If Trump loses, expect a Republican civil war

[Faun]

You moron.
You may not recognize it as communism, but the democrat policies are all pushing toward one party rule, i.e. Communism.

Open the borders, let in millions of democrat votes
Mass amnesty, let millions of illegals vote
End the filibuster, make new Laws with small majority
Pack the supreme court, ensure Leftists control
Gun control, keep the population defenseless
Lawfare against Republicans, just like in commie Banana Republics
Teach CRT in all schools, keep the population riled up
Continued attacks on parental rights (take kids from parents to transition) ensure government control of everything
Add DC & Puerto Rico as states guaranteeing democrats permanent majorities
Hire 80,000 new IRS agents willing to kill. A new Waffen SS.
Tax unrealized gains of investment. Redistribute wealth, aka "Communism"
Tax unrealized gains on house value. Redistribute wealth, aka "Communism"
Supports Medicare for all and elimination of private healthcare insurance. Government control of healthcare

If communism is defined as one-party rule, then that would make Republicans Communists too since they also want one-party rule.

Reagan is the only president to give amnesty to illegal aliens. Guess that too makes Republicans Communists.

The left did not pack the Supreme Court, even when they had the chance. Republicans did block Obama's pick though, which gave Republicans an advantage on the bench. Guess that too makes them Communists.

Democrats do not seek to confiscate all weapons, just some of the ones which kill at a much higher rate.

There is no lawfare. Trump was already proven guilty in one indictment and there's evidence he's guilty in the other 3. And regardless, Communism isn't defined by lawfare.

Commumism is also not defined as teaching CRT in schools. Banning books in schools might be considered Nazism though.

Seems to me you don’t even know what Communism really is. You just know it's a pejorative with which you want to tar & feather your political opponents.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

There won’t be a Republican civil war should Trump lose.

There also won’t be any analysis of what went wrong, no introspection, no postmortem.

Instead, we’ll see the same childish whining and stupid lies.

Lies about the election being ‘rigged,’ lies about Democrats ‘cheating,’ and lies about the election being ‘stolen’ from Trump when Democrats lawfully, constitutionally nominated Vice President Harris.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Ds are pushing communism

No one believes this ridiculous lie; clearly you have no idea what ‘communism’ is.

 

[Harry Dresden]

What did she do. You haven't told us ANYTHING AT ALL except you were there and you know what she did.

Alright, Harry, Tell us what she did. Give us examples. GIVE US FACTS FOR A CHANGE. Stop telling us how you feel about her, because your feelings are irrelevant. FACTS Harry, not feelings.

why are my feelings about her irrelevant?...why cant you accept the fact that i dont care for her?...did you like every politician you ever encountered?..she wasnt as great as you people think she is ...she was embroiled in quite a few controversies while AG out here which are easy to look up.....she is a hypocrite about pot....she also right now proved she cant be trusted because she withheld what she knew about bidens mental problems,which she shouldnt have done,the guy isnt head of of a corporation he is the president, there is a difference and the people deserved to know....6 months ago there were people wondering if biden should consider replacing her....now all of a sudden she is gods gift to politics...my opinion of her is on just what i have experienced with her....she is in over her head and when all the problems in this country fall onto her lap if she wins,you might just see what i mean.....i hope she proves me wrong....but i aint going to hold my breath...

 

[Cellblock2429]

Why? Why should non-Republicans vote to save the Republican party?

/----/ Yours and the OPs concern for the survival of the GOP is touching.

 

[Faun]

/----/ Yours and the OPs concern for the survival of the GOP is touching.

Why should I care about a political party who supports their leader who tried to steal the election he lost with fake electors? And deludes himself into believing he had a right to steal it.

 

[kyzr]

Why should I care about a political party who supports their leader who tried to steal the election he lost with fake electors? And deludes himself into believing he had a right to steal it.

