Do you Believe Kavanaugh's Rape Accuser?

[Care4all]

Umm...it happened 36 years ago

It doesn't matter, it is a known fact that those abused, like the boys and girls by the Catholic Priests, hold in their trauma, for decades.... this is why the statute of limitations for felony sexual abuse of 5 to 10 years, are being removed by the States or are in the process of doing such.

But no one is asking for criminal charges, just the truth and what facts can be gathered to make an INFORMED decision on whether he should be seated as a SC Justice, for a lifetime, when they vote...

 

[chops_]

Umm...it happened 36 years ago

But no one is asking for criminal charges, just the truth and what facts can be gathered to make an INFORMED decision on whether he should be seated as a SC Justice, for a lifetime, when they vote...

Right, it doesn't matter 35 years later.
Criminal charges? What criminal charges? Did she even file one back then? If not, it's unsubstantial due to the statue of limitation expired. So what good would that even do for her now?

 

[S.J.]

One stall tactic after the other. They need more time to dig up another "victim" so they can say "Well well well, looks like Ford isn't the only victim". Watch and see.

 

[Foxfyre]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have bent over backwards to accommodate her. They have even offered more than once to travel to her for her testimony since it now appears she doesn’t like to fly.

They have given her five extensions, delayed the whole process, agreed to her demands over the number of cameras and to keep Kav out of the room so he is denied the right to even face his accuser.

There certainly are people playing games, but it isn’t republicans. You really are full of crap.

...Grassley wrote on Twitter that he had "just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed [with] the statement she made last week to testify to the senate."

The GOP chairman didn't specify how long of an extension he is giving Ford, but his announcement kicks the negotiations over a public hearing into at least Saturday.

Grassley wrote on Twitter that Ford "[should] decide so we can move on," adding, "I want to hear her."

He noted the Judiciary Committee had given Ford five extensions to decide if she wanted to meet with the Senate panel. ...

Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony. Come to us or we to u," Grassley added in a tweet....

Grassley extends deadline for Kavanaugh accuser to decide on testifying

Yep! And the Demo-frauds still say that the Republicans are rushing and she needs more time?

I even read that some liberals believe Ford is lying through her teeth and Kavanaugh should be quickly nominated. Wow! That is so unheard of these days. Lol

I don't know if she is lying and because I don't know would not presume to judge her.

But the following facts:

She gave the letter ONLY to Senator Feinstein with orders to keep her name anonymous.

She gave the letter to Feinstein in July who sat on it and told no one through all of the FBI background check, 65 different occasions Kavanaugh met with senators including Senator Feinstein, over 30 hours of testimony and addressing more than 2000 questions in public settings, more in private settings. And Feinstein brings up the letter on the eve of the scheduled confirmation vote?

Meanwhile the woman lawyers up with left wing activist lawyers and says she took a polygraph test?

Feinstein, the only one supposedly who knew the woman's name, obviously leaked the letter and name of the woman to the media after stating the woman wanted very much to be kept anonymous? These Democrats really care about women don't they.

Since then it has been delay, delay, delay by the woman and the Democrats who won't agree to a specific date to testify, have refused GOP offers for her to testify, and who are setting unprecedented demands for how she will testify?

. . .are all strong evidence of pure malicious political motivation or else I am Queen Elizabeth.

Kavanaugh should get his vote and be seated on the Supreme Court next week.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

, and there is the letter she sent to her congress women

That hasn't even been read by the senators. Something fishy is going on and it is clear to everyone but the zombie Dems

Grassley demands Feinstein turn over letter from Kavanaugh accuser: 'I cannot overstate how disappointed I am'

The Dems are definatley milking this for all its worth. The Reps are now playing the political games too and if this lady is telling the truth and she is a scarred abuse victim coming forward it is a very sad thing to see how are leaders and our country is acting... on both sides

No, if a CRIME has been committed 35 years ago (doesn't sound like it), there are things she should have done and still can. This is a complete farce. America is suffering real damage entertaining this nonsense.

