Comey Indicted

[Blisterfinger]

Does the President need to be notified if the FBI is investigating his criminal activities?

Your article says "He is not being investigated for improperly disclosing his newly reopened investigative case against Hillary Clinton on the eve of the 2016 election." Nor is he being investigated for predetermining that Hillary Clinton was innocent of the charges of unlawfully transmitting confidential material before his own FBI investigation was complete

So you admit what Comey did to Hillary was improper?

Just two days before the presidential election, Comey informed Congress that the FBI had completed its review of newly discovered emails and had not changed its original conclusion that no charges were warranted.
unlawfully transmitting confidential material. You mean like Pete Hegseth including a journalist in his war plans? Or Trump accidentally tweeting to Pam Bondi?
Following Donald Trump's September 20, 2025, Truth Social post that appeared to be a text message intended for Attorney General Pam Bondi, many observers speculated that he mistakenly made a private communication public. Although Trump has not confirmed it was a mistake, his actions and the content of the message suggest it was likely an error.

It's all about eliminating the malfeasance from our government and that would be you guys. Try to stay on topic

 

[Blisterfinger]

Now we know who's brainwashing your dumb ass

American Greatness, a right-of-center opinion website, was established in 2016 and aligns with populist or nationalist conservatism.

It's so easy to pick your shit apart. Right off the bat this link you provided starts off saying we have no idea whether the current DOJ indictments will lead to a conviction of James Comey
Because you know they won't. They(team Trump) knows it won't. This is just political payback.
Your source isn't being fair. Example? Read this from your source: It may come down to the word of Comey, a known fabricator, against the testimony of his former subordinate, Andrew McCabe, an admitted liar. Take your pick.

He's a known fabricator? Who knows him as a fabricator? Do you mean when he opened up the case against Hillary and helped Trump win? Then I agree with you. For that, he should go to prison.

So you're saying that it's okay that James Comey lied to Congress?

 

[sealybobo]

So you're saying that it's okay that James Comey lied to Congress?

I'm saying Trump doesn't have a case. He had to find a DEI candidate to try the case

As I mentioned here, ABC reported that the lie charged in the Jim Comey indictment pertains to whether he authorized Dan Richman to share information anonymously, not whether he authorized Andrew McCabe to do so.

more likely we’ll obtain proof that Kash Patel lied to Congress as a result of this prosecution than that Jim Comey did.

It's a long story but ultimately, this is bullshit.

 

[Blisterfinger]

I'm saying Trump doesn't have a case. He had to find a DEI candidate to try the case

As I mentioned here, ABC reported that the lie charged in the Jim Comey indictment pertains to whether he authorized Dan Richman to share information anonymously, not whether he authorized Andrew McCabe to do so.

more likely we’ll obtain proof that Kash Patel lied to Congress as a result of this prosecution than that Jim Comey did.

It's a long story but ultimately, this is bullshit.

So you're saying it's okay that Comey lied to Congress. Glad that you're finally realizing more about what the charges are, no longer playing stupid. I understand that you're upset that Trump is playing the same games that you did for the last 10 years. You better suck it up because it's just the beginning LOL

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/09/28/devin_nunes_comey_indictment_should_be_first_part_of_a_grand_conspiracy_charge_against_about_two_dozen_characters.html

 

[Zincwarrior]

I'm saying Trump doesn't have a case. He had to find a DEI candidate to try the case

As I mentioned here, ABC reported that the lie charged in the Jim Comey indictment pertains to whether he authorized Dan Richman to share information anonymously, not whether he authorized Andrew McCabe to do so.

more likely we’ll obtain proof that Kash Patel lied to Congress as a result of this prosecution than that Jim Comey did.

It's a long story but ultimately, this is bullshit.

SO if Comey had just posted it on Twit(ter) like Patel does it would have been fine? Ok.

 

[sealybobo]

SO if Comey had just posted it on Twit(ter) like Patel does it would have been fine? Ok.

Patel lied about how many times Trump is in the Epstein file. Patel lied and said he has not read the Epstein file yet. That's a lie.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Patel lied about how many times Trump is in the Epstein file. Patel lied and said he has not read the Epstein file yet. That's a lie.

Sounds like jail time to me.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Patel lied about how many times Trump is in the Epstein file. Patel lied and said he has not read the Epstein file yet. That's a lie.

Do you have proof of this?

 

[sealybobo]

Do you have proof of this?

