Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,411
- 25,332
- 2,173
You did complain about Biden when he did it?
He didn’t do it.
Jack Smith made the decisions about prosecuting Trump. Biden didn’t.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You did complain about Biden when he did it?
I will never agree that it's okay for the president to be so highly involved in the decision to prosecute someone that he has personal animus against. That's an entirely inappropriate behavior for any president or anyone holding office really.
I will be open to any facts that would be relevant for the prosecution against Comey or his behavior in office. You're making very serious claims about Comey and refusing to back them up whatsoever.
This is your pretext to avoid having to substantiate your very serious allegations.Your refusal to engage seriously is disappointing on several levels.
This is your pretext to avoid having to substantiate your very serious allegations.
No discussion is possible if people like you merely demand we accept your beliefs without giving us reason.
Indeed, the biggest threat to this country is demonstrated by your behavior, that you believe something without reason because it suits your worldview. As you said earlier, no facts will change your mind. This is ultimately very bad for the country as a whole.
Don't you agree?
My reason for believing it is because I have seen the fbi in general and comey in particular, clearly use their power and office to resist the peaceful transfer of power.
And I oppose that. I support the peaceful transfer of power.
How is that a "threat" to this country?
Because you refuse to explain what you saw that “clearly” shows they resisted the peaceful transfer of power.
It’s a threat to this country of people are expected to believe things without explanation and without critical thought.
For example, what point is the justice system if people like you have decided guilt without facts?
It was all orchestrated by Biden (Administration) and you cheerleaded Trump and his minions investigations and convictions. You are despicable and extreme. We have never seen a president go after his political opponents like this, unprecedented in history. Now you're bitching because it's happening to your side. HilariousHe didn’t do it.
Jack Smith made the decisions about prosecuting Trump. Biden didn’t.
Your "questioning" is just a line of defense, of an idea that you support.
So.... irrelevant and a waste of time.
The point we are at as a society and as two debators, is that you and yours oppose hte peaceful transfer of power and I and the nation need to come to terms with that and decide our response.
My question is literally the only way we can have discussion about your allegations.
This is only a “waste of time” because one of us seeks to debate and the other seeks to bully someone into accepting their allegations as factual without having the courage and honest to substantiate them.
There’s no debate here unless you are willing to engage in one. You aren’t.
It was all orchestrated by Biden (Administration) and you cheerleaded Trump and his minions investigations and convictions. You are despicable and extreme. We have never seen a president go after his political opponents like this, unprecedented in history. Now you're bitching because it's happening to your side. Hilarious
No, it's a waste of time, because you support his action of resisting the peaceful transfer of power.
That’s pretty crazy for you to say since I don’t even know what these “actions” are.
You allege it’s true, but we have no way of knowing if it is or not. You just demand we accept it.
You’re acting like an entitled child.
Just the tip of the iceberg dude
lol delicious
Actually that didn't happen. You have quite the imagination.We never saw a president lose an election and launch an all out attack on the system to try and reverse the outcome (at least not in modern times).
It's been shown that Fannie Willis was working directly with the White House. I'm sure Jack Smith was as well. Corruption is what you cheered. Now you want to allow the interruption of the peaceful transfer of power, hypocritical and dishonest. Keep on bitching though about Trump and he just keeps on going making America great.Career prosecutors made decisions on who to prosecute. Biden didn’t tell anyone who to prosecute.
Why didn't Biden release them? Is he corrupt and deceptive?you mean like the epstein files?
![]()
We discussed it earlier in the thread, you pivoted away from the act of lying to congress to focus on irrelevant details about the lie.
The purpose of the lie was to hide the FACT that he was using his office to fight the peaceful transfer of power.
And you have been very clear, that you support that. As has every other leftard that I have spoken to about this issue.
So, that's a problem for America as a whole to have to face.
What are we going to do about this? A signifcant portion of the population and government are no longer playing democracy in a democratic system.
Why didn't Biden release them? Is he corrupt and deceptive?
Actually that didn't happen.
It's been shown that Fannie Willis was working directly with the White House.
I'm sure Jack Smith was as well
The “details” are essential to understand if the lie is actually a lie. One cannot conclude he lied unless we can understand what the lie is and what evidence there is that it actually is a lie.
It’s bad for America to accept accusations as fact without being able to judge the evidence to support them.
That’s literally the foundation of our system of justice which you consider “irrelevant details”.
So again, what evidence is there to support your claim that he lied?
Not really. You know that the fbi resisted and you support it.
The details are irrelevant. YOu are against the PEACEFUL TRANSFER OF POWER.
And the dems, generally speaking, are right there with you.