According to the IRS, the answer is mostly not.
Of the richest of the rich only 6.5% of income was from working, as of 2007. The rest came from things like interest, dividends, and capital gains.
In other words, the kind of income you get without having to wake up in the morning.
Which raises the question: if the rich are consuming without working, who is doing their work for them?
Link
I guess that would depend on your definition of "earn". If you define it as "suffering through a shitty job for someone else every day like I do", then no. The point of becoming rich is so you don't have to do that any more.
The definition of "unearned income" is income you get without work.
For some people the point of being on the dole is so they don't have to work.
Either way, they're consuming without producing.
At least you're willing to concede the rich don't work. That's something.
On the other hand, if you define it as "paying your dues to become wealthy enough to spend your time running your own business and/or managing your investments", then yeah. The vast majority of the rich DO earn their money. It's a known fact that most millionaires in this country are self-made.
Oops. I guess not.
Are the rich rich so they don't have to work? Or because they're running businesses and managing investments?
Or is running businesses and managing money not work?
And if it's not work, why do people get paid to do those things?
Isn't it so other people don't have to?