- Moderator
- #41
This is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clinton would lay out a detailed plan about what she would do in the Middle East, and she would go over time. The red light would flash and she would keep going. She would name key players in the Middle East and how she would deal with them. Names with which Trump is completely unfamiliar.I think Trump would stomp Clinton into the ground. He puts lead weights in his gloves, and hits below the belt. There are no holds barred when Trump is in the ring.
I think Trump would take Clinton out in the first round.
lol when pigs fly whats trump going to say??That he'd make america great again??,,,build a wall?
Then Trump would have a chance to respond.
"She will get us nuked by Iran. Believe me."
And it will be all over. The rubes will eat it up. Trump wins.
This is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
That would be a disaster for Trump.Even though Hillary is not a very impressive debater In my opinion Trumps debate to date suggest no he couldn't.
Trump would lose and lose huge in a 1 on 1 presidential debate. You are going to need a Cruz or Paul to go toe to toe with Hillary and her tag team partner the leftist scum debate moderator.
This is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
hillary and the Canadian
This is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
hillary and the Canadian
Trump would lose and lose huge in a 1 on 1 presidential debate. You are going to need a Cruz or Paul to go toe to toe with Hillary and her tag team partner the leftist scum debate moderator.
she'd have made either cruz or paul into mincemeat. I think maybe...maybe..... Christie
All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"
Half the population has a below average IQ.Clinton would lay out a detailed plan about what she would do in the Middle East, and she would go over time. The red light would flash and she would keep going. She would name key players in the Middle East and how she would deal with them. Names with which Trump is completely unfamiliar.I think Trump would stomp Clinton into the ground. He puts lead weights in his gloves, and hits below the belt. There are no holds barred when Trump is in the ring.
I think Trump would take Clinton out in the first round.
lol when pigs fly whats trump going to say??That he'd make america great again??,,,build a wall?
Then Trump would have a chance to respond.
"She will get us nuked by Iran. Believe me."
And it will be all over. The rubes will eat it up. Trump wins.
are there that many rubes out there ,,,double digit IQers?
avatar,,,write this down ,,,,you heard it here first lol Hillary Clinton will be your next presidentThis is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
hillary and the Canadian
I'd be surprised if Hillary limps to the nomination. She is going to lose new Hampshire next week and Democrats are fickle. They will start voting Bernie because it will be the cool thing to do for a few weeks.
Half the population has a below average IQ.Clinton would lay out a detailed plan about what she would do in the Middle East, and she would go over time. The red light would flash and she would keep going. She would name key players in the Middle East and how she would deal with them. Names with which Trump is completely unfamiliar.I think Trump would stomp Clinton into the ground. He puts lead weights in his gloves, and hits below the belt. There are no holds barred when Trump is in the ring.
I think Trump would take Clinton out in the first round.
lol when pigs fly whats trump going to say??That he'd make america great again??,,,build a wall?
Then Trump would have a chance to respond.
"She will get us nuked by Iran. Believe me."
And it will be all over. The rubes will eat it up. Trump wins.
are there that many rubes out there ,,,double digit IQers?
can we call them republicans?
Trump wins.
Trump would lose and lose huge in a 1 on 1 presidential debate. You are going to need a Cruz or Paul to go toe to toe with Hillary and her tag team partner the leftist scum debate moderator.
she'd have made either cruz or paul into mincemeat. I think maybe...maybe..... Christie
Yeah she isn't going to be stand a chance against Cruz unless he has the flu. The man has an audio graphic memory and is a trained debator
avatar,,,write this down ,,,,you heard it here first lol Hillary Clinton will be your next presidentThis is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
hillary and the Canadian
I'd be surprised if Hillary limps to the nomination. She is going to lose new Hampshire next week and Democrats are fickle. They will start voting Bernie because it will be the cool thing to do for a few weeks.
Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"
I have to admit that Clinton has done a very good job debating so far.
But....her success has not been due to substance. Sanders beats her on substance. Clinton is succeeding with style, which isn't much different than Trump. The main difference is that Clinton is better at selling style. Clinton has demonstrated a strong propensity to avoid direct answers to difficult questions and to re-divert to more amicable waters. The reason this has been successful is because she doesn't employ 100% avoidance. She gives a superficial acknowledgement of the question at hand before diverting or re-diverting into saying more feel good prepared statements.
All in all, Clinton is just as much reliant on fluff and populist pandering as Trump is. She avoids dealing with substance. She is very good at maintaining a mature composure, which helps to create the illusion of "looking Presidential." So far, populist pandering has been easily successful among a target audience of Democrats, when debating amongst Democrats. On debating ability alone, she would easily defeat Trump, as she employs the same fundamental strategy, but at a much higher skill level.
However, one should not mistake this to mean that Clinton will be able to successfully debate any Republican, generally speaking, in a general election debate. In a primary debate the goal is to become the favorite Democrat by discussing things that are largely agreed upon by participants and audience members alike. In a general election debate the primary goal is to win over centrists and undecided voters by convincing them that Democratic solutions are superior to Republican solutions. This is a much more formidable task, and one which is poorly suited by Clinton's observed strategy thus far of populist pandering to a receptive audience in a cookie cutter format.
if need be ,,,,,,,,but you and I both know there's no prison in her future ,,,that's just repub claptrap to make themselves feel goodavatar,,,write this down ,,,,you heard it here first lol Hillary Clinton will be your next presidentThis is all speculation because Trump and Hillary won't be debating
hillary and the Canadian
I'd be surprised if Hillary limps to the nomination. She is going to lose new Hampshire next week and Democrats are fickle. They will start voting Bernie because it will be the cool thing to do for a few weeks.
Is she going to run the country from federal prison?