With every one of my post.Where do you debunk anything I have posted?Everything you have said
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With every one of my post.Where do you debunk anything I have posted?Everything you have said
But Xiden didn't say that at first....you lie.
Xiden didn't say that at first....you lie.
With every one of my post.
He had already authorized the President to use force at that point....and been talking up ground troops for five plus years....“You and I believe, and many of us believe here, as long as Saddam is at the helm, there is no reasonable prospect you or any other inspector is ever going to be able to guarantee that we have rooted out, root and branch, the entirety of Saddam’s program relative to weapons of mass destruction. You and I both know, and all of us here really know, and it’s a thing we have to face, that the only way, the only way we’re going to get rid of Saddam Hussein is we’re going to end up having to start it alone — start it alone — and it’s going to require guys like you in uniform to be back on foot in the desert taking this son of a — taking Saddam down,” Biden said. “You know it and I know it.” -Xiden 1998.But Xiden didn't say that at first....you lie.
I’m debunking you: Biden said it in February 2003:
Biden February 5, 2003: Now that the secretary of State has done his job, the president I think must finish his job. And that is he must engage in a personal diplomacy with -- as he already is doing, based on my breakfast with him this morning, with others -- with key members of the Security Council to pass a second resolution setting a certain definition deadline authorizing the use of force if necessary in order to disarm Saddam Hussein. Iraqi Weapons ViolationsAnd There is this - specifically the last paragraph makes you a liar.
Senator Joe Biden *3: Senator Biden ....”taking some issue with the administration on how they approach this subject.U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, FEBRUARY 2003 HEARING on IraqSenator Joe Biden *3: And I want to make it clear. I think the disagreements, (with the Administration) to the extent they exist, are based on the risk assessment as it relates to timing.Senator Joe Biden *3: I think the goal that we have is to separate Saddam Hussein from his weapons of mass destruction with the greatest possible support of the world that we can get, to reduce, in direct proportion, the risk we face in separating and, after separating, securing Iraq. That, to me, is the goal.Senator Joe Biden *3: I would like to return to three points that have been raised by ...Senator Voinovich, ..he said the question is not, Will Saddam--respond if he's given more time?Senator Joe Biden *3: This is a tactical difference we have. I think the question is, If we give more time, will that markedly increase the support we get from the rest of the world, and weigh that against the risks?Senator Joe Biden *3: So the question, for me, is, Will the additional time given increase the risk beyond the support we will get by allowing more timeSenator Joe Biden *3: I say, the value--not the legitimacy, not the justness, not the equities--this guy does not deserve another tenth of a second, but by giving him another 3 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months and not moving until the next``cold,'' quote/unquote, season in their--in the late fall, what is the risk of doing that relative to the amount of support we would pick up, making our overall job, which is going to be immense, in my view, easier?Senator Joe Biden *3: But the question is, Does his failure to cooperate increase the risk in a way that outweighs the risk of going with fewer people, less support when we go?Senator Joe Biden *3: Now, I realize that maintaining the deployment of a hundred-plus-thousand forces in the region is costly. I would just raise, for--as a question to be considered--it is a heck of a lot more costly to deploy those forces with fewer people helping us, and less commitment to mop up after it is over.Senator Joe Biden *3: I am going to front-end guess it. I come down on the side of suggesting that another several months is not something that in any way appreciably increases any risk.
He had already authorized the President to use force at that point.
Sorry the language of Xiden's authorization didn't say "if necessary" it authorized him to use military force as he DEEMED necessary.He had already authorized the President to use force at that point.
If necessary.
Biden’s vote didn’t mean he had to agree with a President that ends up lying to him and the entire world to make his rotten decision to invade appear to be a necessary decision with no other options
When bush lied bought a rack hiding WMD from the inspectors remove any responsibility Biden and the other Democrats might’ve had their boat in October 2002.
You believe the lies. And you believe the Liar. And you applaud the lie because you are a warmonger.
Post the language liar,Sorry the language of Xiden's authorization didn't say "if necessary" it authorized him to use military force as he DEEMED necessar
Wow...you really can't read...even what you post yourself:Post the language liar,Sorry the language of Xiden's authorization didn't say "if necessary" it authorized him to use military force as he DEEMED necessar
Deemed is not in the version I have:
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to --
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that --
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
whether W determined or deemed it to be necessary or that it was necessary he still lied about the necessity and Biden is not responsible for voting to authorize a president who would lie about such a grave matter as sending our young service men and women into war.
