Democrats Vote against not only the Save Act but also strict Photo ID ONLY

Much more real than illegal immigrants voting, mentally ill MAGA dude.
Okeedokee, Short Bus.


More lies from the serial liar.........................




 
Gore lost every recount.

Keep stepping on those rakes.
So you think Trump won the 2020 election when he lost by 50,000 votes in 5 states.

But you are positive Gore lost....when he was only losing by 500 votes in 1 state before the Supreme Court stopped the statewide recount. How logical.

You're a totally dishonest imbecile.
 
Provide evidence or just admit that you are mentally ill.
More lies from the serial liar.........................




 
Even if that is true, Trump didn't lose from one dude voting illegally.

You've got nothing.
 
And unless you are a discipline of the orange buffoon, you understand there is no doubt.




I disagree. Investigation after investigation. Audit after audit. Lawsuit after lawsuit. Next to nothing.

Even the Heritage Foundation found very little.
I think you missed the point. If you can’t prove there’s no doubt, then there is doubt. All elections should be considered crooked until proven innocent — that’s the only way to ensure they are legitimate
 
No has ever proven any systemic voting problems at the federal level.

We have had the same number of presidents democrat and republican since 1948.

Our wars have politics and electoral within the country.

Now that both parties have authoritarian fascist elements, one will become the Permanent Majority Party.
 
I think you missed the point. If you can’t prove there’s no doubt, then there is doubt. All elections should be considered crooked until proven innocent — that’s the only way to ensure they are legitimate

Get over the lies of the orange buffoon.
 
And at least 4 nominal “Republicans” joined them. The usual suspects.
 


The legislation is a little bit different than described. But it is still moronic.

It deals with the law that requires sex offenders to register. I support the registration requirement for sex offenders.
This bill modifies the list:

This bill would exempt from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.
Same source as linked above.

The question is “why?” Why would a guy 9 years older than a 13 or 14 year old not be required to register for getting or giving head to such a minor.

California is fucked up. That law was proposed in 2020.

Also, check this out:

 

It seems pretty clear to me that Democrats know they cannot win an election fairly.
They don't want photo ID because they KNOW they have illegals or dead people or both voting.
All this nonsense about the proof of citizenship "disenfranchising voters" in the SAVE act is just gaslighting.
They don't want ANY strict Photo ID to vote because they want to cheat.
By the way, Kamala Harris did not win one state that required strict photo id. Hmm...wonder why that is...
For Democrats Black people are to stupid to get ID's For married women the process of updating their personal information is to much for them.
 
For Democrats Black people are to stupid to get ID's For married women the process of updating their personal information is to much for them.

The women has been voting for 30 years.....she shouldn't have to do anything to appease the gullible poor losers.
 
15th post
I think you missed the point. If you can’t prove there’s no doubt, then there is doubt. All elections should be considered crooked until proven innocent — that’s the only way to ensure they are legitimate
You don`t like voters. We get that.
 
Criminal illegal aliens can get college ID's so that would be a big fiat no.
Democrats don't want photo ID because they want to and do cheat. Pure and simple.
You could not use your military ID to register to vote ....under the save act military ids are not good enough, driver's photo ID licences are not accepted, REAL ID driver's licences are not accepted either even though it was required to have a birth certificate shown when getting it.....

A US passport costing $160 is accepted, a birth certificate is accepted except for ALL MARRIED WOMEN registering to vote...the birth certificate has their maiden names on them so married or divorced women would also need to get or buy a copy of their marriage licence where their maiden and married names show the change of name too which is a burden on women that is not on men....

The bill is not well thought out and does put unnecessary burden on certain voting groups which makes it unfair and unconstitutional....

And why aren't the voters already registered made to go through these extremes in order to vote....? For all the existing voters REAL ID is acceptable for them but NOT the people newly registering now....

In the Save Act, the citizens already registered to vote will be vetted for citizenship without the burden of proof of birth/citizenship being put on them individually....the SAVE act lets the local govts check a new data system created to confirm their birth rights.... So they do not have to go through the burden it puts on new voters....

If this new data base can be used to verify the existing voter's citizenship, then why oh why oh why can't it be used by the States on newly registering voters? Instead of making them go through this shit?

Republicans do not want more women registering to vote, do not want more students registering to vote, etc etc etc it seems.....?
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom