Class Warfare a Bust:Gallup 75% of voters don't care Romeny's rich

[Charles_Main]

Lincoln said that labor always precedes capital, that take away labor and capital dies while take away capital and labor survives. Tru dat.

But your boy has spent his whole life screwing labor...

And trying not to leave fingerprints on the corpse...

I love how you guys paint things.

You describe Providing the Necessary Capital Infusions Private Companies needed to Grow, Survive, or Start up is tantamount to "Screwing Labor"

You will never understand how it works.

 

[JoeB131]

Not worried about that, because a Dem minority in the Senate will check him on those issues.

It's nice to see you admitting the only thing between your boy and all sorts of crazy disasters is the Democrats.

Hey, what if the Democrats totally ***** out and let them get away with this stuff? What if some of the most outrageous teabagging bills make it to Romney's desk? Then what? You know, the ones that privatize social security and medicare.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Those what ifs won't happen. Almost all of the Dems and more than 50% of the Pubs in the Senate know that 'tea parties are for little girls with imaginary friends.'

Not worried about that, because a Dem minority in the Senate will check him on those issues.

It's nice to see you admitting the only thing between your boy and all sorts of crazy disasters is the Democrats.

Hey, what if the Democrats totally ***** out and let them get away with this stuff? What if some of the most outrageous teabagging bills make it to Romney's desk? Then what? You know, the ones that privatize social security and medicare.

 

[Vel]

Pub dupes- fighting for their right to be absolutely SCREWED by the GREEDY rich, your heroes. Thanks for the cronyism/corruption WORLD depression, and paralyzing gov't since 2/2010- idiots.

Nobody minds the rich, if they're not screwing the country fcs.

Do you realize that if Obama were any kind of leader then this nation wouldn't have a government that was "paralyzed". Obama seemed to have read his own press and thought that he really did have the ability to heal the planet and lower the seas on command. He was elected to lead and instead has stood there whining like a child that people won't play the game his way. Those mean ole Republicans just won't let him do what he wants.

It was Obama's job to go to Washington DC and find a way to bring both parties together for the good of the nation just as other presidents before he have done. He FAILED! He continues to fail because he can't see beyond "I won". It's time for real leadership in DC. Romney will do an excellent job.

 

[Unkotare]

Whoooooooooo hoooooooooo! All that effort to malign Romney for being successful has freaking failed.

Check it out especially the independents. Somewhere tonight Axelrod is crying.


Gallup: Majority Say Romney’s Wealth Won’t Affect Their Vote

Thursday, 12 Jul 2012 09:59 AM

By Newsmax Wires


An overwhelming majority of voters – 75 percent – say that Mitt Romney’s $200 million net worth makes no difference in their choice between him and President Barack Obama, according to a new Gallup poll.

Meanwhile, 20 percent of voters say Romney’s wealth makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.

Breaking it down by party affiliation, among Republicans, 89 percent say Romney’s riches make no difference, 8 percent say they are a reason to vote for him, and 4 percent say they are a reason to vote against him. Among Democrats, 62 percent don’t care about Romney’s wealth, 37 percent say it’s a negative factor, and 1 percent say it’s positive.

The sentiment of independents may be most important, as they are likely to decide the election’s outcome. In this demographic 76 are indifferent to Romney’s wealth, 19 percent say it makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Gallup: Majority Say Romney’s Wealth Won’t Affect Their Vote

The wannabe Marxists won't know what to do with themselves.

 

[JoeB131]

Lincoln said that labor always precedes capital, that take away labor and capital dies while take away capital and labor survives. Tru dat.

But your boy has spent his whole life screwing labor...

And trying not to leave fingerprints on the corpse...

I love how you guys paint things.

You describe Providing the Necessary Capital Infusions Private Companies needed to Grow, Survive, or Start up is tantamount to "Screwing Labor"

You will never understand how it works.

I understand how it works perfectly well.

We have jobs because there are needs for the services or goods we produce. Sometimes they are funded by the government, sometimes by private investment. But there wouldn't be jobs if there was no need for the service.

Romney's attitude is that we can screw the people doing those jobs to give more money to investors... and that's the problem. Because eventually, when the people doing the jobs have less money, they spend less on things, and soon, commerce comes to an end. You lay people off, you move their jobs to China, you get rid of their union salaries and benefits, two things happen.

1) THey become more dependent on government.

2) They spend less on consumer goods and services, reducing the need for other jobs.

In short, Romney and his ilk aren't the solution, they are the cause of our woes.

 

[Unkotare]

Speak of the devil...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Define Marxist.

Define how Marxism is operating in our country.

Or shut up with the absolutely stupid comments.

 

[JoeB131]

Those what ifs won't happen. Almost all of the Dems and more than 50% of the Pubs in the Senate know that 'tea parties are for little girls with imaginary friends.'

Not worried about that, because a Dem minority in the Senate will check him on those issues.

It's nice to see you admitting the only thing between your boy and all sorts of crazy disasters is the Democrats.