 

[Slade3200]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have already postponed the vote for more than a couple of days and have bent over backwards to accommodate the accuser.
The FBI do not investigate what teens get up to at high school parties, they have met with her regarding the alleged threats.
Come on, there are certainly all kinds of games being played, but not by the republicans as you claim.

Yeah they have really bent over backwards, I’m surprise the poor fellows can still stand! Haha

 

[Tilly]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have already postponed the vote for more than a couple of days and have bent over backwards to accommodate the accuser.
The FBI do not investigate what teens get up to at high school parties, they have met with her regarding the alleged threats.
Come on, there are certainly all kinds of games being played, but not by the republicans as you claim.

Yeah they have really bent over backwards, I’m surprise the poor fellows can still stand! Haha

Lame, even for you, Slade.

 

[S.J.]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have already postponed the vote for more than a couple of days and have bent over backwards to accommodate the accuser.
The FBI do not investigate what teens get up to at high school parties, they have met with her regarding the alleged threats.
Come on, there are certainly all kinds of games being played, but not by the republicans as you claim.

Yeah they have really bent over backwards, I’m surprise the poor fellows can still stand! Haha

Lame, even for you, Slade.

He's pissed because he's getting his ass kicked all over this thread.

 

[Tilly]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have already postponed the vote for more than a couple of days and have bent over backwards to accommodate the accuser.
The FBI do not investigate what teens get up to at high school parties, they have met with her regarding the alleged threats.
Come on, there are certainly all kinds of games being played, but not by the republicans as you claim.

Yeah they have really bent over backwards, I’m surprise the poor fellows can still stand! Haha

You are totally dishonest to deny that they really have been very accommodating, particularly when the allegations are close to 40 years old, there is absolutley no evidence to support her claim, and that the only witnesses she cites have said they have no knowledge whatsoever of her accusation. You are now embarrassing yourself, imho.

We are committed to providing a secure and respectful setting for her testimony. The Chairman fully agrees with Dr. Ford that we cannot have another “media circus.” The Chairman has offered the ability for Dr. Ford to testify in an open session, a closed session, a public staff interview, and a private staff interview. The Chairman is even willing to fly female staff investigators to meet Dr. Ford and you in California, or anywhere else, to obtain Dr. Ford’s testimony.

Judiciary Committee Continues Effort to Accommodate Testimony from Dr. Ford Next Week | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

 

[Baz Ares]

Interesting that an admitted Orange ***** Grabber and now this new accused Kava ***** Grabber
needed a 9-hour White House meeting is it. To discuss/explain why this was not an assault by Kava ***** Grabber.

 

[Tilly]

Good point in bold:



....Yesterday, you issued ten demands to us regarding the conditions under which Dr. Ford is willing to testify. Consistent with our sincere desire to hear Dr. Ford’s testimony in her preferred setting—while, at the same time, respecting fundamental notions of due process and Committee practice—we are willing to meet you halfway. You demanded that we not hold the hearing on Monday because Dr. Ford needs time to prepare her testimony. Because Dr. Ford’s testimony will concern only her personal knowledge of events, events which she already described to the Washington Post, holding a hearing more than one week after she aired these allegations is more than reasonable. We will nevertheless reschedule the hearing for later in the week, as you requested. The Committee will take Dr. Ford’s and Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony on Wednesday, September 26. ...


Judiciary Committee Continues Effort to Accommodate Testimony from Dr. Ford Next Week | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

 

[ABikerSailor]

Ford has already said she is going to testify. The details are currently being hammered out by her lawyers, but she IS going to testify.

Just heard it on the news.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

But no one is asking for criminal charges

IF he committed a CRIME he should be prosecuted. There is as much evidence against him as there is against Trump colluding with Russia to steal an election from Hillary -- ZERO!

 

[Slade3200]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have bent over backwards to accommodate her. They have even offered more than once to travel to her for her testimony since it now appears she doesn’t like to fly.

They have given her five extensions, delayed the whole nomination process, agreed to her demands over the number of cameras and to keep Kav out of the room so he is denied the right to even face his accuser. They’ve even demanded that he, the accused, testify first, ie before the accuser, which is utterly ludicrous!

There certainly are people playing games, but it isn’t republicans. You really are full of crap.

