Dems want to pack the USSC

[TroglocratsRdumb]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

 

[excalibur]

Democrats have always hated America as founded.

 

[MisterBeale]

I keep reading in left leaning media that these types of laws are akin to Jim Crow laws, that they favor GOP candidates, mostly because these tactics were used primarily by the left to win elections. . .

. . . but none of these left leaning sites have ever specifically told me how these laws are "racist," or how these tactics used by the left, somehow, made it easier for ethnic communities.

Vote harvesting seems to be a tactic to get low income, low educated voters to vote, when they are not really engaged in the process.

. . and of course, due to cultural differences, marginalization, and implicit bias, yes, POC communities do tend to have a higher percentage of lower income, and higher percentage of DNC voters. . . but? I still don't understand how this is necessarily disenfranchising voters.

These voters STILL have all the same rights to vote, as any other voter.

If they need someone else to hold their hand, and basically vote for them? meh, that isn't Jim Crow or disenfranchisement. This narrative is just false, and a very bad paradigm being spun in the MSM.

. .. . and the MSM talks about the harm of the independent news.

Disgusting.

The oligarchical agenda being seen through by the intellectuals, is just the reverse of that the founders intended.

Mob rule - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Oligarchical Collectivism: The Institutional "ism" That Threatens Our Very Biology

The ism of all isms, oligarchical collectivism benefits the powerful few at the expense of the powerless many. And today, it threatens our very biology.

wakeup-world.com

 

[MisterBeale]

Democrats have always hated America as founded.

If it were just the DNC, the nation might be in good shape. . . I am afraid, the problem is far more serious, and most of the folks here are focused only on the DNC. . . .

 

[kyzr]

Joe Manchin will keep the worst dem policies from passing (filibuster, HR-1, DC statehood, popular vote, etc.)

 

[MisterBeale]

Joe Manchin will keep the worst dem policies from passing (filibuster, HR-1, DC statehood, popular vote, etc.)

For now.

 

[Crepitus]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

 

[kyzr]

Joe Manchin will keep the worst dem policies from passing (filibuster, HR-1, DC statehood, popular vote, etc.)

For now.

I'm waiting for Joe Manchin to switch parties, WV is the reddest of states, Biden did not win one district in WV, so Joe is on the wrong side of the fence for his voters.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Which of them are illegitimate and you'd prefer a Demonicrat replacement who makes decisions on what's hip politically as opposed our Constitution? Go.............

 

[WTH_Progs?]

I keep reading in left leaning media that these types of laws are akin to Jim Crow laws, that they favor GOP candidates, mostly because these tactics were used primarily by the left to win elections. . .

. . . but none of these left leaning sites have ever specifically told me how these laws are "racist," or how these tactics used by the left, somehow, made it easier for ethnic communities.

Vote harvesting seems to be a tactic to get low income, low educated voters to vote, when they are not really engaged in the process.

. . and of course, due to cultural differences, marginalization, and implicit bias, yes, POC communities do tend to have a higher percentage of lower income, and higher percentage of DNC voters. . . but? I still don't understand how this is necessarily disenfranchising voters.

These voters STILL have all the same rights to vote, as any other voter.

If they need someone else to hold their hand, and basically vote for them? meh, that isn't Jim Crow or disenfranchisement. This narrative is just false, and a very bad paradigm being spun in the MSM.

. .. . and the MSM talks about the harm of the independent news.

Disgusting.

The oligarchical agenda being seen through by the intellectuals, is just the reverse of that the founders intended.

Mob rule - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Oligarchical Collectivism: The Institutional "ism" That Threatens Our Very Biology

The ism of all isms, oligarchical collectivism benefits the powerful few at the expense of the powerless many. And today, it threatens our very biology.

wakeup-world.com

Vote harvesting and mail-in ballots under scare tactics is almost the same thing, because they aim at the same type of people.......

A. If you're too irresponsible and lazy to vote on your own, you're likely democrat.

B. If you're easily swayed you're likely democrat.

 

[Crepitus]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Which of them are illegitimate and you'd prefer a Demonicrat replacement who makes decisions on what's hip politically as opposed our Constitution? Go.............

Either goresuch or Barrett, because opposite justifications were used for appointing each, and Bart O'kavenaugh lied under oath during his confirmation hearing so he's right out.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Which of them are illegitimate and you'd prefer a Demonicrat replacement who makes decisions on what's hip politically as opposed our Constitution? Go.............

Either goresuch or Barrett, because opposite justifications were used for appointing each, and Bart O'kavenaugh lied under oath during his confirmation hearing so he's right out.

I read because your feelings and Kavanaugh lied under oath. What lie?