Do you see the two words “to be” that means it was not necessary on the date of the vote but it may be at some future point depending on certain conditionsWow...you really can't read...even what you post yourself:Post the language liar,Sorry the language of Xiden's authorization didn't say "if necessary" it authorized him to use military force as he DEEMED necessar
Deemed is not in the version I have:
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to --
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that --
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
whether W determined or deemed it to be necessary or that it was necessary he still lied about the necessity and Biden is not responsible for voting to authorize a president who would lie about such a grave matter as sending our young service men and women into war.
" AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to
Moron! “As he deemed necessary“ is past tense. You were saying senator Joe Biden authorized the use of military force for a decision that George W. Bush has already made.That will be added to your list of lies.Sorry the language of Xiden's authorization didn't say "if necessary" it authorized him to use military force as he DEEMED necessary.
I agree with that 1000 percent. What is wrong with Biden saying that ever. Bush lied about SH hiding them from inspectors in March to start a war. That is not Bush being concerned. That was Bush lying to make his concerns into making a case for war.“In my judgment, President Bush is right to be concerned about Saddam Hussein’s relentless pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and the possibility that he may use them or share them with terrorists,”
M
I agree with that 1000 percent. What is wrong with Biden saying that ever. Bush lied about SH hiding them from inspectors in March to start a war. That is not Bush being concerned. That was Bush lying to make his concerns into making a case for war.“In my judgment, President Bush is right to be concerned about Saddam Hussein’s relentless pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and the possibility that he may use them or share them with terrorists,”
bush just said what the inspectors saidM
I agree with that 1000 percent. What is wrong with Biden saying that ever. Bush lied about SH hiding them from inspectors in March to start a war. That is not Bush being concerned. That was Bush lying to make his concerns into making a case for war.“In my judgment, President Bush is right to be concerned about Saddam Hussein’s relentless pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and the possibility that he may use them or share them with terrorists,”
yeah it means whatever the president deemed to be necessary. geezDo you see the two words “to be” that means it was not necessary on the date of the vote but it may be at some future point depending on certain conditionsWow...you really can't read...even what you post yourself:Post the language liar,Sorry the language of Xiden's authorization didn't say "if necessary" it authorized him to use military force as he DEEMED necessar
Deemed is not in the version I have:
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to --
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION- In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that --
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
whether W determined or deemed it to be necessary or that it was necessary he still lied about the necessity and Biden is not responsible for voting to authorize a president who would lie about such a grave matter as sending our young service men and women into war.
" AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to
By whom?Could have been an honest mistake.
bush just said what the inspectors said
Not in the AUMF. You lied before and you got caught. You said Joe B authorized Bush to use military force as he DEEMED necessary.” You left out “to be” in your original version.yeah it means whatever the president deemed to be necessary. geez
By whom?Could have been an honest mistake.
bush just said what the inspectors said
Not in the AUMF. You lied before and you got caught. You said Joe B authorized Bush to use military force as he DEEMED necessary.” You left out “to be” in your original version.yeah it means whatever the president deemed to be necessary. geez
The actual AUMF uses the word “determines to be necessary” not “deems to be necessary” There is a difference and you therefore are a liar.yeah it means whatever the president deemed to be necessary. geez
Bush was a republican and responsible for the success in iraqLet me post this video again...this was 5 years before Bush:Joe Biden Was Talking Up War With Iraq Five Years Before Invasion
“You and I believe, and many of us believe here, as long as Saddam is at the helm, there is no reasonable prospect you or any other inspector is ever going to be able to guarantee that we have rooted out, root and branch, the entirety of Saddam’s program relative to weapons of mass destruction. You and I both know, and all of us here really know, and it’s a thing we have to face, that the only way, the only way we’re going to get rid of Saddam Hussein is we’re going to end up having to start it alone — start it alone — and it’s going to require guys like you in uniform to be back on foot in the desert taking this son of a — taking Saddam down,”
Hey, maybe Republicans can all retire from politics, because they are never responsible for anything, according to you.
Biden didn't send troops into Iraq, Bush did.
Six out of ten Americans in March 2003 wanted inspections to continue and military action withheld until the inspections were completed. Six out of ten Americans in March 2003 wanted Bush to get UN Endorsement if the inspections were not successful prior to taking military action. Joe Biden and I were with the 6 out of ten Americans.that’s why i don’t go around being critical of Bush and the people that supported it.