...........
Split from another thread.
Can anyone name an enemy of America where America didn't create that enemy through interference in that country or regional interference?
I've tried and I can't find one.
Anyone game to try?
There are distinct differences between
interference in a country and
regional interference. You evidently strung them together thinking it made for a better argument, when in reality it weakens your argument in many ways.
interference: Noun:
The action of interfering or the process of being interfered with: "interference in the country's internal affairs".
Regional
interference would be in the eye of the beholder, and therein lays a deep chasm of a flaw in your premise, so let us put that one aside and tackle the easy one first:
interference in a country: Nations have become the enemy of America without America having first interfered in those nation's internal affairs. If you do not acknowledge this, there is no sense in me continuing to engage you after this post
Now we tackle
regional interference: Regional
interference is in the eye of the beholder. America like most every nation on Earth has had interests in regional affairs close to home and far away. It is how the world works. America's interests in regional affairs world wide can and have run into conflict with the interests of other nations. How nations including America, choose to deal with these conflicts is where we can sort out who first chose viewing another nation as an enemy
As with politics, Dante has always said he views most people as opponents and enemies, even when some people would attempt to make an enemy of Dante.