Money is confiscated and used to fund police departments and the agencies that end up with the money. The police officers also get rewarded when they confiscate money from citizens. But you're an idiot, so you think law enforcement should be confiscating people's hard-earned money, without a shred of evidence that they've acquired the cash, through illegal means. You're disgusting.
You idiot, do you actually think the "stories I brought up" from YouTube and my cousin, are the only people this is happening to? This has become a serious problem, with our fellow citizens losing their hard-earned cash, on mere suspicion that it's been acquired illegally. The US government has the legal right to take your hard-earned money, on mere suspicion that you've acquired it illegally, without proving it in court. That doesn't bother you, the defender of "liberal democracy"? How can that not irk you, Anton, the champion of true, open, pure, American, bright, shining, hot apple pie with ice cream, DEMOCRACY? How can that not bother you?
Again, more of your disingenuous lunacy. If my cousin wouldn't have pursued the case, they would've kept her money. Not too many people have the means to pursue litigation, challenging the government on such issues. Most of these injustices go unresolved and victims suffer, without compensation.
Not everyone gets their money back, due to lack of resources. So again, more disingenuous bullshit, on Anton's part, justifying this type of behavior from the government.
You're not thinking coherently, justifying the "liberal democracy" that confiscates people's money on mere suspicion that they've acquired it illegally, without proving it in court. My cousin lost $7,000, litigating this case, vs the government. Her friend, who she met in college, and is a lawyer, took her case and still charged her 7K. Imagine if it wasn't her friend, she would've easily spent twice or triple that amount, in order to get back $12K. Hello? That's your idea of "liberal democracy", this is just? You're sick. If this was happening in Russia, you would be quick to condemn it. You're a hypocrite piece of garbage. Trash.They carry around 10k+ in cash but don't have resources?
Again you are not posting coherently.
It means that when the government takes your money, on mere suspicion that you've done something wrong, without first proving it in court, it makes you litigate to get it back. Just because you say "That's my money", or show them receipts or that you've paid your taxes isn't enough. They shouldn't have the right to take your money on mere suspicion that you've done something wrong. They should first have to prove it in a court of law, that you've acquired those funds illegally, then and only then, do they have the right to take that money from you. But since you're ethically, and cerebrally deficient, you're unable to appreciate what I just said. It's like teaching simple arithmetic to a hamster. It doesn't make any sense to you.
Exactly, statistics, among others, about cocaine, heroin, and drug abuse. Read about them, and don't hide behind prescription drugs and alcohol.
They carry around 10k+ in cash but don't have resources?
Again you are not posting coherently.
It gets to a point where I realize, the person isn't worth interacting with. They're dishonest, irrational, and the best thing to do is just ignore them.
If they make you a criminal for having some amount of cash with you and you should prove your innocence a court, then it is something wrong with the system.
Well, at least you recognize we have a problem in this country with the government taking our shit, unethically, without a warrant. What you said about my commie friends is entertaining, thanks for the good laugh.
Innocent till proven guilty. But in reality, it's something else. You're guilty till you prove your innocence, and that the money was earned legally. You have to spend thousands, hundreds of thousands of dollars or more, proving your innocence.