Oh yes we do

Kash Patel Lied Under Oath to Cover Up for Epstein’s Clients

The Dangers of an FBI Director Lying Under Oath When the FBI Director sits before Congress, the stakes are nothing less than the integrity of American democracy. The Bureau’s top…

sfl.media

Patel repeatedly asserted that the Bureau has “no credible information” that Epstein trafficked girls or young women to other individuals. He defended the FBI’s decision to limit public releases of the so-called “Epstein files” on legal grounds such as grand jury secrecy and court orders. He also admitted he has not personally reviewed all materials and dodged questions about references to Trump in Epstein’s records.

Patel’s “no credible information” claim runs headlong into a mountain of evidence:

• Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction: In 2021, Maxwell was convicted in federal court of aiding Epstein’s abuse of multiple girls and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Her verdict rested on victim testimony establishing recruitment, grooming, and exploitation a trafficking scheme that clearly extended beyond Epstein himself.
• Victims and settlements: The Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program paid out over $120 million to around 150 survivors. That scale of abuse demonstrates a pattern far larger than one man acting alone.
• Prince Andrew settlement: Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit alleging she was trafficked by Epstein and abused by Prince Andrew ended in a multimillion-dollar settlement. While Andrew denied wrongdoing, the case underscores how Epstein’s network reached into the highest levels of power.

Patel’s testimony also contradicts members of his own party. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, said publicly during the House hearing that the FBI has information pointing to “at least 20” suspected clients derived from witness statements and other evidence. That claim directly undercuts Patel’s assertion

Patel tried to close the book on Epstein’s clients by declaring there are none. But history, court rulings, victim settlements, and even members of his own party say otherwise. The evidence overwhelmingly points to a trafficking enterprise that reached into elite circles, facilitated by Epstein and Maxwell, and protected by secrecy and influence.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Oh yes we do

Kash Patel Lied Under Oath to Cover Up for Epstein’s Clients

The Dangers of an FBI Director Lying Under Oath When the FBI Director sits before Congress, the stakes are nothing less than the integrity of American democracy. The Bureau’s top…

sfl.media

Patel repeatedly asserted that the Bureau has “no credible information” that Epstein trafficked girls or young women to other individuals. He defended the FBI’s decision to limit public releases of the so-called “Epstein files” on legal grounds such as grand jury secrecy and court orders. He also admitted he has not personally reviewed all materials and dodged questions about references to Trump in Epstein’s records.

Patel’s “no credible information” claim runs headlong into a mountain of evidence:

• Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction: In 2021, Maxwell was convicted in federal court of aiding Epstein’s abuse of multiple girls and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Her verdict rested on victim testimony establishing recruitment, grooming, and exploitation a trafficking scheme that clearly extended beyond Epstein himself.
• Victims and settlements: The Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program paid out over $120 million to around 150 survivors. That scale of abuse demonstrates a pattern far larger than one man acting alone.
• Prince Andrew settlement: Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit alleging she was trafficked by Epstein and abused by Prince Andrew ended in a multimillion-dollar settlement. While Andrew denied wrongdoing, the case underscores how Epstein’s network reached into the highest levels of power.

Patel’s testimony also contradicts members of his own party. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, said publicly during the House hearing that the FBI has information pointing to “at least 20” suspected clients derived from witness statements and other evidence. That claim directly undercuts Patel’s assertion

Patel tried to close the book on Epstein’s clients by declaring there are none. But history, court rulings, victim settlements, and even members of his own party say otherwise. The evidence overwhelmingly points to a trafficking enterprise that reached into elite circles, facilitated by Epstein and Maxwell, and protected by secrecy and influence.

Then don't you think you should bring charges? If you don't you are just chicken liddling and lying! We are bringing charges against Comey for a very good reason. We'll see how you do LOL

 

[schmidlap]

Promises kept

This petty vendetta will fizzle.

The convicted felon continually whined about locking Hillary up.

His noxious emissions are to entertain his MAGAsouls.

How much court time did he waste with his dozens of frivolous legal challenges to the 2020 election after he lost and couldn't handle it?

 

[Blisterfinger]

Oh yes we do

Kash Patel Lied Under Oath to Cover Up for Epstein’s Clients

The Dangers of an FBI Director Lying Under Oath When the FBI Director sits before Congress, the stakes are nothing less than the integrity of American democracy. The Bureau’s top…

sfl.media

Patel repeatedly asserted that the Bureau has “no credible information” that Epstein trafficked girls or young women to other individuals. He defended the FBI’s decision to limit public releases of the so-called “Epstein files” on legal grounds such as grand jury secrecy and court orders. He also admitted he has not personally reviewed all materials and dodged questions about references to Trump in Epstein’s records.