 

[meaner gene]

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Easier said than done. Republicans will never vote to impeach one of their own. We saw it with both of Trumps impeachments, even when there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt with January 6th.

 

[Meathead]

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Easier said than done. Republicans will never vote to impeach one of their own. We saw it with both of Trumps impeachments, even when there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt with January 6th.

How many times can you beat a "dead horse" before you realize it's not going to die.

 

[meaner gene]

Which of them are illegitimate and you'd prefer a Demonicrat replacement who makes decisions on what's hip politically as opposed our Constitution? Go.............

Do I have to remind you, that democratic appointed justices have received overwhelming bi-partisan support. Republicans have barely squeaked by, requiring removal of the filibuster.

 

[Crepitus]

On Thursday, the justices voted 6-3 to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which banned ballot harvesting — the practice of allowing third parties to collect absentee ballots and drop them off for counting — and invalidating votes cast in the incorrect precinct. Democrats argued that both provisions had a disparate impact on racial minorities in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

“Today’s ruling is another blow to voting rights,” tweeted Sen. Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat. “We must abolish the filibuster and pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights Act. And we must expand the Supreme Court.”

“Can we finally stop pretending it’s radical to expand the Supreme Court, abolish the Electoral College, and end the filibuster?” asked Robert Reich, a liberal activist and former secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. “We do these things, or we let democracy die. It’s really that simple.”

“EXPAND THE COURT OR YOU GET NOTHING,” tweeted the Nation’s Elie Mystal

Supreme Court rulings invite new court-packing chatter on the Left, but Senate votes are lacking - Washington Examiner

A pair of recent Supreme Court rulings has revived left-wing activist chatter about court-packing, but no obvious path toward getting legislation to do so through a closely divided Senate.The situation creates a Catch-22 for the Left: they do not have the votes to pass their most sweeping...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

The Democrat Party is at war against our democracy*.
If they can't win, they change the rules.
The Supreme Court ruled correctly that States have the right to protect their citizen's Right to Vote from the corrupt Democrat Party's election rigging crimes.
So now the Democrats want to pack the court with far left radical and racist Democrat Judges.
The Supreme Court is supposed to protect the citizens, not the corrupt Democrat Party's voter fraud crimes.
If they can get away with packing the court they will be able to get away with anything.

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Which of them are illegitimate and you'd prefer a Demonicrat replacement who makes decisions on what's hip politically as opposed our Constitution? Go.............

Either goresuch or Barrett, because opposite justifications were used for appointing each, and Bart O'kavenaugh lied under oath during his confirmation hearing so he's right out.

I read because your feelings and Kavanaugh lied under oath. What lie?

I'm not talking about feelings, dipshit. I'm not a republican. I'm posting facts for you.

 

[meaner gene]

Vote harvesting and mail-in ballots under scare tactics is almost the same thing, because they aim at the same type of people.......

A. If you're too irresponsible and lazy to vote on your own, you're likely democrat.

B. If you're easily swayed you're likely democrat.

Vote harvesting? It's called get out the vote. You just don't like that democrats have a larger pool to motivate.

In short, republicans can only win by limiting the number of voters. Which is ironically "un-democratic"

 

[Meathead]

Do I have to remind you, that democratic appointed justices have received overwhelming bi-partisan support. Republicans have barely squeaked by, requiring removal of the filibuster.

Do you have any clue of what you're babbling about? Legislation has not been submitting much lest a SCOTUS decision.

But it looks good!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Don't need to pack it, just need to remove the one or two illegitimate appointees and have Joe fill the spots.

Easier said than done. Republicans will never vote to impeach one of their own. We saw it with both of Trumps impeachments, even when there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt with January 6th.

Uhm you should of got rid of bill, the precedent has been set

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Vote harvesting and mail-in ballots under scare tactics is almost the same thing, because they aim at the same type of people.......

A. If you're too irresponsible and lazy to vote on your own, you're likely democrat.

B. If you're easily swayed you're likely democrat.

Vote harvesting? It's called get out the vote. You just don't like that democrats have a larger pool to motivate.

In short, republicans can only win by limiting the number of voters. Which is ironically "un-democratic"

Meaner says it's okay for Demonicrats to knock on doors persuading people to vote Democrat with a ballot in hand.

ILMAO at limiting numbers. But if you want to know the hard-core truth, the country is better off when lazy thinking, irresponsible people DO NOT VOTE. Can you guess why, especially considering the left's 24/7 propaganda via all media?

Nope you can't, because you're a coward.

Beyond propaganda, rich how you suggest the Demonicrats have a larger pool to motivate. You couldn't tell by the amount of REAL LIFE support Trump rec'd while Xiden rec'd none.