Da GUV LIED WE DIED! 9/11 Intentional Destruction PROVEN!

[Gamolon]

Your fucking deranged, psychopath. The antenna does not "start collapsing before the surrounding structure."

I believe he meant that the antenna starts to descend before the surrounding structure.

 

[Faun]

I believe he meant that the antenna starts to descend before the surrounding structure.

Which it doesn't. It falls with the roof when the roof falls. That guy is a fucking loon.

 

[Gamolon]

Watch the antenna on the north tower start collapsing before the surrounding structure...... that happened when the core columns were taken out.

Completely wrong as usual. How many times have you been proven wrong thus far?

 

[KokomoJojo]

Completely wrong as usual. How many times have you been proven wrong thus far?
View attachment 517884

bullshit gam, the antenna drops about 6" before the tower moves. no I am not going to take the time to show it to you frame by frame and do YOUR homework for you since you ignored it before you will just ignore it again.

Of course you wont be able to see it on the shitty inapplicable stills you posted.

The tipping of the antenna happens light years later than the 'initial' dropping of the antenna, which took place before the building visibly went down.

Do you have a clue what that means gam? See if you can give us the correct explaination as to what would cause that.

Otherwise nice try at another failed fake out play, and busted again.

 

[Faun]

bullshit gam, the antenna drops about 6" before the tower moves. no I am not going to take the time to show it to you frame by frame and do YOUR homework for you since you ignored it before you will just ignore it again.

Of course you wont be able to see it on the shitty inapplicable stills you posted.

The tipping of the antenna happens light years later than the 'initial' dropping of the antenna, which took place before the building visibly went down.

Do you have a clue what that means gam? See if you can give us the correct explaination as to what would cause that.

Otherwise nice try at another failed fake out play, and busted again.

LOL

The videos and photos prove you're batshit insane.

 

[KokomoJojo]

LOL

The videos and photos prove you're batshit insane.

Your problem is obvious, and the best way to avoid so much pain is to skip this threads busting debunkers in the future, we know how traumatic butt hurt can be for debunkers when they get busted.

Constantly supplying butthurt debunkers with supersized tubes of butthurt creme is getting a bit old.

Call the state and get on Obamacare because due to the high demand our supplies are starting to run low.

Here you go, heres another tube for you too.

Just apply liberally and dont use it for lube.

 

[Soupnazi630]

All three towers were taken down with controlled demolition.

Watch the antenna on the north tower start collapsing before the surrounding structure...... that happened when the core columns were taken out.

You have no evidence of this.

You failed big time

 

[Faun]

The best way to avoid so much pain is to skip this thread in the future, we know how traumatic butt hurt can be for debunkers when they get busted.

Constantly supplying butthurt debunkers with supersized tubes of butthurt creme is getting a bit old. Call the state and get on Obamacare.

Here you go, heres another tube for you too.

Just apply liberally and dont use it for lube.

What a pity that's all you can post because no evidence of your bullshit claim exists for you to post.

 

[Faun]

You have no evidence of this.

You failed big time

There is evidence of the antenna falling in relation to the roof of the tower -- it all shows the antenna fell with the roof and not before it.

 

[KokomoJojo]

There is evidence of the antenna falling in relation to the roof of the tower -- it all shows the antenna fell with the roof and not before it.

thats because your eye cant see it frame by frame, the bullshit you are pedaling has been proven false 20 years ago, everyone but debunkers knows the hat truss went first. Just more of the usual defective debunking debunkers are so well known for

BTW this thread is about wtc7 if the OP isnt clear enough

 

[KokomoJojo]

I guess everyone missed this!

The Forensic Reevaluation of World Trade Center 7 Collapse
https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf

 

[surada]

Yep now we know!

NIST took 7 years and made it all up, a fake report!

Using NIST's claim that column 79 buckled causing a progressive collapse, something truthers were smart enough to figure out was bs right from the begining, now we have the fea to prove it!

NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

---

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into

www.nist.gov

---

After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

This is pathetic...

 

[Faun]

thats because your eye cant see it frame by frame, the bullshit you are pedaling has been proven false 20 years ago, everyone but debunkers knows the hat truss went first. Just more of the usual defective debunking debunkers are so well known for

BTW this thread is about wtc7 if the OP isnt clear enough

My eyes can see the antenna falling with the roof. They can also see you're batshit insane.

 

[Gamolon]

bullshit gam, the antenna drops about 6" before the tower moves. no I am not going to take the time to show it to you frame by frame and do YOUR homework for you since you ignored it before you will just ignore it again.

Show me Koko. If you can't, your claim is worthless no matter how much you whine and carry on. I just showed you evidence that that the tower top section tilts which is why it LOOKS like the antenna drops first.

Refute it or shut the hell up.

I meant that in the nicest way possible by the way.

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is evidence of the antenna falling in relation to the roof of the tower -- it all shows the antenna fell with the roof and not before it.

Yes but no evidence of controlled demolition.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I guess everyone missed this!

The Forensic Reevaluation of World Trade Center 7 Collapse
https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf

Once again a report made by AE911 trutgh is worthless.

You have no evidence.

 

[the other mike]

Once again a report made by AE911 trutgh is worthless.

You have no evidence.

That's pretty rough when you can't spell truth right. A little Freudian slip there soupy?

 

[KokomoJojo]

This is pathetic...

yep the agencies we pay shitloads of money making fraudulent records goes far beyond pity, its a crime, but debunkers happily join them in perpetrating their false reports.

 

[KokomoJojo]

Once again a report made by AE911 trutgh is worthless.

You have no evidence.

they didnt make the report dumbass troll!

 

[KokomoJojo]

Show me Koko. If you can't, your claim is worthless no matter how much you whine and carry on. I just showed you evidence that that the tower top section tilts which is why it LOOKS like the antenna drops first.

Refute it or shut the hell up.

I meant that in the nicest way possible by the way.

Nope the video is on youtube, feel free to help the butthurt one prove his claim. HIs claim is worthless, not to mention you like all the other flunky posing debunglers simply ignore all evidence, rewind/repeat same old mantra over and over.

Prove your eye can see it frame by frame and maybe I will believe you and faun, until then its just more of the same debunker garbage put up for consumption of the ignoramous crowd.