mikegriffith1
Mike Griffith
Which of Carter's endeavors is more important than his creating the Ayatollah's barbaric Iran? How many lives does that equate to?
It is easy for rabid partisans to paint Carter's actions toward Iran in a misleadingly negative light. The truth is far more complicated. We can start by noting that Carter was getting erroneous CIA reports that were assuring him there was no immediate danger of a radical revolution in Iran. Dr. Kai Bird discusses this in his outstanding, balanced biography The Outlier: The Unfinished Presidency of Jimmy Carter.
Also, Carter was by no means the only official who believed Khomeini's assurances that he would govern as a moderate, would continue to sell oil to the U.S., etc. CIA and State Department officials likewise viewed Khomeini as a moderate alternative to the Shah's unpopular government.
Yes, Khomeini double-crossed Carter and quickly imposed radical Muslim rule. Carter responded with severe sanctions, including freezing Iranian assets held in the U.S. and banning oil trade with Iran, which devastated Iran's economy. Perhaps this is why Iran's mullah-run government responded to the news of Carter's death with harsh condemnations of Carter, one of which said Carter "will rot in hell."