Is Kent credible?

Do you believe Kent re our government’s alleged knowledge that Iran was not close to being able to


  • Total voters
    10
  • This poll will close: .
Caution?
:abgg2q.jpg:

Is that what you would suggest we believe?
No. Of course not. Because not lifting a finger to prevent the Islamofascist regime from acquiring the ability to make nuclear weapons is certainly a risk well worth taking.

Your level of abysmal idiocy can’t be measured.
 
If Iran had nukes or anything close, they would have used them by now.

Iran has been 2 weeks away from a nuke for like 40+ years now.

America first.

Greater Israel 2nd.

Trump stepping over needy Americans to dump money on Israel. SHAME

TRUMP is a huge disappointment.

Raise your hand if you voted for record high gas prices and endless foreign wars...
 
1- That’s merely your baseless presupposition.

First off, you need to sue your teachers for malpractice.

Secondly, you’re wrong, anyway.

The contention that we were “lied to” about Iraqi possession of WMD’s has zero bearing on whether we were lied to about the imminence of the Iranian regime’s ability to craft nuclear weapons.

It’s not “context.” On many matters it can be true that people and governments have lied. That doesn’t tell us whether or not anybody is lying in this instance.

But you don’t grasp that fact.

I don’t address the balance of your post since it’s non-responsive about the actual topic.
1- To suggest that a government that has lied to it's people, may be and most probably is lying again is not a "baseless presupposition."

2- "Sue teachers for malpractice?" Are you some kind of a failed law student with a grudge against your teachers? I would suggest you stop filing frivolous lawsuits and just seek a refund.

3- I did not suggest that as a basis for my argument. But you can continue with that illusion.

4- You link, your video. Your comment on that forces me to maybe consider that you have a much stronger case for malpractice versus a fund than I previously had thought. This could be a precedent setting case.
 
Do lots of people “rod” busses in your world?
Do you always come here to post personal attacks on just about everybody in sight? You remind me of a gut who wakes up like Trump, full of resentments, yet without the inherited fortune of The Lucky Sperm Club.
 
"We believe" as in the guests, bots, and members here. Are you one of those into that Royal "we?"
I have no idea what you are even talking about, sweetheart.
Where did you get the "we" thing from???
I gave MY personal opinion, and you go off like a ***** and make up your
own argument. Run along, *****. :eusa_whistle:
 
We aren't supplied with all the intel that the government has.
I can only make a guess, and with the rhetoric from the muslims
in that region, I'll err on the side of caution.
Caution?
:abgg2q.jpg:

Is that what you would suggest we believe?
I could care less what you believe, AH.
:eusa_whistle:
"We believe" as in the guests, bots, and members here. Are you one of those into that Royal "we?"
I have no idea what you are even talking about, sweetheart.
Where did you get the "we" thing from???
I gave MY personal opinion, and you go off like a ***** and make up your
own argument. Run along, *****. :eusa_whistle:

Maybe, just maybe that BackAgain character will allow you to join in his education lawsuit?
 

I offer the above ^ link to ask a related question.

Do you believe Kent?

If so, why? If not, why not?

(Incidentally, I realize that many people believe that our government “lied” to us about Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. But my question isn’t addressed to anything about such past issues. Instead, it focuses on this Iranian issue.)

They aren't remotely trustworthy. The fact is they were refining uranium, had more than enough for dirty bombs already, and weren't stopping like they agreed to, so **** them, they have to go, period. They've killed too many Americans already, and constantly attack our allies, have never honored and treaties or agreements, and never will. Time they were killed off.
 
They aren't remotely trustworthy. The fact is they were refining uranium, had more than enough for dirty bombs already, and weren't stopping like they agreed to, so **** them, they have to go, period. They've killed too many Americans already, and constantly attack our allies, have never honored and treaties or agreements, and never will. Time they were killed off.
Before or after Trump, all by his lonesome self killed off the JCPOA deal?
 
You're pretty stupid. Are you on drugs? Only idiots keep claiming the Iranians would honor any deal.
Nobody claimed that here. Please, do contact that BackAgain character about that education lawsuit. The whole point of why the JCPOA deal taking so long to come to fruition, was that the demands on Iran were all based on a perception of her trustworthiness (similar to how the world now thinks of the US-of-A now, thank you President Trump).

The JCPOA had unprecedented inspection agreements. It's obvious that some others here, your knowledge of what you insist on comment upon is based on memes and headlines.
 
15th post
:meow:

:pinkygirly:
People like you two are usually spotted as being so alike, it's frighteningly Gayish.
:scared1:


You homos always fall back on that stupid reverse psychology gimmick; it's a dead giveaway you're a deviant. You're retarded enough to believe it's going to scare somebody and shut them up or something. Doesn't work on most people. You'll just have to snivel to a mod like the other losers.
 
1- To suggest that a government that has lied to it's people, may be and most probably is lying again is not a "baseless presupposition."
It is of course possible. However, there is not a thing to support your idiotic claim that it’s “probable.” That IS a baseless presupposition.
2- "Sue teachers for malpractice?" Are you some kind of a failed law student with a grudge against your teachers? I would suggest you stop filing frivolous lawsuits and just seek a refund.
Because you took that as a literal suggestion? 🤣

God damn, you’re a dimwit.
3- I did not suggest that as a basis for my argument. But you can continue with that illusion.
Yes. You did. You are hereby granted permission to continue to deny reality.
4- You link, your video. Your comment on that forces me to maybe consider that you have a much stronger case for malpractice versus a fund than I previously had thought. This could be a precedent setting case.
You truly suck at communicating.

It’s ok with me that you disagree with me. But the balance of that fourth numbered paragraph is gibberish.
 
Nobody claimed that here. Please, do contact that BackAgain character about that education lawsuit. The whole point of why the JCPOA deal taking so long to come to fruition, was that the demands on Iran were all based on a perception of her trustworthiness (similar to how the world now thinks of the US-of-A now, thank you President Trump).

The JCPOA had unprecedented inspection agreements. It's obvious that some others here, your knowledge of what you insist on comment upon is based on memes and headlines.

More loads of rubbish. Keep plowing away; soon everybody will move on and fall asleep reading that drivel and you'll 'win da innernetz' or something.
 
Do you suggest that WE are privy to all the intel
that the government has? Are you really that stupid?
I ask, because you really seem to be that stupid. :eusa_whistle:
"Are you really that stupid" that you believe a government can keep secrets like this for any amount of time? We have top administration officials conducting witch hunts of tehir own staff because of the paranoia surrounding leaks.
 
Back
Top Bottom