Is Kent credible?

Do you believe Kent re our government’s alleged knowledge that Iran was not close to being able to


  • Total voters
    10
  • This poll will close: .
You homos always fall back on that stupid reverse psychology gimmick; it's a dead giveaway you're a deviant. You're retarded enough to believe it's going to scare somebody and shut them up or something. Doesn't work on most people. You'll just have to snivel to a mod like the other losers.
It cannot be lost on anybody who is reading this string of posts to each other, that it is you and that BackAgain character who fell straight into the gay crap attacks thing.
 
"Are you really that stupid" that you believe a government can keep secrets like this for any amount of time? We have top administration officials conducting witch hunts of tehir own staff because of the paranoia surrounding leaks.
It’s only a secret being kept if it’s true.

Obviously, your would-be argument requires your presupposition that Kent’s claim “is” true.

But your presupposition is, itself, not supported.
 
It cannot be lost on anybody who is reading this string of posts to each other, that it is you and that BackAgain character who fell straight into the gay crap attacks thing.
It would be lost on anybody with a brain, since it’s untrue.

You really can’t argue any point intelligently or effectively.
 

I offer the above ^ link to ask a related question.

Do you believe Kent?

If so, why? If not, why not?

(Incidentally, I realize that many people believe that our government “lied” to us about Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. But my question isn’t addressed to anything about such past issues. Instead, it focuses on this Iranian issue.)
It’s the same play, only sloppily executed, not solos, based on no real intelligence.

Kent was certainly not aware that Netanyahu had convinced the Clown Prince to start an unprovoked war.

Of course, the White House and the right wing noise machine have tried to obscure the fact.

The general concensus around the world was that Iran was not developing nuclear weapons.

Now, of course, it’s virtually certain that they are.
 

I offer the above ^ link to ask a related question.

Do you believe Kent?

If so, why? If not, why not?

(Incidentally, I realize that many people believe that our government “lied” to us about Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. But my question isn’t addressed to anything about such past issues. Instead, it focuses on this Iranian issue.)
The third choice should have been
I DO NOT have enough information to make an informed opinion.
All HAVE SEEN is political party based.
NO concrete info on the tools of war.
 
Trump cultists love the noise machine’s claim that Iran violated the JCPOA.

But they are careful not to notice that Trump tore it up before Iran renewed enrichment,
 
It’s the same play, only sloppily executed, not solos, based on no real intelligence.

Kent was certainly not aware that Netanyahu had convinced the Clown Prince to start an unprovoked war.

Of course, the White House and the right wing noise machine have tried to obscure the fact.

The general concensus around the world was that Iran was not developing nuclear weapons.

Now, of course, it’s virtually certain that they are.
So, you buy Kent’s claim because (although you have no logical support for it), you think America was lied into a different war.

That’s the thinking that makes you shitlibs so laughable.
 
It’s the same play, only sloppily executed, not solos, based on no real intelligence.

Kent was certainly not aware that Netanyahu had convinced the Clown Prince to start an unprovoked war.

Of course, the White House and the right wing noise machine have tried to obscure the fact.

The general concensus around the world was that Iran was not developing nuclear weapons.

Now, of course, it’s virtually certain that they are.
Neither claim is true.
Trump cultists love the noise machine’s claim that Iran violated the JCPOA.

But they are careful not to notice that Trump tore it up before Iran renewed enrichment,
You really need to stop showing off so much here. The personal attacks will get worse. The Cult members here, especially the ones who deny being in the cult will not have you messing with their minds with truths.
 
First off, you need to sue your teachers for malpractice.
Do lots of people “rod” busses in your world?
Your level of abysmal idiocy can’t be measured.
You certainly rely on such shortcuts to actual thought.
God damn, you’re a dimwit.

You truly suck at communicating.
It would be lost on anybody with a brain, since it’s untrue.

You really can’t argue any point intelligently or effectively.

That’s the thinking that makes you shitlibs so laughable.

par for the course with this guy
 
deflect often?
I have no idea what you are even talking about, sweetheart.
Where did you get the "we" thing from???
I gave MY personal opinion, and you go off like a ***** and make up your
own argument. Run along, *****. :eusa_whistle:

You homos always fall back on that stupid reverse psychology gimmick; it's a dead giveaway you're a deviant. You're retarded enough to believe it's going to scare somebody and shut them up or something. Doesn't work on most people. You'll just have to snivel to a mod like the other losers.
More loads of rubbish. Keep plowing away; soon everybody will move on and fall asleep reading that drivel and you'll 'win da innernetz' or something.
and that BackAgain character is not alone with this style of posting
 

I offer the above ^ link to ask a related question.

Do you believe Kent?

If so, why? If not, why not?

(Incidentally, I realize that many people believe that our government “lied” to us about Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. But my question isn’t addressed to anything about such past issues. Instead, it focuses on this Iranian issue.)
He's not just lying, he's compromised.
 
15th post

I offer the above ^ link to ask a related question.

Do you believe Kent?

If so, why? If not, why not?

(Incidentally, I realize that many people believe that our government “lied” to us about Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. But my question isn’t addressed to anything about such past issues. Instead, it focuses on this Iranian issue.)
He isn't credible since the Iranians flat-out stated they had a right to enrich.

There is ONLY ONE purpose to enrich beyond 2%, and they have material at 60%. A mere 10 days away from weapons-grade.
 

I offer the above ^ link to ask a related question.

Do you believe Kent?

If so, why? If not, why not?

(Incidentally, I realize that many people believe that our government “lied” to us about Iraq’s possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction. But my question isn’t addressed to anything about such past issues. Instead, it focuses on this Iranian issue.)
They built a f***ing reactor 100 feet below ground. Of course they are building nukes, or trying to, and eventually they will succeed, if no one stops them.
 
Back
Top Bottom