NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 26,300
- 5,543
- 245
It is obvious that facts that upset the false reality that you have created are always called irrrelevant. It is a fact that 1441 does not deal with any of the “whereas factors“ in the AUMF Iraq 2002. those that were unrelated to WMD disarmament we’re never meant or intended to be justification for the war. It is impossible that they were because of the “final opportunity” offering to the regime in Iraq.Don't know, don't care. Seems irrelevant
Some of the “whereas factors“ had absolutely nothing to do with enforcing United Nations Security Council resolutions with regard to Iraq.
An example is the “whereas factor” Regarding the 1998 establishing democracy Iraqi liberation act was passed in the United States Congress no United Nations Security Council.
W within the AUMF was restricted to “enforcing all relevant Security Council resolutions against Iraq“.
You’ve been living and telling a big Iraq lie for 18 years - The one that Iraq could be invaded based on the argument installing a democracy would make the world a better place without Saddam Hussein. The argument that without SH in the world it is a better place is true. But the launch of war solely on that basis has no merit and it was never authorized by the United States Congress. So you are a liar
Because SH was offered a final opportunity to comply and that dealt solely and inarguably with compliance on his disarmament issues there would not have been a war to nation build had SH complied or have been verified complied like the United Nations inspectors would have done but for the decision to kill half a million Iraqi in order to disarm Saddam Hussein through violence.
Last edited: