What's new
US Message Board đŸ¦… Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Democrats' Jan 6th Bombshell Hearsay Testimony Exposed As A Lie - Trump Did Not Grab Steering Wheel And Demand To Be Driven To The Capitol

MagicMike

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
598
Points
928
Location
New Mexico
You don't know shit about anything. She wasn't lying. She was passing along the assessment by our intelligence agencies, who started with mixed Intel, but then settled on the video protest narrative. About 2 weeks later, obtaining more Intel, the CIA determined it was a terrorist attack and the administration stopped talking about the video spurring a protest.
You can't get through to these Trumptards through logic and/or reason.
That is just the nature of cult mentality.
It is how an entire nation of otherwise good people (Germans) followed a megalomaniac tyrant (Adolph Hitler) over a cliff like lemmings in the 1930's and how 909 people died drinking poisoned Kool-aid in 1979 in Jonestown, Guyana.

Once people are as far gone past the point of no return as your average MAGAT nothing but a forced intervention and a strong deprogramming procedure can bring them back to reality.
Otherwise they just have to hit "rock bottom" with their delusions....smashing against their own, proverbial "brick wall" where their faulty logic fails them totally and completely and their own sense of betrayal and humiliation (may) just open them up to another more rational way of thinking.
Until then they are going to thrash and flail about....whining and bleating about their idolized cult figure (Trump) being some kind of "victim" of one whacko conspiracy theory after another.
They will attack each and every witness that comes out speaking against Trump as a "liar/politically motivated/agent of the deep state/commie/socialist/RHINO/ .....blah....blah....blah, until pretty much every single person in the world is "lying" and Donald Trump and his lackeys are the ONLY ones that can be trusted.

Two things come to mind when dealing with these people:

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE,
and
The Dunning Kruger effect

As far as Dunning Kruger goes my thinking is that Trumptards fit the definition perfectly because let's face it, if you are a Republican voter to begin with you have to be pretty LOW on the cognitive spectrum.....but if you are clueless enough to fall for a cheap grifter like Trump....then you're probably even BELOW that already low threshold.
 

SeaMajor7

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2022
Messages
727
Reaction score
854
Points
883
Location
Long Island, NY
You can't get through to these Trumptards through logic and/or reason.
That is just the nature of cult mentality.
It is how an entire nation of otherwise good people (Germans) followed a megalomaniac tyrant (Adolph Hitler) over a cliff like lemmings in the 1930's and how 909 people died drinking poisoned Kool-aid in 1979 in Jonestown, Guyana.

Once people are as far gone past the point of no return as your average MAGAT nothing but a forced intervention and a strong deprogramming procedure can bring them back to reality.
Otherwise they just have to hit "rock bottom" with their delusions....smashing against their own, proverbial "brick wall" where their faulty logic fails them totally and completely and their own sense of betrayal and humiliation (may) just open them up to another more rational way of thinking.
Until then they are going to thrash and flail about....whining and bleating about their idolized cult figure (Trump) being some kind of "victim" of one whacko conspiracy theory after another.
They will attack each and every witness that comes out speaking against Trump as a "liar/politically motivated/agent of the deep state/commie/socialist/RHINO/ .....blah....blah....blah, until pretty much every single person in the world is "lying" and Donald Trump and his lackeys are the ONLY ones that can be trusted.

Two things come to mind when dealing with these people:

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE,
and
The Dunning Kruger effect

As far as Dunning Kruger goes my thinking is that Trumptards fit the definition perfectly because let's face it, if you are a Republican voter to begin with you have to be pretty LOW on the cognitive spectrum.....but if you are clueless enough to fall for a cheap grifter like Trump....then you're probably even BELOW that already low threshold.
P R O J E C T I O N

:eusa_hand:
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
42,808
Reaction score
37,409
Points
3,615
You don't know shit about anything. She wasn't lying. She was passing along the assessment by our intelligence agencies, who started with mixed Intel, but then settled on the video protest narrative. About 2 weeks later, obtaining more Intel, the CIA determined it was a terrorist attack and the administration stopped talking about the video spurring a protest.
How do you know she wasn't lying, Simp? Nobody has confirmed anything Gossip Girl said. Nobody.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
100,311
Reaction score
25,536
Points
2,210
How do you know she wasn't lying, Simp? Nobody has confirmed anything Gossip Girl said. Nobody.

LOLOLOL

Dumbfuck, I was talking about Susan Rice, not Cassidy Hutchinson. Have someone help guide you through this conversation, you're clearly lost.

face-palm-gif.278959
 

MagicMike

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2021
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
598
Points
928
Location
New Mexico

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
42,808
Reaction score
37,409
Points
3,615
LOLOLOL

Dumbfuck, I was talking about Susan Rice, not Cassidy Hutchinson. Have someone help guide you through this conversation, you're clearly lost.

face-palm-gif.278959
Oh, then you really are a dumbfuck moron. Everyone knows Susan Rice lied. I guess, everyone except you. But then, you are always late to the party...........or never show up.


 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
117,690
Reaction score
20,584
Points
2,180
Two Secret Service Sources Confirm Hutchinson Testimony. The Traitor Did Try To Grab Steeringwheel.


Two Secret Service sources told CNN on Friday that they heard about former President Donald Trump lunging at the driver of his presidential SUV on January 6, 2021.

The pair of sources, who spoke under the condition of anonymity, backed up much of former Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson's explosive testimony on the altercation in the motorcade vehicle known as "the Beast" after Trump found out he wouldn't be driven to join his supporters at the Capitol.

