Democrat socialist candidate calls for “Housing for All” legislation that allows people to break into homes

Not only were they allowed to claim access and use of an empty investment property, they were allowed to claim ownership if they stayed for 15 years and could demonstrate any improvement made to the property ... sweat equity.

This didn't happen often as many squatters had substance abuse issues.
OMG. That is a direct transfer of real property from those who earned it to lowlifes who didn’t. Out and out theft from the government.
 
In the category “bet you didn’t think Democrats couldn’t sink THIS low” we have a candidate saying, essentially, that people are entitled to just take what they need - and if that means housing, they should be permitted to break into the homes of people who earned them.

Just how lawless do the Dems want to make this country?

Ugly as shit and evil as they come.
Probably a lesbian too.
 
What she is proposing isn’t anything new and has been done in other countries like another poster stated and I believe Mexico has those squatting rights also that make it a nightmare for land owners to remove the person from their property.

She is the future of this country unfortunately and things like this will happen because Democratic Socialists believe what is yours is theirs but as asked how would she feel if someone did this too her and you will see the double standard when it happens…
 
/----/ And would the real owner still be responsible for property taxes? Would they be liable if the squatters hurt themselves? What if the squatters were busted for drug possession? Would the real ower be liable?
I wanted to buy some off grid property in Montana and then learned that an adjacent property was already infested with meth labs. Inquired and learned that, yes indeed, If somebody did something similar on my property, I'd be liable.
 
In the category “bet you didn’t think Democrats couldn’t sink THIS low” we have a candidate saying, essentially, that people are entitled to just take what they need - and if that means housing, they should be permitted to break into the homes of people who earned them.

Just how lawless do the Dems want to make this country?

Eventually these communists will get more bold.
One day you'll go to work and when you come back home they'll be squatting in your living room refusing to leave.
 
/----/ They would make themselves immune, at least the top tier democRATs would.
As did the Communists during the Soviet Days and Democratic Socialists lean more too the Soviet Communism than too the Norwegian Socialism.

As I stated in my other response they will have double standards and to add demand their properties be immune to the law while demanding society to obey that law.

It is easy to demand something that is not yours until you have something then you realize you shouldn’t have done that…
 
As did the Communists during the Soviet Days and Democratic Socialists lean more too the Soviet Communism than too the Norwegian Socialism.

As I stated in my other response they will have double standards and to add demand their properties be immune to the law while demanding society to obey that law.

It is easy to demand something that is not yours until you have something then you realize you shouldn’t have done that…
This is how they trick idiots onto supporting them.
They only appeal to the poor or the extremely wealthy.
The wealthy throw in with them to protect themselves and the poor do their dirty work.
 
Democrats also own property.

Sure, but most of them don’t think far enough ahead to realize that it could affect them at some point. They will vote for anything that gives them the warm fuzzies without much thought beyond that. They don’t care who it negatively affects as long as it is NOT them.
 
Democratic Socialist agenda can not work when your country is built on a Union of States and is not built like Norway or even Israel.

That is why the Soviet Union failed because they did not factor in the reality you can not force other cultures to agree to work for the better of their fellow person because of the fact each different State viewed their people more important than the next.

So as you keep in refreshing that list let be clear the U.S. would become a failed State if Democratic Socialists like Cortez or that woman in that article ever got true control because you can not force other States to comply with agenda that will hurt their citizens while benefiting a small minority of people…
 
Sure, but most of them don’t think far enough ahead to realize that it could affect them at some point. They will vote for anything that gives them the warm fuzzies without much thought beyond that. They don’t care who it negatively affects as long as it is NOT them.
Just how do you know that?
 
They all fail.

The so called nordic models are actually examples of capitalist nations

And they always ignore the elephant in the room regarding Nordic countries. They are EXTREMELY homogenous with most families having been there for centuries.
 
Democratic Socialist agenda can not work when your country is built on a Union of States and is not built like Norway or even Israel.

That is why the Soviet Union failed because they did not factor in the reality you can not force other cultures to agree to work for the better of their fellow person because of the fact each different State viewed their people more important than the next.

So as you keep in refreshing that list let be clear the U.S. would become a failed State if Democratic Socialists like Cortez or that woman in that article ever got true control because you can not force other States to comply with agenda that will hurt their citizens while benefiting a small minority of people…
I agree with you, however I don't think Cortez is very important. Switzerland is made up of Cantons and is very diverse.
 
And they always ignore the elephant in the room regarding Nordic countries. They are EXTREMELY homogenous with most families having been there for centuries.
And do they let millions of illegals who can’t support themselves or their families swarm in over their borders?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: DBA

Forum List

Back
Top