Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
That's typical of the kind of "science" that Democrats tell us we should be basing economic policy on.On snow levels of where he hangs out, yes.
This isn't difficult. Why is it causing you problems?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's typical of the kind of "science" that Democrats tell us we should be basing economic policy on.On snow levels of where he hangs out, yes.
This isn't difficult. Why is it causing you problems?
Some lakes have tides.Tides are driven by the Moon, not carbon dioxide ... besides, wind waves get higher, not to mention tsunamis ...
You don't know what sea level is? ... go look at a lake, no wind, no tides, perfectly level ...
Some lakes have tides.
I provided the location.Your dodging the issue ... where is sea level 50 foot different? ...
I made no claims on the tide range on lakes. I simply informed you that some lakes experience tides. Actually, to be technically correct, all lakes experience some amount of tide change.Average tide on Earth is 3 feet over 6,000 miles ... not many lakes have that much exposure to tidal forces
No, you have been iniformed of the facts.... what you're seeing is wind waves and probably some boat wakes for a lake that large ...
You're inventing the '3' feet.we'll be seeing three foot waves in Lake Erie all week long ...
Change the subject with another thread.Only part of the problem is sea level rise ... places like the East Coast are also sinking into the Atlantic ... New Orleans was 10 feet above sea level when it was founded ... now it's 15 feet below sea level ... only a foot or two is due to thermal expansion in the oceans ...
I provided the location.
I made no claims on the tide range on lakes. I simply informed you that some lakes experience tides. Actually, to be technically correct, all lakes experience some amount of tide change.
No, you have been iniformed of the facts.
You're inventing the '3' feet.
Change the subject with another thread.
You just keep getting dumber.So, the measurements up to FDR's time are invalid?
Sure.Or do you have proof that it is not?
"Anomoly?"You just keep getting dumber.
The funny part is that you probably think you're intelligent.
Dunning-Kruger.
Sure.
1940, anomaly is about ... 0.0C
Now it's about 1.5C
Math. It's apparently just for liberals.
You blew your credibility with the photos of the statue showing 100 years apart. Have someone else explain that for you.
That's right and it is why you never see me making those dumb claims.
essentially every climate scientist was correctly saying the earth was warming. That fact is not debtable
Cool, you're not dead from COVID. That's unexpected.It is a fact that the taxpayer funded left wing Zionist Fascist
Cool, you're not dead from COVID. That's unexpected.
I spent not quite a year researching climate.There is no problem ,it is massive bullshit, most of all Biden has no scientific cred at all. Bottom 10 ofs law class and gave a whole mock-serious talk on the OMNIcron virus. He wants your money and he wants to take a vacation.Let's start with ocean temps.
We all know the Co2 Fraud claims "warmest ever ocean temps" just about every year. If so, then hurricanes would be breaking out. But the strongest decade for canes is still the 1940s...
Just last summer was "warmest ever." But the cane season was a complete DUD, with just one Atlantic cane reaching Cat 5 for a total of about 15 hours. Water off FLA was called "warmest ever" yet two canes got near FLA and neither got to Cat 5. In 1938, a Cat 5 got to LONG ISLAND, like NEW YORK, a bit further north...
So here we have a classic "what can be fudged and what cannot." It is hard to "fudge" a cane, although cane strength can be "fudged" and in 2014 it was, at least with one "cat 5" that did ABSOLUTELY NO DAMAGE to Mexico when "it hit as a Cat 5."
It is easy to FUDGE a temperature chart. There is a complete contradiction with the claim of "warmest ever ocean temps" and NO BREAKOUT IN CANES....
from Google
1. The first condition is that ocean waters must be above 26 degrees Celsius (79 degrees Fahrenheit). Below this threshold temperature, hurricanes will not form
HELLO. If the average temp was RISING there would be MORE CANES. THERE ARE NOT MORE CANES.
Hence the claim of "ocean temp rise" is CONTRADICTED/REFUTED by Canes.
It isn't hard to figure out what is going on. The oceans are NOT WARMING and the CANES VALIDATE that claim.
The only "evidence" of "ocean warming" is 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD.
Ditto for "ocean rise." The Co2 FRAUD claims "ocean rise." If there was an ongoing net ice melt on planet Earth, oceans WOULD RISE. They AREN'T. Once again, what can be fudged "ocean rise charts" and what CANNOT BE FUDGED.... actual photos documenting NO OCEAN RISE....
Statue of Liberty
Hawaii 5-0 beach
Venice
Norfolk Naval Base
It is time to wake up and get a clue. The Co2 FRAUD is COMPLETE FRAUD, Planet Earth is NOT WARMING, and increasing atmospheric Co2 did NOT WARM ANYTHING....
Notice how every denier loon is also an antivaxxer loon?
Those aren't the actual cults. Right-wing fascist loserdom is the cult. There's a whole list of idiot beliefs that are mandated by the right-wing loser cult. Denialism and antivaxxism are two of those idiot beliefs.
![]()
Climate myths: The 'hockey stick' graph has been proven wrong
Despite repeated claims that the famous temperature reconstruction is at best seriously flawed and at worst a fraud, all the evidence supports itwww.newscientist.com
The scientists who published the data (Graybill and Idso 1993) had specifically warned that the ring widths should not be used for temperature reconstruction, and in particular their 20th century portion is unlike the climatic history of the region, and is probably biased by other factors.
It was FRAUD because the Bristlecone Tree ring data was treated as Temperature data by Dr. Mann when it was actually collected to show the "fertilizer effect of CO2" as compiled by Dr. Isdo and Dr. Graybill in their 1993 paper Detecting the Aerial Fertilization Effect of Atmosphere CO2, Enrichment in Tree-Ring Chronologies who warned it isn't temperature data at all.
Here is a long post covering it with additional link back to this forum to a post I made in 2018 showing it then.
LINK