‘Absolutely RIGGED’: Critics question Raman’s ‘statistically impossible’ surge past Pratt in LA mayor race

Votto

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
70,139
Reaction score
79,432
Points
3,605

1780949243251.webp


Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt remains optimistic about his chances in the Los Angeles mayoral race despite losing his 40,000-vote lead and second-place position to far-left L.A. City Councilwoman Nithya Raman.

Critics of California’s delayed vote-counting are raising concerns that the primary election may have been stolen from Pratt, as the process has already dragged on for nearly a week.

Pratt’s nearly 10-point advantage over Raman on Election Day slowly shrank in the days following, with Raman eventually taking the lead. As of Monday, Raman is up 3,000 votes, according to the Associated Press.

“Folks, we’re dealing with a fraction of a percentage point difference, there’s still hundreds of thousands of votes outstanding, and LA officials have given us the next 3 weeks to count! Let’s git-r-dun!” Pratt wrote in a post on social media on Monday.


President Donald Trump chimed in on the latest ballot results, calling it “not possible” for Pratt to have lost to Raman “after the big lead he had.”

“3rd World Nation. Rigged Elections!” Trump wrote. “Won’t have results for, possibly, TWO WEEKS, according to officials.”

Political commentator Benny Johnson stated that the recent ballot drops heavily favoring Raman were “statistically impossible.”

Conservative activist Robby Starbuck noted that Raman, a third-place candidate, “suddenly” began winning “1st in every new ballot drop.” He shared a graph showing incumbent Karen Bass gaining roughly the same percentage of votes with each new ballot drop while Raman surged.

Journalist Nick Sortor declared the election “absolutely RIGGED” and called for authorities to open an investigation.

“Raman has conveniently received a WILDLY disproportionate amount of ‘late mail-in ballots’ compared to both Bass and Pratt,” Sortor wrote.

Trump announced last week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles was investigating California’s vote-counting delay.

On Sunday, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli stated that California allows residents to register to vote using gym membership cards, employee ID cards, credit and debit cards, insurance cards, and prescription drug labels.

I don't think anyone is surprised, and I do mean anyone.
 

View attachment 1266943

Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt remains optimistic about his chances in the Los Angeles mayoral race despite losing his 40,000-vote lead and second-place position to far-left L.A. City Councilwoman Nithya Raman.

Critics of California’s delayed vote-counting are raising concerns that the primary election may have been stolen from Pratt, as the process has already dragged on for nearly a week.

Pratt’s nearly 10-point advantage over Raman on Election Day slowly shrank in the days following, with Raman eventually taking the lead. As of Monday, Raman is up 3,000 votes, according to the Associated Press.

“Folks, we’re dealing with a fraction of a percentage point difference, there’s still hundreds of thousands of votes outstanding, and LA officials have given us the next 3 weeks to count! Let’s git-r-dun!” Pratt wrote in a post on social media on Monday.


President Donald Trump chimed in on the latest ballot results, calling it “not possible” for Pratt to have lost to Raman “after the big lead he had.”

“3rd World Nation. Rigged Elections!” Trump wrote. “Won’t have results for, possibly, TWO WEEKS, according to officials.”

Political commentator Benny Johnson stated that the recent ballot drops heavily favoring Raman were “statistically impossible.”

Conservative activist Robby Starbuck noted that Raman, a third-place candidate, “suddenly” began winning “1st in every new ballot drop.” He shared a graph showing incumbent Karen Bass gaining roughly the same percentage of votes with each new ballot drop while Raman surged.

Journalist Nick Sortor declared the election “absolutely RIGGED” and called for authorities to open an investigation.

“Raman has conveniently received a WILDLY disproportionate amount of ‘late mail-in ballots’ compared to both Bass and Pratt,” Sortor wrote.

Trump announced last week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles was investigating California’s vote-counting delay.


On Sunday, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli stated that California allows residents to register to vote using gym membership cards, employee ID cards, credit and debit cards, insurance cards, and prescription drug labels.

I don't think anyone is surprised, and I do mean anyone.
Were the two elections where Trump won rigged?
 
Were the two elections where Trump won rigged?
How the hell should I know?

Do I cast all the votes?

No.

Do I count all the votes?

No.

In addition, the way that the media and education favors the DNC and puts out continuous propaganda at the expense of taxpayers, even if the votes are tallied right, is that not rigged as well?

