Republicans Add Insult to Illness
Greed, germs and the art of no deal.

By
Paul Krugman
Opinion Columnist
- March 23, 2020, 6:24 p.m. ET
Mitch McConnell speaking to reporters on Sunday after a motion in the Senate to proceed on the coronavirus financial stimulus bill failed.Credit...Erin Scott for The New York Times
If you want a quick summary of the state of play over fiscal stimulus legislation, here it is: Republicans insist that we should fight a plague with trickle-down economics and crony capitalism. Democrats, for some reason, donāt agree, and think we should focus on directly helping Americans in need.
And if legislation is stalled, as it appears to be as I write this (although things change fast when weāre on Covid time), itās because Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, is holding needy Americans hostage in an attempt to blackmail Democrats into giving Donald Trump a $500 billion slush fund.
First, letās talk about the nature of the economic crisis we face. At the worst point in the 2007-2009 recession, America was losing around 800,000 jobs per month. Right now, weāre probably losing several million jobs every week.
Whatās causing these job losses? So far itās not what usually happens in a recession, when businesses lay off workers because consumers arenāt spending enough. What weāre seeing instead are the effects of social distancing: restaurants, entertainment venues and many other establishments have been closed to limit the spread of the coronavirus. Now, while social distancing is currently driving employment destruction, there will eventually be a second, more conventional round of job losses as distressed families and businesses cut back on spending. So there is also a case for stimulus to sustain overall spending ā although helping Americans in need will provide much of that stimulus, by also helping them continue to spend.So whatās in the stimulus bill that McConnell is trying to ram through the Senate? It grudgingly provides some, but only some, of the aid Americans in distress will need. Funny, isnāt it, how helping ordinary Americans is always framed as a āDemocratic demandā? And even there the legislation includes poison pills, like a provision that would deny aid to many nonprofit institutions like nursing homes and group homes for the disabled.But it also includes a $500 billion slush fund for corporations that the Trump administration could allocate at its discretion, with essentially no oversight. This isnāt just terrible policy; itās an insult to our intelligence
https://www.nytimes.com/article/easy-recipes-coronavirus.html?algo=bandit-story_desk_filter&fellback=false&imp_id=975667981&imp_id=895782016&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article®ion=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/parenting/coronavirus-divorce-coparenting.html?algo=bandit-story_desk_filter&fellback=false&imp_id=119293399&imp_id=770557884&action=click&module=editorContent&pgtype=Article®ion=CompanionColumn&contentCollection=Trending
And we neither can nor should bring those jobs back until the pandemic has faded. What this tells us is that right now our highest priority isnāt job creation, itās disaster relief: giving families and small businesses that have lost their incomes enough money to afford necessities while the shutdown lasts. Oh, and providing generous aid to hospitals, clinics and other health care providers in this time of incredible stress.
After all, it would be hard to justify giving any administration that kind of power to reward its friends and punish those it considers enemies. Itās almost inconceivable that anyone would propose giving such authority to the Trump administration.
Remember, weāve had more than three years to watch this administration in action. Weāve seen Trump refuse to disclose anything about his financial interests, amid abundant evidence that he is
profiting at the publicās expense. Trumpās trade war has been notable for the way in which favored companies somehow manage to get
tariff exemptions while others are denied. And as you read this, Trump is
refusing to use his authority to require production of essential medical gear.
So it would be totally out of character for this administration to allocate huge sums fairly and in the public interest.
Cronyism aside, thereās also the issue of competence. Why would you give vast discretionary power to a team that utterly botched the response to the coronavirus because Trump didnāt want to hear bad news? Why would you place economic recovery efforts in the hands of people who were
assuring us just weeks ago that the virus was contained and the economy was āholding up nicelyā?
Finally, weāve just had a definitive test of the underlying premise of the McConnell slush fund ā that if you give corporations money without strings attached they will use it for the benefit of workers and the economy as a whole. In 2017 Republicans rammed through a huge
corporate tax cut, which they assured us would lead to higher wages and surging business investment.
Neither of these things happened; instead, corporations basically used the money to buy back their own stock. Why would this time be any different?
As I write this, Republicans are ranting that Democrats are sabotaging the economy by refusing to pass McConnellās bill ā which is a bit rich for those who remember the G.O.P.ās scorched-earth opposition to everything Barack Obama proposed. But in any case, if McConnell really wants action, he could get it easily either by dropping his demand for a Trump-controlled slush fund or by passing the stimulus bill House Democrats are
likely to offer very soon.
And maybe that will happen within a few days. As I said, weāre now living on Covid time. But right now Republicans seem dead set on exploiting a crisis their own president helped create by his refusal to take the pandemic seriously.