Democrats Vote against not only the Save Act but also strict Photo ID ONLY

There are 100's of cases in that document of them voting WTF are you talking about ?

No there isnt.

This is what people mean when they tell you that you have TDS...even when evidence is beating you in the face you resist and sit there and go "uhhhh...Epstein.....uhhhhh...Con man...uhhhhh...cant be true...MUST RESIST".
Maybe one day you will wake up.

Trump even had his own lawsuit tossed because he could not produce any evidence. This was even a judge he nominated.
 
The women has been voting for 30 years.....she shouldn't have to do anything to appease the gullible poor losers.
Because your Islamocrat Cult has gamed the system so bad we have no idea who is voting in elections.
 
There`s a white supremacist social club in New Kensington Pa. where women are not allowed to sit at the bar. They`re only allowed in if they want to be humiliated.
Is it called the SPLC Bar & Grill?
 
You could not use your military ID to register to vote ....under the save act military ids are not good enough, driver's photo ID licences are not accepted, REAL ID driver's licences are not accepted either even though it was required to have a birth certificate shown when getting it.....

A US passport costing $160 is accepted, a birth certificate is accepted except for ALL MARRIED WOMEN registering to vote...the birth certificate has their maiden names on them so married or divorced women would also need to get or buy a copy of their marriage licence where their maiden and married names show the change of name too which is a burden on women that is not on men....

The bill is not well thought out and does put unnecessary burden on certain voting groups which makes it unfair and unconstitutional....

And why aren't the voters already registered made to go through these extremes in order to vote....? For all the existing voters REAL ID is acceptable for them but NOT the people newly registering now....

In the Save Act, the citizens already registered to vote will be vetted for citizenship without the burden of proof of birth/citizenship being put on them individually....the SAVE act lets the local govts check a new data system created to confirm their birth rights.... So they do not have to go through the burden it puts on new voters....

If this new data base can be used to verify the existing voter's citizenship, then why oh why oh why can't it be used by the States on newly registering voters? Instead of making them go through this shit?

Republicans do not want more women registering to vote, do not want more students registering to vote, etc etc etc it seems.....?
You don’t have to be a citizen to serve in the military, so explain how a military ID proves you are a citizen, Short Bus.
 
At least you quit pretending they are voting.
This is where this serial liar comes back with. “But…..but…..prove it changed an election”









 
No there isnt.



Trump even had his own lawsuit tossed because he could not produce any evidence. This was even a judge he nominated.
This is where this Islamocrat idiot comes back with “Nuh-uh”……..






Study: 10% to 27% of Non-Citizens Are Illegally Registered to VoteYou




Based on the latest available data and an enhanced version of a stress-tested methodology from a scholarly journal, a new study by Just Facts has found that about 10% to 27% of non-citizen adults in the U.S. are now illegally registered to vote.
The U.S. Census recorded more than 19 million adult non-citizens living in the U.S. during 2022. Given their voter registration rates, this means that about two million to five million of them are illegally registered to vote. These figures are potentially high enough to overturn the will of the American people in major elections, including congressional seats and the presidency.
Background
In 2014, the academic journal Electoral Studies published a groundbreaking study by three scholars who estimated how frequently non-citizens were illegally voting. Based on data for the 2008 presidential and congressional elections, the study found that:
“roughly one quarter of non-citizens” in the U.S. “were likely registered to vote.”
“6.4% of non-citizens actually voted.”
81.8% of them “reported voting for Barack Obama.”
illegal votes cast by non-citizens “likely” changed “important election outcomes” in favor of Democrats, “including Electoral College votes” and a “pivotal” U.S. Senate race that enabled Democrats to pass Obamacare.
The study’s voter registration rate was estimated with data from two key sources:
A national survey in which 14.8% of non-citizens admitted that they were registered to vote.
A database of registered voters that reveals what portion of the surveyed non-citizens “were in fact registered” even though “they claimed not to be registered.”
By combining these data, the author’s “best” estimate was that 25.1% of non-citizens were illegally registered to vote.
The authors calculated voter turnout with the same datasets, but their methodology yielded a best estimate that 6.4% of non-citizens voted in 2008—lower than the 8.0% of non-citizens who stated “I definitely voted” and explicitly named the candidate they voted for. This and other matters led Just Facts to engage in extensive correspondence with the lead author of the study to verify practically every detail of it.
Just Facts then conducted a comparable study that used the same datasets, a more straightforward methodology, and related studies to constrain assumptions. This found that roughly 27% of non-citizens were registered to vote and about 16% of them voted in the 2008 national elections.
As is often the case with studies of illegal actions where enforcement is limited, both Just Facts’ study and the one from Electoral Studies have sizeable margins of uncertainty. This is due to relatively small sample sizes and other possible sources of error—some that could produce overcounts and others undercounts.

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom