- Mar 13, 2012
- 41,015
- 15,966
- 2,260
Right off the bat you contradict yourself, you said "I totally support peoples' right to own a gun for hunting or target shooting" Now why can't I use an "assault rifle" for target shooting? Now what is your definition of an "assault rifle" , and don't just say a scary looking rifle. You say " No one needs an assault rifle at home" that is the same logic as saying "No one needs a Porsche for driving". It gets down to simply in America we have a choice of what we can own and that should not be infringed upon because it scares you.I truly believe, that guns only do harm There is no use for guns in our society. The 2nd amendment was made in a time where guns were necessary because of the British.
I totally agree with you, and congratulations on having the cojones to raise this issue.
Countries with less guns are almost always safer than the US, and that is simply a cold, hard truth that few gun rights fanatics are willing to admit.
I totally support peoples' right to own a gun for hunting or target shooting, but all of countries should have safety-based gun laws aimed at protecting life first and foremost. No one needs an assault rifle at home.