If Trump loses, expect a Republican civil war

[kyzr]

That's not True. Welfare is wealth redistribution. Republicans have had periods where they Controlled the Executive branch and both Congressional chambers, yet they still supported welfare. That makes them commies according to you, right?

There's no evidence they don't stop. They did stop the one time they had the chance not to. And at no time during that decade did they go after other guns.

And Turley, a respectable attorney, was wrong. Trump has lost every appeal in that case that Turley said could prevail. Where Trump did prevail was getting sentencing delayed. First by the SCOTUS who dragged their feet on the immunity issue. That delayed sentencing until later this month. But Trump lost in the appellate court which ruled the SCOTUS ruling on immunity doesn't apply in the NY case, so sentencing could go on. But now Judge Merchan has pushed the sentencing date back until after the election. And not because of a potential error in the case but on the enormity of the election.

1. Welfare is not wealth redistribution, its a social safety net, that I'd end back to the states. The Federal Budget can't support it, states can put people to work. (Your communism argument is nonsense.)

2. Turley can only predict what appeals SHOULD prevail according to the LAW. That they don't in NY just proves Lawfare. This is assuming that some higher court will actually overturn the verdict. We'll see who is right about Lawfare.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'd end back to the states.

Right wing code for, "hoping they will make it go away".

 

[Faun]

1. If the FBI really investigated the Biden Crime Family I'm sure Joe would have been indicted for something. Is selling influence a crime?

2. You don't destroy subpoenaed devices or emails, correct? What if the FBI rushed in to collect her evidence?

3. Comey's announcement wasn't as bad as him saying "no prosecutor would file charges", and then the DOJ said "oh well, nothing to see here". He should have indicted her for obstruction, not investigated her.

1. Republicans dug for dirt on Joe and found nothing. Which is all you got on him. Nothing. That's why the narrative changed to the Biden crime family. sucks for you, i know.

2. The evidence wasn't destroyed. It was copied onto new devices replacing the old devices.

3. The polls reflected the hit she took during the final weeks leading up to the election. There's really nothing you can say that's going to change that. Did it cost her the election? We'll never know. But there's no question it hurt her campaign. And it was intentionally made public by Comey who violated department rules by interfering with an election.

 

[Faun]

1. Welfare is not wealth redistribution, its a social safety net, that I'd end back to the states. The Federal Budget can't support it, states can put people to work. (Your communism argument is nonsense.)

2. Turley can only predict what appeals SHOULD prevail according to the LAW. That they don't in NY just proves Lawfare. This is assuming that some higher court will actually overturn the verdict. We'll see who is right about Lawfare.

FFS.

Sell stupid elseware. Welfare is the government taking wealth from some and redistributing it to those who need it, or can at least show they need it. The very definition of wealth redistribution.

Wealth redistribution - Vocab, Definition, and Must Know Facts | Fiveable

Wealth redistribution refers to the transfer of wealth, usually through government policies or programs, from one group or individual to another. The aim is to reduce economic inequality by reallocating resources and opportunities.

library.fiveable.me

 

[kyzr]

1. Republicans dug for dirt on Joe and found nothing. Which is all you got on him. Nothing. That's why the narrative changed to the Biden crime family. sucks for you, i know.

2. The evidence wasn't destroyed. It was copied onto new devices replacing the old devices.

3. The polls reflected the hit she took during the final weeks leading up to the election. There's really nothing you can say that's going to change that. Did it cost her the election? We'll never know. But there's no question it hurt her campaign. And it was intentionally made public by Comey who violated department rules by interfering with an election.

1. Comer found stuff. I like when Biden withheld $1b in Ukrainian aid until they fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter's cash-cow Burisma, and bragged about it. There were many "suspicious" bank transfers that the DOJ ignored.

Comer: Oversight Committee Has Uncovered Mounting Evidence Tying Joe Biden to Family Business Schemes

comer.house.gov

2. Subpoenaed devices and information were destroyed, period. Evidence was destroyed.

3. Comey mentioned "an investigation" when he should have recommended an indictment. We all knew about her "bathroom server" to defeat FOIA, and their bogus Clinton Foundation.

 

[kyzr]

Sell stupid elsewhere. Welfare is the government taking wealth from some and redistributing it to those who need it, or can at least show they need it. The very definition of wealth redistribution.

1. Welfare does NOT take wealth from anyone. Sell stupid elsewhere.

2. We pay taxes to the government who gives a small portion of that revenue as subsistence money to those unable to work, a "social safety net" to the very poor.

