Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
First of all, he would also be debating the moderator, but Trump would not lose to Hillary. She already got a taste of what Trump can do when she tried to play the gender card against him. She shut up immediately. Trump will exploit Hillary's baggage to a point where she would be afraid to say anything.
Hillary can't tell the difference between a regular email and a classified email. She already answered the question about the 2 am call, Benghazi? She had to move somewhere she knew she would get elected as a senator. Her knowledge consist of lying, I don't recall, and I pledge the 5th.All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"
Ted Cruz nor Donald Trump could beat Hillary Clinton in a debate. They both talk in platitudes--and never directly answer a question or they'll try and change the topic.
In a one on one debate -- Hillary Clinton would run them through a paper shredder. She is a two time senator, former Secretary of State--they wouldn't be able to hold a candle to her knowledge and that would be evident within the first 3 minutes of any debate.
All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"
If Megyn Kelly put fear into his heart then I hate to see what Hillary Clinton would do, and I wounder would he even debate her or just hold rallies and tell his supporters there is no need for a debate?
Pantsuit is a joke. Only a braindead fool would cast a vote for that old hag.
That's the great thing about Hillary. No matter what the GOP candidates will do to each other, that 'treasure trove' of stuff to be used against Hillary.
I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance.
Hillary's actually a pretty good debater. She can't deliver much of a speech though. She really struggles with a crowd when trying to express some shared belief ... even when she's being totally honest about the belief.
I think Trump would stomp Clinton into the ground. He puts lead weights in his gloves, and hits below the belt. There are no holds barred when Trump is in the ring.
I think Trump would take Clinton out in the first round.
The rubes watching the debate want entertainment, not substance. That's why Trump would stomp Clinton in a debate.I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance.
This is exactly right.
Trump does not know the specific, nitty gritty premises & data points that support traditional Republican positions. He speaks too broadly "I'll make great deals". For nearly every policy he says that he'll do something spectacular and make America win again, but he never gets into the thorny specifics. He offers attitude and confidence without substance. He appeals to low-information voters who simply want a straight talker who will ride into Washington and kick the asses that need to be kicked.
Rubio - who comes off heavily scripted - is at least fluent in Republican positions. He could easily beat Hillary, who completely lacks Bill's charisma and warmth.
Bush 43 didn't have great command over the issues, but he was infinitely more charismatic and accessible than Gore. Trump - at his worst - comes off like an immature bully who pokes fun at people's appearance or personality. He's like a crude high school student, which actually plays well with his supporters, many of whom lack much advanced education.
This is an extremely winnable election for the right. Rubio could easily come off looking superior to Hillary on the debate stage. Trump is definitely a risk, because he is a genuine idiot when it comes to politics. Yes, Trump could definitely beat Hillary - a ham sandwich could beat Hillary - but Rubio is more of of a threat.
Have you seen Bill speak publicly? He is WELL past his ability to wipe anything but the drool from the corner of his mouth. The years have not been kind to him.Hillary's actually a pretty good debater. She can't deliver much of a speech though. She really struggles with a crowd when trying to express some shared belief ... even when she's being totally honest about the belief.
so we'll get bill to take her place he's wipe the floor debating any and all of them maybe hill learned something from him?
Clinton would lay out a detailed plan about what she would do in the Middle East, and she would go over time. The red light would flash and she would keep going. She would name key players in the Middle East and how she would deal with them. Names with which Trump is completely unfamiliar.I think Trump would stomp Clinton into the ground. He puts lead weights in his gloves, and hits below the belt. There are no holds barred when Trump is in the ring.
I think Trump would take Clinton out in the first round.
lol when pigs fly whats trump going to say??That he'd make america great again??,,,build a wall?
That's the great thing about Hillary. No matter what the GOP candidates will do to each other, that 'treasure trove' of stuff to be used against Hillary.
yeah, like the crap they can't prove ... buried treasure, no map.