Penelope
Diamond Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 60,260
- 15,768
- 2,210
- Thread starter
- #41
then why take a stance against removing that law?wrong again fuckchop.LET THEM DIE!
The republican party is the party of satan.
If you are actually dying or in actual 'need' of medical care, you will get it, and you won't have to sit, in pain, for hours, to get it.
They do triage in ER's so if you have to sit in pain for awhile, just be assured that are more sick people ahead of you. After all that is what ER's are for.
Indeed they do. But when you add in a large number of non-emergency patients it does cause problems, regardless of the triage. The staff is more distracted and certainly more exhausted. The chances of errors goes up. The time a Dr has to actually talk to the patient goes down. Lab tests are delayed ect ect.
I agree, and I agree ER should be used for emergencies. Doctors offices should be used, and that takes ins and or money.
you just agreed it's a bad idea.
Because they are killing the ACA and Medicaid. In the OP I explained that. She is also wanting to defund PP where males go to as well. Back to the days of pre-existing conditions with rates so high the median income can't afford ins , long questionnaires for ins. unless you work for a large company, caps on ins.