Courts Squash Democrats’ ‘Most Secure Election’ Lie:

[Harpy Eagle]

and you'll forget all about me.

You finally got something correct! Well done. It only took a bit under 6100 post for it to happen!

I am sure those paying you will be very pleased with you.

 

[scruffy]

You finally got something correct! Well done. It only took a bit under 6100 post for it to happen!

I am sure those paying you will be very pleased with you.

I don't get paid per post.

You seem a little foggy for an OpSec guy. Are you old or something?

I did tell you, repeatedly, that I elicit. Therefore, I emit. A lot, in a very short time.

You can ask, if you want. I'm not coy. (You can elicit too, but there are quicker ways).

I think I've told you most of it already.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I don't get paid per post.

That is good to know, since if you were you would have been ripping off your employer.

I did tell you, repeatedly, that I elicit. Therefore, I emit. A lot, in a very short time.

You tell us a lot of things, and never support a single one of them.

 

[toobfreak]

The ruling said nothing about the security of the election.

No, Dummkoff, states not following their own election laws,
making illegal changes & losing more ballots
than the difference between the
winner & the loser are no
security problem at
all, right?

 

[toobfreak]

Those courts rulings effects future elections and do not make the 2020 election any less secure, nor does it prove any amount of fraud.

VERY GOOD! Too bad that is all besides the point.

 

[Foolardi]

Not rocket science, right?

Scientists don't follow the Pied Piper unless there's a reason to.

Which explains the exodus { not mass exodus yet but close }
of those medcial experts and scientists in the CDC,NIH and
related fields.

 

[scruffy]

Which explains the exodus { not mass exodus yet but close }
of those medcial experts and scientists in the CDC,NIH and
related fields.

A degree does not a scientist make.

Science is a state of mind.

And the AMA is a political organization, not a scientific one

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Of course you have a reliable citation to that.

Just kidding. I know it's pure B.S.

 

[Foolardi]

A degree does not a scientist make.

Science is a state of mind.

And the AMA is a political organization, not a scientific one

Never to be confused with the retired AMC line of cars.
American Motors Corp. Started in 1954 and went defunct
by 1988.Their competitors were Ford,GM and Chrysler.
Chrysler took over in 1990.AMC became famous for Cars
that looked brutish like the Hudson,and Nash.
An updated version of a Packard.
AMC made Jeeps.
The CDC and NIH make fools out of ordinary citizens.

 

[Slade3200]

Honest and factual? Since when?

Since always. Point to anything I’ve said that’s dishonest

 

[BlindBoo]

sorry creating illegal laws to win, is cheating…hence it was stolen

Not true, the bipartisan changes made drop boxes available to all voters.

Real simple.State legislatures Control State Elections.
No debate over this.

One unusual feature of the Elections Clause is that it does not confer the power to regulate congressional elections on states as a whole, but rather the “Legislature” of each state. The Supreme Court has construed the term “Legislature” extremely broadly to include any entity or procedure that a state’s constitution permits to exercise lawmaking power. Thus, laws regulating congressional elections may be enacted not only by a state’s actual legislature, but also directly by a state’s voters through the initiative process or public referendum, in states that allow such procedures.

The Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials. A few states have chosen to transfer power to draw congressional district lines from their respective legislatures to non-partisan or bipartisan “independent redistricting commissions.”

Interpretation: Elections Clause | Constitution Center

Interpretations of Elections Clause by constitutional scholars

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Lastamender]

Since always. Point to anything I’ve said that’s dishonest

You have claimed you are an American. You aren't even close.

 

[Slade3200]

You have claimed you are an American. You aren't even close.

Born and bred. You just can’t get anything right can you?!

 

[Lastamender]

Yep, it will turn to fact just like the flat earth conspiracy.

No, just like the Russian hoax and the spying on Trump. Both supposed conspiracy theories that turned out to be true. Trump was right on both and he is right about the stolen election too.

 

[Lastamender]

Born and bred. You just can’t get anything right can you?!

Born and inbred is more like it.

 

[Slade3200]

Born and inbred is more like it.

Wow, good one!!!! You got me there!!! Inbred. You got it all figured out

 

[konradv]

No, Dummkoff, states not following their own election laws,
making illegal changes & losing more ballots
than the difference between the
winner & the loser are no
security problem at
all, right?

There was no evidence of fraud. You’re asking a technical violation be treated as criminal, which courts have considered overreach.

 

[Lastamender]

There was no evidence of fraud. You’re asking a technical violation be treated as criminal, which courts have considered overreach.

Here is the Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

 

[toobfreak]

There was no evidence of fraud. You’re asking a technical violation be treated as criminal, which courts have considered overreach.

Idiot, you just READ an article plainly LISTING the fraud, all of which is CRIMINAL.

Damn, if we could build highways out of whatever your head is FILLED with, they would last forever!

 

[BlindBoo]

Idiot, you just READ an article plainly LISTING the fraud, all of which is CRIMINAL.

Damn, if we could build highways out of whatever your head is FILLED with, they would last forever!

So when will the 6 members of the Elections Board face charges for their crimes and what will the charges be, pray-tell?