Courts Squash Democrats’ ‘Most Secure Election’ Lie:

You have Bannon on record talking about the hoax Trump would perpetrate on the rubes and all you can do is comment on the photo?

Pathetic.
I have no such record.lest of witch an LP by Bannon.
I did purchase an LP by the guy who inspired the Mickey
Rourke Movie - Barfly -. { 1987 }
Or belligerent drinker and halfass poet who knows it ...
Charles Bukowski.
The records title is .
Charles Bukowski Reads his Poetry
{ limited 100th birthday vomit edition }
 
The Constitution is being abused by those in power. You don't have a leg to stand on.
Unfortunately, they do. Have about half a legal leg. But we're knocking it out from under them, it'll be a while though.
 
Mail-in ballots were mostly submitted by Democrats,

Why is that?


and so the initial election returns were misleading.

No, the synchronized vote dump from 5 different states in 3 different time zones was ASTOUNDING.

The chances of that happening randomly is SIX standard deviations out, statisticians agree on that - it means "virtually impossible", it shouldn't ever happen.

Trump and the GOP knew about this Red Mirage before the election. It's all been well documented.

You mean, SELECTIVELY documented.

The landscape has been deliberately distorted by the alleged perpetrators - and so obviously so, that it casts even BIGGER shadows on them

Bannon is even on tape laughing about exploiting this FACT in order to confuse you rubes.

And then we have that idiotic committee, dredging up edited sound bites as if they were meaningful. Why do you think they hired a Hollywood producer? Duh.

That's exactly why Trump prematurely declared victory before all the votes were counted, at the advice of Alky Rudy.
So what?

Talk to me about election security, and I'll listen.

Yakk at me about Trump, and I'll tell you what a dimwitted dumbass shit for brains little lemming you are.
 
What conspiracy? The one behind the massive fraud. That is a fact.
You're trying to go from A to Z in 3 seconds. Don't. It's not necessary.

In the vote dump, there's a step between legit and conspiracy. It's called coordination.

Keep it real. Stick to the science, the math.

YES, there was "very likely" (6 standard deviations of likelihood, which is like 99.999%) some coordination. The chances of 5 swing states in 3 time zones dumping their votes at the same time is so low as to be non-existent, without coordination.

So, find the method and mechanism of coordination, and the principals involved. Get them under oath, and find out how the coordination happened.

Then and only then, talk about criminal conspiracies
 
Okey Dokey dumb cluck.Since a far majority of land mass is supported
by Republicans where huge Metropolis { think - Batman - and Gotham City }
have the back of scumbag democrat city slickers.
Or take the case where only a couple Republican Incumbents
lost their re-elections.How many democrat Incumbents lost
in 2020 ... Dumbo clucks.

Land does not vote either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everything is a conspiracy with you - can't you understand that some people are simply stupid? :p

Yes, I do understand that many of you are stupid, which is why you fall for all these conspiracies.

See my sig line for what I think of you CT nuts
 
Yes, I do understand that many of you are stupid, which is why you fall for all these conspiracies.

See my sig line for what I think of you CT nuts

You wouldn't do well in forensics. :p

You should study security. Seriously. You're smart, you'd understand it.

Start anywhere, start somewhere you know about. Like, if you're a computer person, start with cybersecurity. At some point security is security, it's the same set of principles whether you're dealing with crooks or spies or plain old hackers, or even just unwanted trespassers out for an evening stroll
 
You wouldn't do well in forensics. :p

You should study security. Seriously. You're smart, you'd understand it.

Start anywhere, start somewhere you know about. Like, if you're a computer person, start with cybersecurity. At some point security is security, it's the same set of principles whether you're dealing with crooks or spies or plain old hackers, or even just unwanted trespassers out for an evening stroll

Been there, done that. Certified as a OPSEC Security manger during my time in the Corps as well as trained in Anti-terrorism and Classified material security as I was a Secondary control point custodian as well as a Classified Courier for a few years while stationed in the WestPac area.