You'd rather care about a political party installed by Oligarchs, the Deep State, and the MSM.
1. Zuckerbucks was a major factor in winning WI

The Wisconsin "Zuckerbucks" Problem: New Data Reveals Private Funding of Election Offices Was More Widespread Than Initially Estimated

Given the proliferation of Zuckerbucks in 2020, Wisconsin should be the next state to safeguard their elections from outside influence.

thefga.org

The Wisconsin “Zuckerbucks” Problem: New Data Reveals Private Funding of Election Offices Was More Widespread Than Initially Estimated​

2. The FBI (Elvis Chen) colluded with

The FBI Colluded With Twitter to Suppress Free Speech. Where's the Outrage?

We've learned that federal law enforcement must follow the Constitution with the diligence and discipline of a marathon runner in training.

www.newsweek.com

The FBI Colluded With Twitter to Suppress Free Speech. Where Is the Outrage?​

3. The FBI did not follow up on the crimes detailed in Hunter's laptop, they covered them up to protect Biden.

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower

IRS supervisory agent Gary Shapley told Congress the laptop was “verified” in November 2019 and an expert assessed “it was not manipulated in any way.”

nypost.com

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower​

Not only that, but Blinken got 51 traitors to sign a memo that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, depriving voters of necessary information.


So you can say Trump tried to steal back an election that was actually stolen from him.

 

[kyzr]

No one believes this ridiculous lie; clearly you have no idea what ‘communism’ is.

One party rule with no check or balances is close enough for me to call it communism.

 

[kyzr]

There won’t be a Republican civil war should Trump lose.

There also won’t be any analysis of what went wrong, no introspection, no postmortem.

Instead, we’ll see the same childish whining and stupid lies.

Lies about the election being ‘rigged,’ lies about Democrats ‘cheating,’ and lies about the election being ‘stolen’ from Trump when Democrats lawfully, constitutionally nominated Vice President Harris.

1. We agree that there won't be a GOP civil war should Trump lose. It will be on to 2028 without Trump.

2. Should Trump lose in a very close election the analysis should be "could Nikki Haley or Ron Desantis" have done better? Was Trump's baggage too easy for the MSM to pound Trump with?

3. There won't be any lies should Trump lose.
In fact, should Trump lose, the voters deserve what happens to them during a Harris presidency.

 

[kyzr]

If communism is defined as one-party rule, then that would make Republicans Communists too since they also want one-party rule. Reagan is the only president to give amnesty to illegal aliens. Guess that too makes Republicans Communists. The left did not pack the Supreme Court, even when they had the chance. Republicans did block Obama's pick though, which gave Republicans an advantage on the bench. Guess that too makes them Communists.

Democrats do not seek to confiscate all weapons, just some of the ones which kill at a much higher rate.

There is no lawfare. Trump was already proven guilty in one indictment and there's evidence he's guilty in the other 3. And regardless, Communism isn't defined by lawfare. Communism is also not defined as teaching CRT in schools. Banning books in schools might be considered Nazism though.

Seems to me you don’t even know what Communism really is. You just know it's a pejorative with which you want to tar & feather your political opponents.

1. Yes I define "communism" as one-party rule with the intent to redistribute wealth, and abuse political power against political opponents, instead of letting capitalism run the economy.

2. Gun grabbers never stop.

3. Yes there is "Lawfare". That Trump was "proven" guilty in a Kangaroo Court proves it. Legal experts believe that the bullshit cases against Trump will be overturned on appeal. We'll need to wait and see how it plays out over time.

4. Banning books like "Gender Queer" to protect kids from being exposed to deviant behaviors is a good thing, especially if parents support the policy. If parents want their kids to read that garbage they can buy the book for their kids. The books are available except in school.

