I read almost twenty years ago that perhaps as many as 2/3ds of LG in a ten year span move through that world and later have children and marry. The best you can say for former "gays" is that they were bi-sexual.
The consensus of the medical community and the courts are the right place to decide these matters, not the weekly Board of Deacons or Finance Committee over at the SBC building.
All gays could be bisexual for all we know, they just choose to stick with the one they find they are attracted to most at the time. At this point in time, you'd be hard pressed to find one that'll admit it if it were true because it would undermine their movement.
And I agree with you that the medical community is the best to listen to, as long as they're not ran by radgay agenda driven psuedo-science. Like the gay gene hunters for example.
Unbiased organizations, sure.
And you probably missed where I said I ultimately agree with the decision, just think that saying ALL children cannot give consent makes them second class citizens under the law.