Dems want to pack the USSC

[Faun]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

ANYBODY the left disagrees with 8s "illegitimate "

Oh? Do you think Biden is an illegitimate president? Or even the Democrat party? Legitimate or illegitimate?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Be VERY SPECIFIC and list who and how they are disqualified, be specific and list the regulation or law violated to nominate and chose them.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Be VERY SPECIFIC and list who and how they are disqualified, be specific and list the regulation or law violated to nominate and chose them.

 

[Crepitus]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

ANYBODY the left disagrees with 8s "illegitimate "

No.

 

[Crepitus]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Be VERY SPECIFIC and list who and how they are disqualified, be specific and list the regulation or law violated to nominate and chose them.

Already done, read the thread

 

[RetiredGySgt]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Be VERY SPECIFIC and list who and how they are disqualified, be specific and list the regulation or law violated to nominate and chose them.

Already done, read the thread

All I saw was a generic response of the senate used different opinions on when to vote and one of them lied. I watched the confirmation he never lied. And the senate decides the timing and when to vote so nothing there either,

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Democrats and Republicans on the committee agreed?

By what measure? i quoted the FBI investigation summary by the director that speaks to your claim you made up wholecloth.. And you are running from it at full sprint. you won't even mention it. Because it is the final word, and you no likey. Tough. The Hilary email scandal was gutted by the FBI, but you think it was a 'spiracy. Cool.

The part where there was massive deficiency.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

 

[miketx]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

I want to pack Cuba with dems.
Mike's head voice- How would you do that, Mike?
Have the police find them one at a time, pull out their little pop gun and arrest them, take them to where the C-17 is waiting and load them up. Then fly to Cuba and when you get there fly real low, open that big back door and kick them all out.
Mike's head voice - But Mike, that would kill them.
Then they would not have to be a burden to Cuba's wonderful health care.

 

[Faun]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

 

[Faun]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

 

[Faun]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

You made the claim, OCD ridden fat fuck and now you deflect. That is the OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun MO. LOL.

Run along now, loser.

 

[Faun]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

You made the claim, OCD ridden fat fuck and now you deflect. That is the OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun MO. LOL.

Run along now, loser.
View attachment 509424

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

You made the claim, OCD ridden fat fuck and now you deflect. That is the OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun MO. LOL.

Run along now, loser.
View attachment 509424

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

Nope. You said I posted more than what I said above so either show that or STFU you OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun.

 

[Faun]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

You made the claim, OCD ridden fat fuck and now you deflect. That is the OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun MO. LOL.

Run along now, loser.
View attachment 509424

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

Nope. You said I posted more than what I said above so either show that or STFU you OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun.

View attachment 509427

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

You made the claim, OCD ridden fat fuck and now you deflect. That is the OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun MO. LOL.

Run along now, loser.
View attachment 509424

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

Nope. You said I posted more than what I said above so either show that or STFU you OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun.

View attachment 509427

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

All I posted was this:

• The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

Poor OCD ridden fat fuck faun. So, you cannot dispute above so you lie. Excellent.

Carry on.

 

[Faun]

Made up nonsense. That isn't what investigators said.

What did they say? I quoted what the committee said.

Which one are you quoting. As you know there were at least 8 different committee investigations of Benghazi.

Republicans' $7 Million Benghazi Report Is Another Dud ...

After a more than two-year investigation, encompassing 33 hearings held in congressional investigations and four public hearings,

Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the Select Committee on Benghazi issued its report.

You said 14 and now eight. Which is it, leftist? The committee I said was the bipartisan one led by Gowdy.

LOL

You mean this "bipartisan" investigation, ShortBus?

"Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee. A select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known that any of that had happened had we not fought to make that happen." - Kevin McCarthy​

I said bipartisan agreement that there was deficiency. Learn to read you OCD ridden fat fuck.

I posted the exact quote if you bothered to read. Are you even to a fat waste of fucking life?

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. Even when shown Republicans have admitted it was a witch hunt designed to damage Hillary's credibility, he shoves his head even deeper up his own ass.

... what a pity.

1. The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

This is all I said YOU OCD RIDDEN FAT FUCK.

LOL

No, ShortBus, that is not all you said. You're actually too stupid to know what you say. What you actually did was reference an investigation that a Republican admitted was a witch hunt to defeat Hillary in an upcoming election. If you weren't such a retard, you never would have quoted anything from that sham of an "investigation." But sadly, you really just don't know any better.

Nope all I said was what you see above. Otherwise re-post what I said you lying leftist OCD ridden fat fuck. You made the accusation now post it or STFU. Get a job yet? 64-year old loser.

LOL

You're beyond demented, ShortBus. Sad, but amusing to watch.

You made the claim, OCD ridden fat fuck and now you deflect. That is the OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun MO. LOL.

Run along now, loser.
View attachment 509424

LOL

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

Nope. You said I posted more than what I said above so either show that or STFU you OCD Ridden Fat Fuck Faun.

View attachment 509427

Poor, demented ShortBus. What a shame. I already explained it, ya dumbfuck. Everything else is just you expressing your delusions on the Internet.

All I posted was this:

• The State Department failed to protect U.S. diplomats in Libya: Clinton and the administration should have realized and addressed risks. (The Democrats' version of the report acknowledges "security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate").

Poor OCD ridden fat fuck faun. So, you cannot dispute above so you lie. Excellent.

Carry on.
View attachment 509429

LOLOLOL

Dayum, you're a fucking retard, eh, ShortBus? No, that is not all you posted. First of all, you didn't quote the report, you moronically quoted wikipedia...

United States House Select Committee on Benghazi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Secondly, the entire quote from the actual report reads...

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/06/27/report_of_the_benghazi_select_committee_democratic_members-honoring_cour....pdf

​

The State Department’s security measures in Benghazi were woefully inadequate as a result of decisions made by officials in the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, but Secretary Clinton never personally denied any requests for additional security in Benghazi.​

​

[emphasis added to highlight the portions you left out]​

Thirdly, you referred to the committee that released the report as "bipartisan" when they clearly weren't, as evidenced by two independent reports coming out of that committee; one by Democrats and one by Republicans.

And lastly, and the point already addressed ... that entire investigation was built on the foundation of attacking Clinton, not searching for facts about Benghazi, as expressed by Kevin McCarthy. YOU revealed that when you admitted you got if from the Trey Gowdy shamvestigation.

Savvy now, ShortBus?