 

[Faun]

You'd rather care about a political party installed by Oligarchs, the Deep State, and the MSM.
1. Zuckerbucks was a major factor in winning WI

The Wisconsin "Zuckerbucks" Problem: New Data Reveals Private Funding of Election Offices Was More Widespread Than Initially Estimated

Given the proliferation of Zuckerbucks in 2020, Wisconsin should be the next state to safeguard their elections from outside influence.

thefga.org

The Wisconsin “Zuckerbucks” Problem: New Data Reveals Private Funding of Election Offices Was More Widespread Than Initially Estimated​

2. The FBI (Elvis Chen) colluded with

The FBI Colluded With Twitter to Suppress Free Speech. Where's the Outrage?

We've learned that federal law enforcement must follow the Constitution with the diligence and discipline of a marathon runner in training.

www.newsweek.com

The FBI Colluded With Twitter to Suppress Free Speech. Where Is the Outrage?​

3. The FBI did not follow up on the crimes detailed in Hunter's laptop, they covered them up to protect Biden.

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower

IRS supervisory agent Gary Shapley told Congress the laptop was “verified” in November 2019 and an expert assessed “it was not manipulated in any way.”

nypost.com

FBI ‘verified’ authenticity of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop in November 2019: IRS whistleblower​

Not only that, but Blinken got 51 traitors to sign a memo that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation, depriving voters of necessary information.


So you can say Trump tried to steal back an election that was actually stolen from him.

First of all, Zuckerberg was allowed to do what he did thanks to Republicans, who we can thank for giving us Citizens United.

Secondly, foreign entities were abusing our own social media sites in 2016 in order to sway the election. So in 2020, the FBI fed information of suspected foreign entities to social media in order to prevent a repeat of 2016. Further, social media chose to heed their warnings. That's not censorship, that's a private company making business decisions. That's not stealing an election, it's trying to preserve the integrity of the election.

They were entirely wrong with how they handled Hunter's laptop, I agree with you there. They had it for a year. They could have, should have, and probably did, determine its veracity and didn't act on it until after the election. But that said, there was nothing on there incriminating Joe Biden. Just some of his family members and mostly Hunter.

If that's stealing an election, then the election was stolen from Hillary by Russia, who hacked Demorats' emails and had them pumped on the internet; and by James Comey, who ignored his own DoJ policy and publicly announced he was reopening the investigation into Hillary's email server just over a week before the election.

See how that works? Live by the sword, die by the sword.

I don't personally believe either was stolen.

 

[Faun]

1. Yes I define "communism" as one-party rule with the intent to redistribute wealth, and abuse political power against political opponents, instead of letting capitalism run the economy.

2. Gun grabbers never stop.

3. Yes there is "Lawfare". That Trump was "proven" guilty in a Kangaroo Court proves it. Legal experts believe that the bullshit cases against Trump will be overturned on appeal. We'll need to wait and see how it plays out over time.

4. Banning books like "Gender Queer" to protect kids from being exposed to deviant behaviors is a good thing, especially if parents support the policy. If parents want their kids to read that garbage they can buy the book for their kids. The books are available except in school.

1. Redistribution of wealth is not dependent on one party. And wealth redistribution, as it pertains to communism, is in regards to a classless society where individuals do not own property, businesses, production or distribution. Government or societies do and they spread the wealth gained from it. Virtually no Democrats support that.

See that? I was right. You don't know what Communism is.

2. Not true. In the 90's, we banned those same types of weapons. They stopped at grabbing other guns.

3. You can call it a Kangaroo Court if that makes you feel better, but he was rightfully found guilty based on the evidence. I gave more details on that here, if you're interested.

4. Many of the banned books had nothing to do with LGBT........ (whatever the letters are).

 

[kyzr]

First of all, Zuckerberg was allowed to do what he did thanks to Republicans, who we can thank for giving us Citizens United.

Secondly, foreign entities were abusing our own social media sites in 2016 in order to sway the election. So in 2020, the FBI fed information of suspected foreign entities to social media in order to prevent a repeat of 2016. Further, social media chose to heed their warnings. That's not censorship, that's a private company making business decisions. That's not stealing an election, it's trying to preserve the integrity of the election.