Patel’s “no credible information” claim runs headlong into a mountain of evidence:

• Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction: In 2021, Maxwell was convicted in federal court of aiding Epstein’s abuse of multiple girls and sentenced to 20 years in prison. Her verdict rested on victim testimony establishing recruitment, grooming, and exploitation a trafficking scheme that clearly extended beyond Epstein himself.
• Victims and settlements: The Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program paid out over $120 million to around 150 survivors. That scale of abuse demonstrates a pattern far larger than one man acting alone.
• Prince Andrew settlement: Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit alleging she was trafficked by Epstein and abused by Prince Andrew ended in a multimillion-dollar settlement. While Andrew denied wrongdoing, the case underscores how Epstein’s network reached into the highest levels of power.

Patel’s testimony also contradicts members of his own party. Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, said publicly during the House hearing that the FBI has information pointing to “at least 20” suspected clients derived from witness statements and other evidence. That claim directly undercuts Patel’s assertion

Patel tried to close the book on Epstein’s clients by declaring there are none. But history, court rulings, victim settlements, and even members of his own party say otherwise. The evidence overwhelmingly points to a trafficking enterprise that reached into elite circles, facilitated by Epstein and Maxwell, and protected by secrecy and influence.

Keeping you up to date. You're welcome

This is a reckoning of James Comey’s own making — and Dems for weaponizing justice system first

In the wake of James Comey’s indictment, Democrats like Richard Blumenthal and Eric Swalwell are issuing dark warnings with a straight face that “what goes around comes around.”

nypost.com

 

[Correll]

DoJ regulations say that prosecutors shouldn’t pursue cases that aren’t more likely to secure a conviction.

The reason is obvious. The judicial system isn’t supposed to be flooded with shitty cases and people shouldn’t be subjected to that kind of prosecution.

The guy used his office to RESIST the peaceful transfer of power.

Your support of this is you opposing Democracy.

 

[Correll]

I bet if I look on Fox News or Newsmax they're talking about Democrats not respecting the peaceful transfer of power. Such spin coming from you insurrectionists. This is clearly payback from the authoritarian, autocratic, fascist emperor with no clothes.

Dude. Please try to be less of a rude asshole.

Trump's last appointee said "sorry no evidence Comey is guilty" much like the people around him said the election wasn't rigged. He got rid of all them. Replace them with loyalists like you. 20 something media influencers. And a tax lawyer who's never tried a case is going to take Comey to trial?

Do you think she is Tom Cruise or something?

View attachment 1167576

Your support of this is you opposing the peaceful transfer of power.

Elections are supposed to mean something. If everytime we "win" your side just kicks up such a hissy fit that we are unable to actually get anything done,


then our democracy is at that point, dead.


That is what you are going for, right here, right now.

 

[Marener]

The guy used his office to RESIST the peaceful transfer of power.

Your support of this is you opposing Democracy.

Man, you’re just insufferable.

 

[Correll]

Man, you’re just insufferable.

I mean, you can talk shit if you want. But in reality, that's what he did, and that's what, at some point, if your side keeps it up,

that is what my side will have to eventually deal with.


If we never get our turn(s), then it is dumb of us to even play the game.

 

[Marener]

that's what he did

Yet you won’t discuss how that happened.

Because your weak and pathetic, just a ball of spun up rage, manipulated by a piece of shit like Trump.

 

[Correll]

Yet you won’t discuss how that happened.

Because your weak and pathetic, just a ball of spun up rage, manipulated by a piece of shit like Trump.

You want to bog the discussion down in a meaningless back and forth over details and stonewalling over nothing.


The importance of this is that he was abusing his office to fight against the peaceful transfer of power.

We both know this. YOu support it, I oppose it.


If you were operating in good faith, the next step in the discussion would be what are the ramifications of this development in the modern Left.

 

[Marener]

You want to bog the discussion down in a meaningless back and forth over details and stonewalling over nothing.

If you’re not willing to explain or defend your assertion, then it’s not actually a discussion.

You’re just showing that your dogma is baseless and unable to be defended.

So you just whine like an entitled child.

 

[Correll]

If you’re not willing to explain or defend your assertion, then it’s not actually a discussion.

You’re just showing that your dogma is baseless and unable to be defended.

So you just whine like an entitled child.

Buddy. I'm happy to defend my ideas or beliefs.


You are clearly wanting to bog this discussion down in meaningless quibbles, over nothing to avoid the real issues.


And that's just dumb. And cowardly.