Comey Indicted

Of course it happened. We had lots of evidence presented in the indictment and hearings for the January 6th committee.



That’s a lie.



Prove it.
No, he was never convicted of any of it. As a matter of fact Jack Smith's case fell apart and was dismissed. You are terribly misinformed. You should step out of your info bubble once in awhile.
Is that proof enough for you? Jack Smith is a proven crackpot!
Why do you want to stop the peaceful transfer of power here? You are so interested and motivated to jail Trump and all of his people that you forgot about yourself LOL
 
No, he was never convicted of any of it. As a matter of fact Jack Smith's case fell apart and was dismissed. You are terribly misinformed. You should step out of your info bubble once in awhile.
Is that proof enough for you? Jack Smith is a proven crackpot!
Why do you want to stop the peaceful transfer of power here? You are so interested and motivated to jail Trump and all of his people that you forgot about yourself LOL
Jack Smith's cases were proceeding through the courts right up until Trump was elected and took office. The only reason they are not ongoing at this time is that the DoJ cannot prosecute the Trump. They didn't fall apart.

The substantive facts behind the cases against Trump were never challenged. It was all in process.

As opposed to the Comey prosecution, which has few if any substantive facts.
 
Jack Smith's cases were proceeding through the courts right up until Trump was elected and took office. The only reason they are not ongoing at this time is that the DoJ cannot prosecute the Trump. They didn't fall apart.

The substantive facts behind the cases against Trump were never challenged. It was all in process.

As opposed to the Comey prosecution, which has few if any substantive facts.
Payback is a ***** my friend LOL.. Hahaha you are being exposed as we speak. Jack Smith's case fell apart, proven biased and contrived by a corrupt Administration. :popcorn:
 
Again, you demand we accept your allegations as factual and refuse to substantiate them.

This is how a child behaves.


You have strongly but incoherently stated that you support Comey using his office to RESIST the peaceful transfer of power.

Your attempt to muddy the waters, to distract from the meaning of your words, is

immoral and cowardly.
 
]
You have strongly but incoherently stated that you support Comey using his office to RESIST the peaceful transfer of power.

I’ve stated no such thing. You’re now lazy, entitled AND dishonest.

A corrupt president should be resisted by people who swear an oath to the constitution.

This has nothing to do with the “peaceful transfer of power”.
 
]

I’ve stated no such thing. You’re now lazy, entitled AND dishonest.

A corrupt president should be resisted by people who swear an oath to the constitution.

This has nothing to do with the “peaceful transfer of power”.


lol. You deny your support of the mutiny and then immediately offer your justification and defense of the mutiny.


YOur shit talk beyond that is irrelevant.

The fact remains. THe dems as a group are not playing Democracy anymore.


This is a big problem for America. We need to fix this.
 
lol. You deny your support of the mutiny and then immediately offer your justification and defense of the mutiny.

YOur shit talk beyond that is irrelevant.

The fact remains. THe dems as a group are not playing Democracy anymore.


This is a big problem for America. We need to fix this.

All I said is that government officials should resist corruption.

That’s a problem for America?

Really?
 
According to MAGA, the country is doomed unless civil servants stop telling the populace what the corrupt government is doing.

Keep your mouths shut. For Democracy!
 
]

I’ve stated no such thing. You’re now lazy, entitled AND dishonest.

A corrupt president should be resisted by people who swear an oath to the constitution.

This has nothing to do with the “peaceful transfer of power”.
Thank God we don't have a corrupt president. Just because you say Trump is doesn't make it true. Comey interfered with the peaceful transfer of power by lying to Congress. Now he must pay
 
It’s corrupt for the president to tell the DoJ to protect his political allies who broke the law, isn’t it?
I think it was Obama who set the standard for this. maybe you should study up? Don't depend on me for lessons
 
I think it was Obama who set the standard for this. maybe you should study up? Don't depend on me for lessons

This is typical MAGA rationale.

They spent decades convincing you that everyone was corrupt. It wasn’t true but you believed it.

That way when your authoritarians got into power, and openly act corruptly, you shrug your shoulders and say “everyone does it”.
 
All I said is that government officials should resist corruption.

That’s a problem for America?

Really?


In context your meaning was comopletely clear. You were retardly spinning Comey illegal and treasonous activities as "resisting corruption".


That was retarded and cowardly.

But your meaning was clear and so I accepted that and moved the discussion forward.


If you support the RESIST, then any discussion on details of the RESIST is really quite, meaningless.
 
This is typical MAGA rationale.

They spent decades convincing you that everyone was corrupt. It wasn’t true but you believed it.

That way when your authoritarians got into power, and openly act corruptly, you shrug your shoulders and say “everyone does it”.
Wasn't Eric holder Obama's wingman? You didn't cry authoritarian then. Precedent set, now it's time to clean up
 
15th post
In context your meaning was comopletely clear. You were retardly spinning Comey illegal and treasonous activities as "resisting corruption".

That was retarded and cowardly.

But your meaning was clear and so I accepted that and moved the discussion forward.

If you support the RESIST, then any discussion on details of the RESIST is really quite, meaningless.

There is no real context since you’re been childishly refusing to discuss what Comey actually did.

See, that’s the problem with your shitty argument.

But as you have demonstrated, the ambiguity is intentional. It allows you to just say whatever you feel like and act superior.

What did Comey do that was illegal and treasonous?
 
Wasn't Eric holder Obama's wingman? You didn't cry authoritarian then. Precedent set, now it's time to clean up

Who did Obama tell Holder to prosecute that was his political enemy?
 
There is no real context since you’re been childishly refusing to discuss what Comey actually did.

See, that’s the problem with your shitty argument.

But as you have demonstrated, the ambiguity is intentional. It allows you to just say whatever you feel like and act superior.

What did Comey do that was illegal and treasonous?


Nope. The point of his actions is his intent. A retarded back and forth about the exact details of what he leaked and the wording of his lies,

is ******* retarded.
 
Nope. The point of his actions is his intent. A retarded back and forth about the exact details of what he leaked and the wording of his lies,

is ******* retarded.

As far as we know, he only “leaked” the nature of his discussion with Trump where Trump asked him to ignore Flynn’s crime.

Don’t you agree that telling law enforcement to ignore the crimes of his ally is kind of corrupt?
 
Back
Top Bottom