Climate Change Consensus Is Virtually Unanimous:

It is still cold here...
me too. also, does unanimous need "virtually" in front of it ?? isn't that jumbo shrimp ??

isn't the term unanimous a free stand alone word ??, it used to be. now it's virtually improbable.
 
Last edited:
It is still cold here...
me too.


65 degrees, beautiful and sunny in south louisiana today. fall here is wonderful.
awesome. this is such an amazing country with so many climate zones to choose from. people should keep moving until they find their own zone. louisiana is beautiful anytime of the year. you guys show our country that life goes on even after a katrina. America is proud of you for that. and it shows, because we as a country have always held that high standard. south carolina and the west now.

which makes me wonder, when the global warmalists attach katrina and/or specific disasters to their cause.
speaking of hypocritical disasters, isn't al gore making 500 times as much as one of the pilots for his jets.

what the heck we may as well get it all out there right now... isn't the corporation for public broadcasting a corporation ??
 
Last edited:
It is still cold here...
me too.


65 degrees, beautiful and sunny in south louisiana today. fall here is wonderful.
awesome. this is such an amazing country with so many climate zones to choose from. people should keep moving until they find their own zone. louisiana is beautiful anytime of the year. you guys show our country that life goes on even after a katrina. America is proud of you for that. and it shows, because we as a country have always held that high standard. south carolina and the west now.

which makes me wonder, when the global warmalists attach katrina and/or specific disasters to their cause.
speaking of hypocritical disasters, isn't al gore making 500 times as much as one of the pilots for his jets.

what the heck we may as well get it all out there right now... isn't the corporation for public broadcasting a corporation ??


yep, and according to libs all corporations are evil and must be destroyed.
 
Tell me again, How do the hoaxers make money off of the Climate change scam?

One James Hansen who is considered the grand father of AGW movement (some credit another), went before Congress and blamed man for his Nazi environmentalist ways. See Hansen is a very Nazi like environmentalist and tried to use science to back up claims. Yet after 40+ tears NO scientific evidence has been put forth.

He was able to get grants, publish several books, do the AGW speaking tour at $150,000 per 30 minutes. And the AGW cult paid it and worshipped him like a god. Many other discovered they could to the same and next thing you know AGW became a cash cow for many "scientists"..

You do know he had to produce creditable results to keep the research grants. Which is based partly on your past record of creditable results (Which is whay the post doctoral is SSSOOOO important for a new Ph.D)

Second, only a few scientist would risk their creditability t scam the public--mainly due to the fact that a life in Academia(with Tenure) is probably the sweetest job a doctor can land(Yes, corporations pay more, but the stressful need to produce makes life miserable for most doctors)

Think about #2 for awhile. This is the point that tends to undermine the scam for cash argument the most!

3rd)Most scientist loves to disprove false theories and ideas! Find the flaw is a quick and fun past time. Proving theories, a lot harder and require some rigorous and critical thinking plus patience in many cases.

If AGW was a boatload of crap, most scientist would have a field day disproving it, like they did with cold fusion! in fact, some scientist would invite a fraudster to present their claims for 2 harsh reasons

a) To display their supreme understanding of a field while laughing at a "Fool". Both forms of the word is used.

b)To warn their student researchers, postdocs and fellow collegues that science is serious business. Your carreer can be destroyed if you make fantastic claims and can't defend yourself.


This tend to suggest that AGW are all false or discredited scientist that has no support from Government agencies or scientif organizations. But they do, which undercuts the argument as well.

In other words, there has to be more than "scientist are making lots of cash" to explain the Hoaxer. There has to be more to it.....

The Emperor has no clothes theory might apply, but that would suggest a lot of scientist are buying into the claims because they are not familiar with the theories of Meteorology. However, that is highly doubtful as well.


