Institute of Politics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[MarcATL]

You are not only a FOOL PoliticalChic , but you're a partisan hack of a fool.

Total dishonesty.

 

[PoliticalChic]

All blacks should be single-issue voters. Starting with the issue of voter suppression. If a party is engaging in it, that's a non-starter.

What an ignorant post.


No one should vote at all who doesn't understand this:


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."



" Franklin Roosevelt had pictured a place where citizens were joined in a collective enterprise ... Reagan pictured a more individualistic America where everyone would flourish once freed from the shackles of the state, and so the watchwords became self-reliance and small government."
The Liberal Crackup
Get it now????

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are not only a FOOL PoliticalChic , but you're a partisan hack of a fool.

Total dishonesty.

Everything I post is linked, sources and documented.

You, on the other hand evince a palpable fear of thinking for yourself.

Indoctrination does that to the weak minded.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

So for some of the stuff they did their memory should be eradicated?

The Constitution is a document that outlines our freedoms, in fact, Thomas Jefferson wanted to include freeing slaves in the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson also outlawed most of the Alien and Sedition Acts that made it illegal to speak out against government. Can you imagine what the country would be like had he not risen up to get rid of those provisions? In fact, the provision that were still left, FDR used to lock up innocent Japanese Americans.

Actually, I really don't fault FDR for BRIEFLY detaining Japanese immigrants and citizens in 1942 (most of them were released by 1943.) The reality- the Axis found collaborators in every country they invaded, did you really want to leave 100K collaborators in a potential war zone.

Thomas Jefferson didn't include freeing the slaves in the DOI or the Constitution. That's the point. He personally benefitted from slavery and sexually abused a woman for years because she was his property (and happened to be his dead wife's half-sister because his father in law did the same kind of stuff.)

No one said "eradicate" his memory. But put him in a position of less honor? Maybe. Worth having the discussion, to be sure.

Then perhaps FDR should have detained all the German-Americans in camps too. After all they all posed a threat as collaborators in your mind. Do you think the United States would have won the war if he had followed that policy also? I doubt it because the United States would have been in the middle of another civil war the moment he tried since over fifty percent of this country was German-American at that time.

NOTE: I was friends with a Japanese-American who served the United States military during WWII so it appears you should be the last one to speak up on the subject of racism with your racist attitude.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Ooooh, noes, your white privilege is being assaulted...

Most of the statues being taken down are being taken down for a reason.

The only privilege I have been blessed with is a IQ 50 points higher than yours.


The stupid animals are vandalizing the statues of abolitionists just because they were white. You are a stupid animal so support it.

 

[JoeB131]

Quite a leap there. No, there is no defense of what FDR did.

Sure there was... It was war. At the same time FDR mildly inconvenienced Japanese Americans, Japanese were out there doing the Rape of Nanking and the Bataan Death March. Heck, he probably did them a favor. He got them away from people who were scared and angry.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Historical revisionism that changes a regional North/South issue into modern political patronage.

Slavery existed in the south for 200 years before the Democratic Party was formed. To claim that slavery was somehow the fault of either modern political party is pure deception

It exposes the pure evil of Republicanism and white supremacy.

I thought Obammy the brown turd was a Democrat and only had 1/2 white supremacy....

 

[JoeB131]

The only privilege I have been blessed with is a IQ 50 points higher than yours.

Dude, you are Corky the Retard compared to me, it's why I enjoy getting you so enraged all the time.

The stupid animals are vandalizing the statues of abolitionists just because they were white. You are a stupid animal so support it.

I'm really not getting worked up over statues, and if you are, you have too much time on your hands. If you guys really think 'Save the statues" is going to save Trump after he's wrecked the economy and killed 130,000 people, then you are daft.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I just proved that the USAToday claim is a lie.

And, no, the old Democrats are the new Democrats/


Two-term Democrat Clinton was always a racist.

Did you vote for him?

Why should any black person ever vote for a party that's actively engaged in suppressing their votes?

Do you think black on black murders in the inner cities, is suppressing the black vote?

 

[JoeB131]

The Trumpsters see what's happening, so they're desperate to change the subject.

They think the country won't see them denying the obvious white racism that still exists if they change the subject to history.

They think the country will forget that Trump has virtually ALL of the White Nationalist / Separatist / Supremacist vote if they change the subject to history.

