Conservatives, what pisses you off the most about homosexuals

[g5000]

What does being gay have to do with being a homo?

You can be gay and not be a homo.

Homosexuality is a sexually perverted mental illness. Being gay is just being happy.

Is this your way of trying to tell us you're gay?

 

[TemplarKormac]

I have to disagree. If I was a baker, I would have no problem decorating a cake specifically for a same sex couple. I have attended such a wedding. However, if I did have a problem with it, I would want to have the right to not participate in that event in any respect.

The baker(s), florists, photographers etc. who did not want to work at a same sex wedding delivering and setting up the cake, flowers, taking the photos etc. may appear unreasonably homophobic to you and me, but it should nevertheless be their right if they have moral problems with it.

As that same baker I would refuse to decorate cupcakes with swaztikas for the KKK or other white supremacist meeting, I would refuse to provide a product that in any way depicts pornography or beastiality or polygamy or an anti-gay theme or an anti-Christian theme or a dog fight event or anything else that I might have moral problems with. And even though I am not so pro life as to think all abortion for ANY reason should be illegal, I would refuse to provide a product or work at an event that was in any way pro-abortion.

Just as the baker should be able to refuse to provide products for or work at an event that was pro-life, evangelical, a rodeo event, a Civil war re-enactment, or anything else he/she had a personal problem with.

At the same time the baker or whomever should sell the products he/she DOES normally have for sale to any one of those people mentioned and anybody else who walks into the bakery to buy something.

The difference is in providing the product/service you have for sale to all customers without prejudice and in being forced to participate in something for which you have objections.

Perhaps the baker could warn prospective customers before they even enter their shop. They could post a sign in their window stating:"Due to our abide nag faith in Jesus Christ who taught 'He without saying n shall cast the first stone', we reserve the right to refuse service to skeevy little faggots. God Bless You!'

Same sex wedding cakes are no more pornographic than heterosexual wedding cakes.

And wedding vendors are not wedding guests. Neither are they wedding participants. A baker would deliver and ass male a wedding no cake, but not even see the happy couple. They are working at the reception hall while the ceremony is taking place.

Wedding vendors are nevertheless participating in the event, are present at the event, and/or providing a product/service specifically for the event which is a form of participation.

And no, you should not have to come up with and post a list of every single conceivable concept, cause, activity, issue, etc. that he/she might have a moral problem with and would prefer not to or won't participate in no matter who the customer is. Provide the products and services you do want to offer to all without prejudice yes. But to not provide a product or service depicting something you do not want to provide should be anybody's right.

Many times I have called up a service or seller to ask if they did or offered whatever, and they simply told me no they don't. Just because they offer similar products or services to others does not mean I have any right for them to accommodate me.

If we truly believe in liberty and the right to one's own conscience, that has to apply to everything and not just those things with which we agree.

I have a real problem with accepting legal protection for discrimination based on stereotype. I have a problem with people using faith as a justification for hate.

Interesting...

Have you ever considered that people use their sexual orientation as an instrument of hatred? What if they force themselves on a Muslim? Would you be here saying the same thing?

I have a real problem with people losing rights in favor of others gaining them. It's true, gays and people like me don't have as much rights as a heterosexual male or female would (and I hope one day both sides can get what they want from the law) but for me it seems that we/they are being unreasonable in their demands for equal rights. There is no equality in discrimination, but there is also no equality in demanding that someone violate the basic tenets of their beliefs to suit your sexual preferences.

Something needs to change.

I agree, you need to change your mentally ill behavior.

... Moving on

 

[TemplarKormac]

I am bisexual... so nothing. I can be a conservative and part of the LGBT community if I want to. Being conservative does not automatically mean one hates homosexuals. So uh...

You're bisexual now? YOu know you have to get off the couch first, right?

Okay, most conservatives do hate gays, but when you boil it down to brass tacks, it all comes down to "I think it's icky when it's two dudes," and " My imaginary friend in the sky says it's bad."

Interesting,

That is quite the bigoted attitude not only to someone who is part of the LGBT community, but towards people of faith.

You prove just how hypocritical leftists can be when it comes to tolerance. Sure, Islam punishes people like me with death. But not a single protest from you.

I haven't had a mob of acolytes of the "imaginary man" singling me out on the street or in my home for execution because of my sexual orientation. Seems to me you are ignoring the real source of intolerance.

By the way, I sold the couch a year ago. Perhaps you should get out of that man sized high chair you sit in to berate others and graduate from baby food to something more solid.

 

[Dick Foster]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

They say they are normal and natural when clearly they're not. They are freaks of nature. There are good reasons they're called queers, even by themselves which actually means unusual and not normal. Nature simply doesn't work that way. If left to it's own devices, nature would let them die out and go extinct. It's not nice nor is it ever wise to fool with mother nature.

 

[Nosmo King]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

They say they are normal and natural when clearly they're not. They are freaks of nature. There are good reasons they're called queers, even by themselves which actually means unusual and not normal. Nature simply doesn't work that way. If left to it's own devices, nature would let them die out and go extinct. It's not nice nor is it ever wise to fool with mother nature.