OK so the same people that have bought in to AGW i.e. Obama,etc. have DEPENDED on the uninformed to "BELIEVE" academia because well they are "educated"!
But the best example of why people bought into AGW comes from Obama's "Dreams from My Father"...published July 18,1995!
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied. They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time.
"

So consider the FACT it took "tricks" tactics to fool people. I.e. lies.
And yet when you use the "Emperor has no clothes" and look at the "academic" expertise of Obama etc. ...Obama is naked!
Obama and his ilk have depended on the people they are fooling to believe the "consensus". I mean Obama depended on the "stupidity of American Voter" to
pass Obamacare. So it was with AGW. Obama depending on these "fools" that believe the academia is always right to ignore the facts.

First, I agree that 'appealing to authority' is a normal fallacy practiced by people that do not have enough information to make a choice themselves. However, there exist a problem if making a choice is of an emergency nature. So yes, that could be part of the issue.

However, I doubt scientists that have peered reviewed material in their field would get taken in by politeness. That may work with the general public, but what about he scientist, such as meteorologists, that have peer reviewed their collegues work?


Also, you talk about "Facts" , however, most of the challenges to AGW,
are usually met with criticim from the scientifc community. The best anti AGW has to cyclic temperature changes in the past and the possibility that this maybe.

Even the counter argument "temperatures are raising to fast for that t be the case" fails to the realization that we do not know how fast temperature may have rose, nor fully understand how the cycle iscreated.

But hat admits another problem,if global temperature change is not affected by humans, how do we survive if temperatures go outside our sustainable range?

We ave a new problem which is kind of related to the old problem minus human influence!
 
The algores of the world need to find a way to stop all farts...
 
bernie said at a town meeting in morrisvile "you have all the scientists on one side, and rush limbaugh on the other" that's what i mean by cooking the story for political expediency.

when there is a unanimous opinion supported empirically, the scientists will stop arguing about it.

it's a big fat vague political monster revenue generator.

if controlling the weather is the highest priority we have on earth right now, it does explain a bit the way things are the way they are.

Climate Change Consensus Is Virtually Unanimous

when it comes to global warmalists, follow the money. :cool:

bear_3191458b.jpg


taking the earth's temperature is like finding the average phone number in the new york phone book.

climate change is the the new whatever at the ballot box. if the wasn't $$ in it, no one would care.





If a billion people say a false thing, it is still a false thing.

1.3 billion thinks Israel shouldn't exist.
 
Yes, the climate changes. We should all agree on that. But does it spell doom for humanity? No. Climate Change is being used to scare people into supporting a particular political agenda. The usual suspect 'Global Warming' zealots sound more desperate and ridiculous by the day. It seems less & less are buying into their hysterical fear mongering. That's spinning them into panic-mode.

There is absolutely no scientific evidence supporting the belief that warmer climates result in the end of life. In fact, the scientific evidence shows that life thrives in warm climates. It's incredibly diverse and abundant. So, does the climate change? Sure it does. Does it mean 'End-Times?' Of course not. The fear mongering needs to end. We'll survive a warm climate. Time to turn the page on the Global Warming hysteria.
 
Yes, the climate changes. We should all agree on that. But does it spell doom for humanity? No. Climate Change is being used to scare people into supporting a particular political agenda. The usual suspect 'Global Warming' zealots sound more desperate and ridiculous by the day. It seems less & less are buying into their hysterical fear mongering. That's spinning them into panic-mode.

There is absolutely no scientific evidence supporting the belief that warmer climates result in the end of life. In fact, the scientific evidence shows that life thrives in warm climates. It's incredibly diverse and abundant. So, does the climate change? Sure it does. Does it mean 'End-Times?' Of course not. The fear mongering needs to end. We'll survive a warm climate. Time to turn the page on the Global Warming hysteria.


These idiots say if there is any Climate Change it is man caused. AND if "you" pay more fees/fines/taxes "they" can control it.
 
Yes, the climate changes. We should all agree on that. But does it spell doom for humanity? No. Climate Change is being used to scare people into supporting a particular political agenda. The usual suspect 'Global Warming' zealots sound more desperate and ridiculous by the day. It seems less & less are buying into their hysterical fear mongering. That's spinning them into panic-mode.