This is good. Let them keep trying.

Weren't you the same Mitlaufer Mac who thought it was wonderful that Trump was challenging political correctness and sticking up for poor white people?

 

[Theowl32]

Remove the record of iniquity and one removes the stain, embarrassment, ability for good people to point fingers and avoid those with the ignoble history.



1.In so many ways, George Orwell foretold what we have been witnessing: ‘1984’ is the current Democrat control of society. Removing the statues, all of which are of Democrats, is just one aspect.
In the prescient novel, "1984," George Orwell's sort-of hero, Winston Smith, has the job "to overwrite the truth, to replace the history of what happened with a revised version. Winston enjoys his work and is good at it, yet at the same time he worries about the rewriting of history, and wants to know 'what really happened'."
Winston Smith s role in 1984



2. And that is exactly what is taking place: the Left is re-writing history in their image. They call them ‘fact checkers,’ but they are no more than one of the arms of the octopus called the International Left, or, in America, the Democrat Party.

“Fact check: Democratic Party did not found the KKK, did not start the Civil War” Fact check: Democratic Party did not found the KKK, did not start the Civil War

Here’s the ‘new truth,’ very different from the ‘real truth.”

The Democrats of the Confederacy didn’t start the Civil War.

The KKK was not the military arm of the Democrat Party.

The Democrats did not fight to preserve slavery.

The two parties switched their view of black folks mid-twentieth century.



The real truth was “rated false by PolitiFact and the Associated Press in October 2018…. historians say the party is not to blame.” Ibid.




And every one of the Democrat controlled disseminators of information follows the party line.

USA TODAY, "'You have to keep at it': What Black Lives Matter demonstrators can learn from civil rights protests of the past"

Princeton University Edwards Professor of American History Tera Hunter

NPR, "The Original Blexit"

YouTube, "The Daily Show with Trevor Noah"

PolitiFact, "No, the Democratic Party didn’t create the Ku Klux Klan"

Associated Press, "Ku Klux Klan not founded by the Democratic Party"

History.com, "Republican Party Founded"

Smithsonian National Museum of American History Curator Jon Grinspan

Khan Academy, "The First KKK"

Encyclopedia Britannica, "Ku Klux Klan"

These, and Comedy Central, are the sources of information for the savages who are taking over this country.



Can you see why I’m a pessimist about our future?

It's worse than erasing the past. The classic strategy of accuse accuse accuse by the devil's kingdom.

It isn't about erasing the past or about race issues. This is all cultural marxism strategy.

By "erasing the past" or drawing ATTENTION to erasing the past, they are DEMONIZING a group. In order to that they must prop up victims as innocent of EVERYTHING and nothing but VICTIMS.

Hence the reason black Americans think Europeans kidnapped Africans with nets and dragged them to America. For them, the Trans-Sahara slave trade didn't exist. For them the Barbary Coast slave trade where nearly 2 million Europeans were enslaved between the 15th and 19th centuries is irrelvant. All of that is KEPT from black Americans. That, along with many other reasons is why black Americans are an embarrassment to actual Africans who see black Americans as the spoiled privileged ones.

Growing up in the hood and living across the street from an actual African whose whole family was murdered by blood diamond warlords while he was at school was very beneficial to me. He spoke 6 languages and earned two doctorates. He looked at the blacks in our neighborhood with pity and that was in the 70s.

He yelled at me one time cause he saw I was being influenced by the gang element. He really cared about me and when he caught me vandalizing a car cause it was a Mercedes owned by a white person, he really let me have it. His eyes were filled with hurt, with anger and he let us BOYS know that we have no idea how good we have it living in America. How he could take us to a place where, "they would cut our heads right the fuck off and doesn't matter that we were kids." He explained to us how we live in the land of CHOICE.

He never turned us in for the vandalism of the car (which was a Doctor's car visiting someone dying of cancer.) However he said he would if he saw us again.

People have no fucking clue and white liberals are unreal racist losers and have no idea the damage they are doing and have done.

I fear it's permanent and our tolerance of their treachery is our unforgivable sin. We deserve what we get cause of our passivity.

 

[JustAGuy1]

You are not only a FOOL PoliticalChic , but you're a partisan hack of a fool.

Total dishonesty.

Lord, there is the pot calling the kettle black.