3. Redistribution of wealth is as your link says:
"Wealth redistribution refers to the transfer of wealth, usually through government policies or programs, from one group or individual to another. The aim is to reduce economic inequality by reallocating resources and opportunities."

"Welfare" as a program for the poor is nothing like "Wealth Redistribution" for the Communists.

 

[Faun]

1. Comer found stuff. I like when Biden withheld $1b in Ukrainian aid until they fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter's cash-cow Burisma, and bragged about it. There were many "suspicious" bank transfers that the DOJ ignored.

Comer: Oversight Committee Has Uncovered Mounting Evidence Tying Joe Biden to Family Business Schemes

comer.house.gov

2. Subpoenaed devices and information were destroyed, period. Evidence was destroyed.

3. Comey mentioned "an investigation" when he should have recommended an indictment. We all knew about her "bathroom server" to defeat FOIA, and their bogus Clinton Foundation.

Comer found nothing. He would have impeached Biden had he found anything. The one billion in aid was not a crime. It was supported by Obama, who had every authority to hold it up to oust a corrupt prosecutor.

Evidence was not destroyed. If you don't understand the meaning of transferring data from one device to another, I can't help you. Have you yourself never traded in one cell phone for a new one? They transfer your data from your old phone to your new phone before you leave the store.

Comey's public announcement about 2 weeks before the election, against department policy, hurt her campaign. Period.

 

[kyzr]

Comer found nothing. He would have impeached Biden had he found anything. The one billion in aid was not a crime. It was supported by Obama, who had every authority to hold it up to oust a corrupt prosecutor.

Evidence was not destroyed. If you don't understand the meaning of transferring data from one device to another, I can't help you. Have you yourself never traded in one cell phone for a new one? They transfer your data from your old phone to your new phone before you leave the store.

Comey's public announcement about 2 weeks before the election, against department policy, hurt her campaign. Period.

You believe your set of "facts" and I'll believe my "alternate facts".

 

[jbander]

Remember this doesn't end when Trump loses and MAGA is buried next to him, They have to be watched for the rest of their lives because I guaranty that if they get the chance they will try to overthrow this great country again and give it to some piece of shit like Trump. That's how they see us , they are either just stupid or it means dollars and cents to them.

 

[rampart]

There will be MASS Democrat suicides

book,arked for further reference.

 

[Zebra]

maybe

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Sporadic, ineffectual flares, perhaps.

Easily contained. Authorities needs to go after everyone who even suggests it online.

 

[Captain Caveman]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[jbander]

View attachment 1029078

Amen!

 

[M14 Shooter]

1. Welfare does NOT take wealth from anyone. Sell stupid elsewhere.

2. We pay taxes to the government who gives a small portion of that revenue as subsistence money to those unable to work, a "social safety net" to the very poor.

Your statements contradict themselves.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

MAGA knows better.

 

[toobfreak]

If Trump loses, expect a Republican civil war​

Conservatives can read the tea leaves and are starting to consider what the Republican Party will look like after a Trump loss.

 

[Independent thinker]

Conservatives can read the tea leaves and are starting to consider what the Republican Party will look like after a Trump loss. Conservative writer and Bush campaign creative team director is predicting a Republican Civil War if Trump loses.

Questions:
1. Does Trump go quietly if he loses?
2. Who can pull the Republican Party back together after it has been defined as a party of personality?

If Trump loses, expect a Republican civil war

To have one family in complete control of a major national political party is an aberration in our country. Daughter-in-law Lara Trump, installed as co-chair of the Republican National Committee in March, naively spoke the truth in February when she said of its fundraising, “Every single penny will go to the number one and the only job of the RNC — that is electing Donald J. Trump as president of the United States…”

That aside, a Trump loss inevitably means an internal civil war within the Republican Party. I believe a “war” is inevitable between the all-powerful Trump forces and those who want to move on from the Trump era and win the White House in 2028 without any Trump family members on the ticket.

Like all civil wars, this one could be brutal, because the GOP opposition forces see in Trumpism a political dead-end with a shrinking voter base. Today, identifying as a Republican is not about conservative governing principles but automatic loyalty to Trump, with his MAGA troops in control of the party machinery from top to bottom.

So who would it be? Some names are familiar and obvious: Former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who each look in the mirror and see a future president. Add a new name with popular Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R), who has had a contentious history with Trump — haven’t they all, though? That experience will embolden these leaders to forge a new path for the party, maybe led by one of them, or else a new leader will emerge.

Not to worry, all is good. But we are seeing a democrat civil war.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Dems will squabble, yes.

As will the GOP. Thune is Minority Leader, and the Gabbard and Gaetz nominations are dead in the water.