...Grassley wrote on Twitter that he had "just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed [with] the statement she made last week to testify to the senate."

The GOP chairman didn't specify how long of an extension he is giving Ford, but his announcement kicks the negotiations over a public hearing into at least Saturday.

Grassley wrote on Twitter that Ford "[should] decide so we can move on," adding, "I want to hear her."

He noted the Judiciary Committee had given Ford five extensions to decide if she wanted to meet with the Senate panel. ...

Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony. Come to us or we to u," Grassley added in a tweet....

Grassley extends deadline for Kavanaugh accuser to decide on testifying

Well that’s a rather overly dramatic way of stating it. They negotiated a hearing. Ford made some demands, some of a the demands were over the top. Be grown ups, work it out. Properly bet the story and then take a vote. It isn’t hard

 

[hadit]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

Accommodating her just leads to more demands. The bottom line is that she was given an opportunity to tell her story and she refused.

 

[hadit]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

what's the rush by repubs on this now, when they refused to even have a hearing on Obama's supreme court nominee and left the court with only 8 justices for A YEAR?

If delaying was wrong then, it's wrong now.

 

[hadit]

Umm...it happened 36 years ago

It doesn't matter, it is a known fact that those abused, like the boys and girls by the Catholic Priests, hold in their trauma, for decades.... this is why the statute of limitations for felony sexual abuse of 5 to 10 years, are being removed by the States or are in the process of doing such.

But no one is asking for criminal charges, just the truth and what facts can be gathered to make an INFORMED decision on whether he should be seated as a SC Justice, for a lifetime, when they vote...

Which one of the democrats who stated that they would oppose ANYONE Trump nominated needs more information to make an informed decision?

 

[hadit]

One stall tactic after the other. They need more time to dig up another "victim" so they can say "Well well well, looks like Ford isn't the only victim". Watch and see.

Another last minute accuser? Nah, democrats wouldn't do that, would they?

 

[hadit]

Interesting that an admitted Orange ***** Grabber and now this new accused Kava ***** Grabber
needed a 9-hour White House meeting is it. To discuss/explain why this was not an assault by Kava ***** Grabber.

First she has to prove it ever happened.

 

[Tilly]

The Reps are now playing the political games too

How so?

They can’t take a couple of days to accommodate a lady whom is under death threats? They can’t ask the FBI to conduct a couple interviews/background checks? They won’t supenia other witnesses? Come on there are all kinds of games being played

They have bent over backwards to accommodate her. They have even offered more than once to travel to her for her testimony since it now appears she doesn’t like to fly.

They have given her five extensions, delayed the whole nomination process, agreed to her demands over the number of cameras and to keep Kav out of the room so he is denied the right to even face his accuser. They’ve even demanded that he, the accused, testify first, ie before the accuser, which is utterly ludicrous!

There certainly are people playing games, but it isn’t republicans. You really are full of crap.

...Grassley wrote on Twitter that he had "just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed [with] the statement she made last week to testify to the senate."

The GOP chairman didn't specify how long of an extension he is giving Ford, but his announcement kicks the negotiations over a public hearing into at least Saturday.

Grassley wrote on Twitter that Ford "[should] decide so we can move on," adding, "I want to hear her."

He noted the Judiciary Committee had given Ford five extensions to decide if she wanted to meet with the Senate panel. ...

Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony. Come to us or we to u," Grassley added in a tweet....

Grassley extends deadline for Kavanaugh accuser to decide on testifying

Well that’s a rather overly dramatic way of stating it. They negotiated a hearing. Ford made some demands, some of a the demands were over the top. Be grown ups, work it out. Properly bet the story and then take a vote. It isn’t hard

No, it’s not an overly dramatic way of stating it at all.
It’s absurd to demand that Kav testifies first, for one example, absolutely absurd.

The accused needs and has the right to hear the accusation in full before he responds. (He also has the right to face his accuser but they’ve agreed that he won’t be present in the same room).

If you don’t find asking the accused to testify before he hears the allegations from his accuser somewhat weird, you’ll need to explain why.

Why do you think that him testifying first is one of their demands?