Yes
 
Last edited:

View attachment 1266943

Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt remains optimistic about his chances in the Los Angeles mayoral race despite losing his 40,000-vote lead and second-place position to far-left L.A. City Councilwoman Nithya Raman.

Critics of California’s delayed vote-counting are raising concerns that the primary election may have been stolen from Pratt, as the process has already dragged on for nearly a week.

Pratt’s nearly 10-point advantage over Raman on Election Day slowly shrank in the days following, with Raman eventually taking the lead. As of Monday, Raman is up 3,000 votes, according to the Associated Press.

“Folks, we’re dealing with a fraction of a percentage point difference, there’s still hundreds of thousands of votes outstanding, and LA officials have given us the next 3 weeks to count! Let’s git-r-dun!” Pratt wrote in a post on social media on Monday.


President Donald Trump chimed in on the latest ballot results, calling it “not possible” for Pratt to have lost to Raman “after the big lead he had.”

“3rd World Nation. Rigged Elections!” Trump wrote. “Won’t have results for, possibly, TWO WEEKS, according to officials.”

Political commentator Benny Johnson stated that the recent ballot drops heavily favoring Raman were “statistically impossible.”

Conservative activist Robby Starbuck noted that Raman, a third-place candidate, “suddenly” began winning “1st in every new ballot drop.” He shared a graph showing incumbent Karen Bass gaining roughly the same percentage of votes with each new ballot drop while Raman surged.

Journalist Nick Sortor declared the election “absolutely RIGGED” and called for authorities to open an investigation.

“Raman has conveniently received a WILDLY disproportionate amount of ‘late mail-in ballots’ compared to both Bass and Pratt,” Sortor wrote.

Trump announced last week that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles was investigating California’s vote-counting delay.


On Sunday, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli stated that California allows residents to register to vote using gym membership cards, employee ID cards, credit and debit cards, insurance cards, and prescription drug labels.

I don't think anyone is surprised, and I do mean anyone.
Hopefully this ridiculously obvious cheating will get the SAVE Act passed. God works in strange ways.
 
The past due “votes” are always 95% Dem because lib loons cant get their shit together enough to vote on time.
 

Here is a link to the article which doesn't make you go through the Blazes paywall to read it:

 
When you actually have a law that makes it illegal to demand I.D to vote in an election, there can be little doubt about the optics.

California and New York is ground zero for the global socialists and China-First International crowd. Your politicians at the federal level do not care how it is viewed, they do not care how it impacts American citizens and their lack of faith in the process, why else wouldn't they pass the SAVE Act?

Your politicians seem to care about your elections just as much as they cared about your border under Biden.

As such China is going to eventually win. The Western "elite" will learn quickly just how little regard their ascended positions mean to the CCP when this happens.

Just as I speak the truth about Canadas decline and the risks to America, I cannot just ignore the optics of what has gone on in elections in the U.S over the last number of years. Fair or not, you are opening up a massive door for your enemies.
 
Last edited:
Conservatives can barely do basic math but want to lecture us about statistics?
We are simply being lectured to by geniuses like yourself about such things as when life begins in the womb, only to find out later that you don't even know what a woman is.

That's right everyone, they can control the weather with their clever climate policies but can't even control inflation.
 
Were the two elections where Trump won rigged?

No. Trump was ahead and stayed ahead, he wasn't losing badly then magically make a miracle come from behind to pull in the lead a week later at the last second.

Funny how the later after the election the counting goes, the more blue all the ballots become.

This LA councilwoman, I never even heard of her. She is Bass-lite--- why would voters vote for two Basses, Bass Major and Bass Lite, instead of voting for the good alternative.

Gee, those LA people they sure must just L O V E how CA and LA are run!
 
Has Kash cleaned up the west coast FBI?

We're about to find out...
 
We are simply being lectured to by geniuses like yourself about such things as when life begins in the womb, only to find out later that you don't even know what a woman is.

That's right everyone, they can control the weather with their clever climate policies but can't even control inflation.
Right wing mathematical experts turn out to be ex-cons who build swing sets.

 
Hopefully this ridiculously obvious cheating will get the SAVE Act passed. God works in strange ways.
Assertions without proof is stupid, and that is what you are being.

Where is the analytic proof.
 
Back
Top Bottom