Would you approve of reinstating sodomy laws? Should homosexuality be a criminal act?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Turning sexual proclivities into a political issue is the problem. Policing people's thoughts and criminalizing dissent is the problem. Some of us don't want to see two dudes blowing one another in public but that sort of thing happens at gay pride parades.

What do you have to be proud of?

What are you celebrating?

Buttsex?

They're also trying to force it on little kids in schools under the guise of "tolerance" and then get mad at US for having a problem with it.

Is that how you got the gay? They forced it on you as a child?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

They say they are normal and natural when clearly they're not. They are freaks of nature. There are good reasons they're called queers, even by themselves which actually means unusual and not normal. Nature simply doesn't work that way. If left to it's own devices, nature would let them die out and go extinct. It's not nice nor is it ever wise to fool with mother nature.

So nature is pro gay?

Gays have been around since forever -- when is nature going to start making them extinct?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

For the record, I'm not Gay.

Interesting.

So how in the hell would you know what an ordinary gay or bisexual person in America needs from their society?

Repression, in all forms, flies in the face of freedom.

Curious


So would it count as repression if I went into a Christian establishment demanded they cater to my sexual orientation, then threatened them with legal and financial ruin if they didn't?

Would I not be trampling on their freedoms too?

Catholics do it all the time

 

[deanrd]

Turning sexual proclivities into a political issue is the problem. Policing people's thoughts and criminalizing dissent is the problem. Some of us don't want to see two dudes blowing one another in public but that sort of thing happens at gay pride parades.

What do you have to be proud of?

What are you celebrating?

Buttsex?

They're also trying to force it on little kids in schools under the guise of "tolerance" and then get mad at US for having a problem with it.

Would you consider Conservative policies and claims about homosexuals 'politicizing sexual proclivities'?

It's not illegal to be gay. What more do you want?

What would any American citizen want? The right to work, marry, and live without fear.

For the record, I'm not Gay.

A life without fear? Yeah, you're definitely asking for too much.

Exactly. Republicans aren’t happy if they’re not scaring people.

Especially minorities and people of color.

 

[deanrd]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

They say they are normal and natural when clearly they're not. They are freaks of nature. There are good reasons they're called queers, even by themselves which actually means unusual and not normal. Nature simply doesn't work that way. If left to it's own devices, nature would let them die out and go extinct. It's not nice nor is it ever wise to fool with mother nature.

So nature is pro gay?

Gays have been around since forever -- when is nature going to start making them extinct?

Nature tells you to kill the gays?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

It will take a lot of effort for you based on your idiotic question.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

As the OP said....."Conservatives seem to think that extending freedom to others means losing freedom for themselves."

As long as you understand that is one of the core underlying traits to be a conservative, then you will understand why conservatives have been against the emancipation efforts of virtually every minority group in the history of this country, except the uber-rich.

 

[Nosmo King]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

It will take a lot of effort for you based on your idiotic question.

Is the question too hard?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

Do you mean just men or men and women?

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

They say they are normal and natural when clearly they're not. They are freaks of nature. There are good reasons they're called queers, even by themselves which actually means unusual and not normal. Nature simply doesn't work that way. If left to it's own devices, nature would let them die out and go extinct. It's not nice nor is it ever wise to fool with mother nature.

So nature is pro gay?

Gays have been around since forever -- when is nature going to start making them extinct?

Nature tells you to kill the gays?

Apparently someone believes if nature was allowed to have its way -- it would have made all gays extinct....

But since gays are very much not extinct -- maybe nature is gay....helloooo

 

[Nosmo King]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

Do you mean just men or men and women?

Any and all homosexuals.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

It will take a lot of effort for you based on your idiotic question.

Is the question too hard?

No it is a simplelton's question.
One who insist on believing something as dumb as all conservatives have issues with gay people.

 

[TemplarKormac]

For the record, I'm not Gay.

Interesting.

So how in the hell would you know what an ordinary gay or bisexual person in America needs from their society?

Repression, in all forms, flies in the face of freedom.

Curious


So would it count as repression if I went into a Christian establishment demanded they cater to my sexual orientation, then threatened them with legal and financial ruin if they didn't?

Would I not be trampling on their freedoms too?

Catholics do it all the time

What are you talking about?

 

[Nosmo King]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

It will take a lot of effort for you based on your idiotic question.

Is the question too hard?

No it is a simplelton's question.
One who insist on believing something as dumb as all conservatives have issues with gay people.

If you are a Xomservative and have no problem with other people being homosexual, kudos! Spread the word.

However, the repression and marginalization of homosexuals comes almost exclusively from Conservarives.

My question seeks to know why.

 

[deanrd]

in an effort to better understand your political ideology, I'm asking a series of questions.

Please list your primary point of offense about homosexuals.

It will take a lot of effort for you based on your idiotic question.

Is the question too hard?

No it is a simplelton's question.
One who insist on believing something as dumb as all conservatives have issues with gay people.

How about nearly all?