"He had sort of lunged forward – it was unclear from the conversations I had that he actually made physical contact, but he might have. I don't know," one of the Secret Service sources told CNN. "Nobody said Trump assaulted him; they said he tried to lunge over the seat – for what reason, nobody had any idea."
you got the transcript and names? Anonymity don't cut jack. those could be two maintenance men from the women's restroom for all I know. Get the testimony from those involved. They ain't afraid of giving their testimony.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
117,690
Reaction score
20,584
Points
2,180

BlindBoo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
46,576
Reaction score
10,773
Points
2,030

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
117,690
Reaction score
20,584
Points
2,180

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
100,311
Reaction score
25,536
Points
2,210
Oh, then you really are a dumbfuck moron. Everyone knows Susan Rice lied. I guess, everyone except you. But then, you are always late to the party...........or never show up.



LOLOLOLOL

You're such a putz. You claim "everyone knows" she lied, but the truth is ... you're just a flaming imbecile as even a GOP-led investigation determined she wasn't. So who to believe? A GOP-led panel, seeking to find Hillary culpable of something but instead learns the Obama administration was just being fed info from our intelligence community ... or some rightarded nutbag on the Internet who can't get anything right? Speaking of which, have ya learned the meaning of the word, "evidence," yet?

:abgg2q.jpg:
 

scruffy

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Messages
7,539
Reaction score
5,822
Points
1,908
She never lied and always blamed the attack on the extremist who came to the complex with heavy weapons. It is GOP (and their PR friends in the Media ) who purposefully conflated the remarks (aka talking points) about the Riots in Cairo hours earlier, with the Attack in Benghazi.

It's just what Faux and the GOP do to groom the flock.

I was there.

She lied.

For SIX STRAIGHT DAYS

I counted them
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
42,808
Reaction score
37,409
Points
3,615
LOLOLOLOL

You're such a putz. You claim "everyone knows" she lied, but the truth is ... you're just a flaming imbecile as even a GOP-led investigation determined she wasn't. So who to believe? A GOP-led panel, seeking to find Hillary culpable of something but instead learns the Obama administration was just being fed info from our intelligence community ... or some rightarded nutbag on the Internet who can't get anything right? Speaking of which, have ya learned the meaning of the word, "evidence," yet?

:abgg2q.jpg:
Weird how I have links and you don't, Simp.
 

BlindBoo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
46,576
Reaction score
10,773
Points
2,030
I was there.

She lied.

For SIX STRAIGHT DAYS

I counted them
Like I said. You've been groomed into believing the lie.

The GOP had to push the Fauxrage in the aftermath of Benghazi, to cover for Romney's gaffe of criticizing the CiC while US personnel were under attack.

The Talking points always blamed extremist with heavy weapons for the assault in Benghazi.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
100,311
Reaction score
25,536
Points
2,210
Weird how I have links and you don't, Simp.

LOL

Ohhh, you posted a link, huh? :lol:

You truly are the forum's biggest glutton for punishment. You get your ass kicked royally every day and you always come back for more.

Dumbfuck, your link goes to someone's opinion. It's an op/ed, ya flamin' retard. :eusa_doh:

Compared to this link, the findings of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, led by the GOP...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

307vyna-gif.269908
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
42,808
Reaction score
37,409
Points
3,615
LOL

Ohhh, you posted a link, huh? :lol:

You truly are the forum's biggest glutton for punishment. You get your ass kicked royally every day and you always come back for more.

Dumbfuck, your link goes to someone's opinion. It's an op/ed, ya flamin' retard. :eusa_doh:

Compared to this link, the findings of the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, led by the GOP...

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

307vyna-gif.269908
Was this too many words I to your cut and paste, Simp?

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
100,311
Reaction score
25,536
Points
2,210
Was this too many words I to your cut and paste, Simp?

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate

My G-d, you're flamin' insane. Keep reading, ya moron...

There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi

I'll have to explain that to ya since your pre-K reading level clearly didn't understand it the first time I posted it....

Incoming intel was leading towards multiple possibilities. The CIA decided it was a protest. That is what was not fully accurate as would be determined a couple of weeks later. Then keep reading...

but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012

Then the CIA obtained more information and changed their assessment on the 24th, two days after Rice's TV appearances, to be it wasn't a protest but a terrorist attack.

Meaning Rice didn't lie. She repeating what the CIA was feeding the White House and State Department.

Like I said earlier, and you prove yet again, no matter how badly you get your ass kicked, you're too dumb to know it and you come back for more.


307vyna-gif.269908
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
42,808
Reaction score
37,409
Points
3,615
My G-d, you're flamin' insane. Keep reading, ya moron...

There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi

I'll have to explain that to ya since your pre-K reading level clearly didn't understand it the first time I posted it....

Incoming intel was leading towards multiple possibilities. The CIA decided it was a protest. That is what was not fully accurate as would be determined a couple of weeks later. Then keep reading...

but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012

Then the CIA obtained more information and changed their assessment on the 24th, two days after Rice's TV appearances, to be it wasn't a protest but a terrorist attack.

Meaning Rice didn't lie. She repeating what the CIA was feeding the White House and State Department.

Like I said earlier, and you prove yet again, no matter how badly you get your ass kicked, you're too dumb to know it and you come back for more.


307vyna-gif.269908
:itsok:

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top