They were entirely wrong with how they handled Hunter's laptop, I agree with you there. They had it for a year. They could have, should have, and probably did, determine its veracity and didn't act on it until after the election. But that said, there was nothing on there incriminating Joe Biden. Just some of his family members and mostly Hunter.

If that's stealing an election, then the election was stolen from Hillary by Russia, who hacked Democrats' emails and had them pumped on the internet; and by James Comey, who ignored his own DoJ policy and publicly announced he was reopening the investigation into Hillary's email server just over a week before the election. See how that works? Live by the sword, die by the sword. I don't personally believe either was stolen.

1. OK, Zuckerbucks was enabled by Citizens United, but he didn't just "donate" to a party, he got way more involved. If Elon helps Trump this year we'll call that even up.

2. The FBI enabled Biden to skate on his many obvious crimes. Banks reported many suspicious money transfers, that were ignored by the FBI. The Biden Crime Family skated on $30m of illicit gains. The IRS and DOJ let the worst tax evasion offenses expire. Joe Biden "the big guy" had bills paid by Hunter. Yes that is stealing an election.

3. Russia did not hack Hillary, they hacked Podesta, whose password was "password". Trump wanted Russia to release the 30,000 subpoenaed emails that Russia supposedly hacked from Hillary's bathroom server, but they didn't. How about Hillary destroying all her subpoenaed devices, is that a crime? Comey's announcement didn't affect any votes, we all knew Hillary was a criminal before that.

 

[kyzr]

1. Redistribution of wealth is not dependent on one party. And wealth redistribution, as it pertains to communism, is in regards to a classless society where individuals do not own property, businesses, production or distribution. Government or societies do and they spread the wealth gained from it. Virtually no Democrats support that. See that? I was right. You don't know what Communism is.

2. Not true. In the 90's, we banned those same types of weapons. They stopped at grabbing other guns.

3. You can call it a Kangaroo Court if that makes you feel better, but he was rightfully found guilty based on the evidence. I gave more details on that here, if you're interested.

4. Many of the banned books had nothing to do with LGBT........ (whatever the letters are).

1. If you don't like the name "Communism" see how "Socialism" fits. Point being the "1-party" government has all the power and uses it against political opponents. Redistribution of wealth does depend on one party, democrats. Over time as the wealthy dwindle, there would be a classless society, just government party bosses, mid-level functionaries, and everyone else working for buckets of rice.

2. Gun grabbers never stop, I remember when gun manufacturers were sued when a shooter used one of their guns illegally. I remember when Letitia James tried to end the NRA.

3. Trump was wrongly found guilty according to the LAW. Here is an expert opinion again.

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…

jonathanturley.org

The most compelling grounds for an appeal
The Judge, The Charges, The Evidence, The Instructions

 

[Faun]

1. OK, Zuckerbucks was enabled by Citizens United, but he didn't just "donate" to a party, he got way more involved. If Elon helps Trump this year we'll call that even up.

2. The FBI enabled Biden to skate on his many obvious crimes. Banks reported many suspicious money transfers, that were ignored by the FBI. The Biden Crime Family skated on $30m of illicit gains. The IRS and DOJ let the worst tax evasion offenses expire. Joe Biden "the big guy" had bills paid by Hunter. Yes that is stealing an election.

3. Russia did not hack Hillary, they hacked Podesta, whose password was "password". Trump wanted Russia to release the 30,000 subpoenaed emails that Russia supposedly hacked from Hillary's bathroom server, but they didn't. How about Hillary destroying all her subpoenaed devices, is that a crime? Comey's announcement didn't affect any votes, we all knew Hillary was a criminal before that.

There were no crimes committed by Joe stemming from Hunter's Laptop. Republicans hunted this for years And at the end of the day, found nothing on Joe. No crimes referred to the DoJ; no articles of impeachment drafted.