I am also a data geek, I go where the data leads. I was open to the idea of election fraud after the election, even watched the first few hearings and dug into the data presented. I have documented my research on here a few times. So far I have not found a single other person on this forum that has done their own research to see if what they are being told is true. You all just parrot the talking points and when asked for specific data you just pretend the post was never made. This is 100% across the board with you all.
 
Why is that?




No, the synchronized vote dump from 5 different states in 3 different time zones was ASTOUNDING.

The chances of that happening randomly is SIX standard deviations out, statisticians agree on that - it means "virtually impossible", it shouldn't ever happen.

Didn’t say that at all, but your kind doesn’t care.
What do the kind,caring and honest to a fault, Biden
colleague care about.?
Just one or two examples would suffice.
 
Been there, done that. Certified as a OPSEC Security manger during my time in the Corps as well as trained in Anti-terrorism and Classified material security as I was a Secondary control point custodian as well as a Classified Courier for a few years while stationed in the WestPac area.

Okay, fine. So at least you're familiar with protocols.

I am also a data geek, I go where the data leads.

Oops.

You're already busted.

Your security just failed.

Back to the drawing board.

Hey mister, I told you I'm an expert. I didn't lie to you.

I was open to the idea of election fraud after the election, even watched the first few hearings and dug into the data presented.

What hearings? What data?

The relevant data has never seen the light of day.

I have documented my research on here a few times. So far I have not found a single other person on this forum that has done their own research to see if what they are being told is true.

On this forum, I believe you.

Anywhere else, not so much.


You all just parrot the talking points and when asked for specific data you just pretend the post was never made. This is 100% across the board with you all.

"You all".

Funny. :p

If you knew who "you all" is, you'd shit your pants

Even with combat experience.
 
15th post
Been there, done that. Certified as a OPSEC Security manger during my time in the Corps as well as trained in Anti-terrorism and Classified material security as I was a Secondary control point custodian as well as a Classified Courier for a few years while stationed in the WestPac area.

I am also a data geek, I go where the data leads. I was open to the idea of election fraud after the election, even watched the first few hearings and dug into the data presented. I have documented my research on here a few times. So far I have not found a single other person on this forum that has done their own research to see if what they are being told is true. You all just parrot the talking points and when asked for specific data you just pretend the post was never made. This is 100% across the board with you all.
Oh! fer cryin' out Louts.DATA can be manipulated.Unless one thinks the
CIA and FBI would never dream of it.
Then explain the behavior and lies connected with James Comey's
FBI. Or certain players like Peter Strozk and Lisa Page.
Trump had no choice but to leave in tact the many Obama
holdovers that existed in the FBI and CIA.
Or the way the Mueller Special Counsel was rigged.
With a far majority of Hillary backerd toady prosecutors.
None more obvious and vindictive than Andrew Weissmann
with the notable exception of Female ballbuster Jeannie Rhee.
The obnoxious craven lie by former Brooklyn Federal Prosecutor
Jim Walden ... " It's probably one of the most impressive groups
ever assembled for a Special Counsel Investigation. "
Out of How Many Special Counsel ... you toady hack.
Special Counsel are relatively new to the process.
 
Hey mister, I told you I'm an expert. I didn't lie to you.

Yet I do not believe you. As I said you make lots of claims, and support not a one of them.

If you knew who "you all" is, you'd shit your pants

Even with combat experience.

We are now back to this inflated self-worth of yours and your mice.

Do you not have anything new?
 
Oh! fer cryin' out Louts.DATA can be manipulated.Unless one thinks the
CIA and FBI would never dream of it.
:p

Not rocket science, right?

Scientists don't follow the Pied Piper unless there's a reason to.
 
Yet I do not believe you. As I said you make lots of claims, and support not a one of them.

I told you, you're free to believe whatever you want.

I'm not one of those authoritarian boogeymen you seem to be so scared of


We are now back to this inflated self-worth of yours and your mice.

You're being an idiot.

I keep telling you, I'm just a scout. I'm a nobody. I'll be gone in a week and you'll forget all about me.


Do you not have anything new?

No.
 
Back
Top Bottom