There is absolutely no scientific evidence supporting the belief that warmer climates result in the end of life. In fact, the scientific evidence shows that life thrives in warm climates. It's incredibly diverse and abundant. So, does the climate change? Sure it does. Does it mean 'End-Times?' Of course not. The fear mongering needs to end. We'll survive a warm climate. Time to turn the page on the Global Warming hysteria.


These idiots say if there is any Climate Change it is man caused. AND if "you" pay more fees/fines/taxes "they" can control it.

Yes, it fits the One World Government folks' agenda. They're scaring the People into supporting their massive World Government takeover. They're convincing them they need a 'Savior.' And they're gonna be that Savior. But the reality is, there will be no 'Global Warming' apocalypse. It's been proven all throughout the history of earth that high CO2 levels and warm climates actually result in animal and plant life thriving.

The 'Global Warming' zealots can't even get their apocalypse story straight. One day it's 'we're all gonna die from an extreme hot & dry climate.' The next day it's 'we're all gonna die from an extreme hot & wet climate.' Some are even pushing 'we're all gonna die from a Global Warming-induced Ice Age.' It's what happens when Politics enters the realm of science. Most people doing the fear mongering have no idea what they're talking about. In the end, it's all abut pushing agendas. Not much real Science involved with the 'Global Warming' scare. And that's the tragedy.
 
Yep, it's still cold here... Still waiting for the "warming".....
 
Yep, it's still cold here... Still waiting for the "warming".....

Life thrives in warm climates. This has been proven all throughout the history of earth. There will be no 'Global Warming' apocalypse. If you do wanna fear a climate boogeyman, 'Global Cooling' could be somewhat of a concern. Animal and plant life don't do well in extreme cold climates. Not much can endure Ice Ages. But i don't fear any climate boogeyman. It's all just about pushing political agendas.
 
Once upon a time the idea that the earth was flat was virtually a unanimous thought.....

Yeah, the Global Warming zealots are behaving like an angry hysterical mob at this point. They should be ashamed of themselves. They're trying to bully people into submission.
 
Once upon a time the idea that the earth was flat was virtually a unanimous thought.....

Yeah, the Global Warming zealots are behaving like an angry hysterical mob at this point. They should be ashamed of themselves. They're trying to bully people into submission.
al gore started the hysteria, and the industrialization of global warmalists.
 
If the plan is to control the weather, could you make it warmer here in Canada? It's too damn cold!

Don't worry, the minute the U.S. Federal Government starts trying to control the weather is the minute the planet bursts into flames, cold problem solved Canada ...and you're welcome. :)
 
If the plan is to control the weather, could you make it warmer here in Canada? It's too damn cold!

Don't worry, the minute the U.S. Federal Government starts trying to control the weather is the minute the planet bursts into flames, cold problem solved Canada ...and you're welcome. :)
What do you mean the U.S. Federal Government starts trying to control the weather? You don't see that the morons up in DC, are trying to change the weather, but as typical of intelligence lower than a box of rocks, they are too stupid to know they cant? They have become so religiously fanatical in their GW belief, that most believers get down right MAD, and froth at the mouth when they cant get US to convert. Problem for them is that every time a dipshit liberal opens their mouth about Global Warming, err I mean Climate Change, err whatever the next crisis will be, God does a smackdown on the libtards, to PROVE them wrong. Weekend Snow to Whiten Portions of Midwest, Northeast as Cold Pours In
Weekend Snow to Whiten Portions of Midwest, Northeast as Cold Pours In
When you ask a libtard "if the Arctic Ocean is warming and the ice will soon be gone, where does this COLD come from? All you get is the Deer in the Headlights look.

untitled.png
 
i believe in climate change, one day many years ago i saw a beautiful calm day full sun, blue sky and 5 hours later a tornado ripped across the countryside, another time a beautiful day it was 97 Deg. the next day it was cold rainy and turned to snow later on. when you see that rapid of climate change, you gotta believe in it. :lmao: ... :lmao:
 
The IPCC flat out admitted that climate change was nothing more than a wealth redistribution scheme
 

Forum List

Back
Top