I said they hacked Democrats. They did. And by the way, they tried to hack Hillary just hours after Trump suggested they look for her missing emails. But they were apparently unsuccessful. Destroying devices is SOP when being replaced with newer devices. The aide first backed up phones from old ones to new ones, then destroyed the old ones to ensure no one could ever recover data from them. And yes, Comey's announcement hurt her candidacy as evidenced by her drop in the polls. It's insane to claim that didn’t change a single person's vote.

 

[jbander]

All I'm doing is just responding to only the title of the post, not bothering with the replies.

and all I'm doing is responding to your ridiculous comment.

There were no crimes committed by Joe stemming from Hunter's Laptop. Republicans hunted this for years And at the end of the day, found nothing on Joe. No crimes referred to the DoJ; no articles of impeachment drafted.

I said they hacked Democrats. They did. And by the way, they tried to hack Hillary just hours after Trump suggested they look for her missing emails. But they were apparently unsuccessful. Destroying devices is SOP when being replaced with newer devices. The aide first backed up phones from old ones to new ones, then destroyed the old ones to ensure no one could ever recover data from them. And yes, Comey's announcement hurt her candidacy as evidenced by her drop in the polls. It's insane to claim that didn’t change a single person's vote.

How stupid can a group get ,Trump is innocent with endless proof of his guilt but The president is guilty by something his son does , and having no proof to support this . That's the definition of a loser!

 

[Faun]

1. If you don't like the name "Communism" see how "Socialism" fits. Point being the "1-party" government has all the power and uses it against political opponents. Redistribution of wealth does depend on one party, democrats. Over time as the wealthy dwindle, there would be a classless society, just government party bosses, mid-level functionaries, and everyone else working for buckets of rice.

2. Gun grabbers never stop, I remember when gun manufacturers were sued when a shooter used one of their guns illegally. I remember when Letitia James tried to end the NRA.

3. Trump was wrongly found guilty according to the LAW. Here is an expert opinion again.

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…

jonathanturley.org

The most compelling grounds for an appeal
The Judge, The Charges, The Evidence, The Instructions

That's not True. Welfare is wealth redistribution. Republicans have had periods where they Controlled the Executive branch and both Congressional chambers, yet they still supported welfare. That makes them commies according to you, right?

There's no evidence they don't stop. They did stop the one time they had the chance not to. And at no time during that decade did they go after other guns.

And Turley, a respectable attorney, was wrong. Trump has lost every appeal in that case that Turley said could prevail. Where Trump did prevail was getting sentencing delayed. First by the SCOTUS who dragged their feet on the immunity issue. That delayed sentencing until later this month. But Trump lost in the appellate court which ruled the SCOTUS ruling on immunity doesn't apply in the NY case, so sentencing could go on. But now Judge Merchan has pushed the sentencing date back until after the election. And not because of a potential error in the case but on the enormity of the election.

 

[HikerGuy83]

 

[M14 Shooter]

View attachment 1007518

OH and FL are blue?

 

[kyzr]

There were no crimes committed by Joe stemming from Hunter's Laptop. Republicans hunted this for years And at the end of the day, found nothing on Joe. No crimes referred to the DoJ; no articles of impeachment drafted.

I said they hacked Democrats. They did. And by the way, they tried to hack Hillary just hours after Trump suggested they look for her missing emails. But they were apparently unsuccessful. Destroying devices is SOP when being replaced with newer devices. The aide first backed up phones from old ones to new ones, then destroyed the old ones to ensure no one could ever recover data from them. And yes, Comey's announcement hurt her candidacy as evidenced by her drop in the polls. It's insane to claim that didn’t change a single person's vote.

1. If the FBI really investigated the Biden Crime Family I'm sure Joe would have been indicted for something. Is selling influence a crime?

2. You don't destroy subpoenaed devices or emails, correct? What if the FBI rushed in to collect her evidence?

3. Comey's announcement wasn't as bad as him saying "no prosecutor would file charges", and then the DOJ said "oh well, nothing to see here". He should have indicted her for obstruction, not investigated her.