Hey, what if the Democrats totally ***** out and let them get away with this stuff? What if some of the most outrageous teabagging bills make it to Romney's desk? Then what? You know, the ones that privatize social security and medicare.

Uh, yeah. That's right.

That's why Orrin Hatch soiled his magic underwear sucking up to them.

That's why Dick Lugar is looking forward to retirement in January.

Because they know that invoking the wrath of the TEA party means you won't win your primary..

 

[JakeStarkey]

'tea parties are for little girls with imaginary friends and for JoeBs with fervent imagination.' The GOP will have far less TPM influence next year than last year. Your exceptions prove my rule.

Those what ifs won't happen. Almost all of the Dems and more than 50% of the Pubs in the Senate know that 'tea parties are for little girls with imaginary friends.'

It's nice to see you admitting the only thing between your boy and all sorts of crazy disasters is the Democrats.

Hey, what if the Democrats totally ***** out and let them get away with this stuff? What if some of the most outrageous teabagging bills make it to Romney's desk? Then what? You know, the ones that privatize social security and medicare.

Uh, yeah. That's right.

That's why Orrin Hatch soiled his magic underwear sucking up to them.

That's why Dick Lugar is looking forward to retirement in January.

Because they know that invoking the wrath of the TEA party means you won't win your primary..

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Define Marxist.

Define how Marxism is operating in our country.

Or shut up with the absolutely stupid comments.

Neo-Marxism, they pick on the weak minded and make them feel clever and superior

 

[rdean]

Take all the worst aspects of human behavior. Greed, bullying, lying, sadism, roll them into one candidate and Republicans say, "We've found our man".

 

[JakeStarkey]

Define how Marxism, Frank, is operating in our country. You just defined the far right.

Define Marxist.

Define how Marxism is operating in our country.

Or shut up with the absolutely stupid comments.

Neo-Marxism, they pick on the weak minded and make they feel clever and superior

 

[Unkotare]

Define Marxist.

If you are in need of basic education that's your ******* problem. I don't teach for free.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Define how Marxism, Frank, is operating in our country. You just defined the far right.

Define Marxist.

Define how Marxism is operating in our country.

Or shut up with the absolutely stupid comments.

Neo-Marxism, they pick on the weak minded and make they feel clever and superior

Jake, you're clever and superior, you tell me

 

[JakeStarkey]

Unkobarf, in other words, is throwing out terms he neither understands nor how they apply to its targets.

But I do know words, and Unkobarf is a demagogue.

Define Marxist.

If you are in need of basic education that's your ******* problem. I don't teach for free.

 

[ScienceRocks]

They(marxist) force people to take only what another man can as that’s what they consider “fair”. The marxist forces everyone to be equal no matter their ability as some people would be rich and some poor within such a society based on ability(how intelligent, how strong, how able). The Marxist wants to tax, so the government can give out the goods to the people as a Marxist society is like Cuba as that is the best way they believe to do such. Not the people controlling their own lives as that would play into nature.

The Marxist fail as it takes from the rich and gives it to the poor. Pretty soon it runs out and everyone is forced to be poor. It doesn't work as it goes against human nature to want to be better and it just doesn't make "more" goods to sustain its self. Capitalism works as it is a cycle of demanders and suppliers that plays into human nature to want to buy a good(product) and to make that good. We need to think of a better system of helping people, but as long as you push Marxism. That will never occur.

One that takes from Capitalism and somehow makes it more fair for the middle and helps the poor to move upwards. Helps as it shouldn't be given to them.

All classes must make to be able to sustain the size of the "pie"(economy).

 

[JakeStarkey]

Matthew, that is a start but a very weak one. Give us a solid documented definition of Marxism and then show us, if possible, that the dems (or the pubs) are running Marxist parties here in America.

They force people to take only what another man can as that’s what they consider “fair”. They force everyone to be equal no matter their ability as some people would be rich and some poor within such a society. The Marxist wants to tax, so the government can give out the goods to the people as a Marxist society is like Cuba. Not the people controlling their own lives.

The Marxist fail as it takes from the rich and gives it to the poor. Pretty soon it runs out and everyone is forced to be poor. It doesn't work as it goes against human nature to want to be better and it just doesn't make "more" goods to sustain its self. Capitalism works as it is a cycle of demanders and suppliers that plays into human nature to want to buy a good(product) and to make that good. We need to think of a better system of helping people, but as long as you push Marxism. That will never occur.

One that takes from Capitalism and somehow makes it more fair for the middle and helps the poor to move upwards. Helps as it shouldn't be given to them.

 

[tinydancer]

Matthew, that is a start but a very weak one. Give us a solid documented definition of Marxism and then show us, if possible, that the dems (or the pubs) are running Marxist parties here in America.

They force people to take only what another man can as that’s what they consider “fair”. They force everyone to be equal no matter their ability as some people would be rich and some poor within such a society. The Marxist wants to tax, so the government can give out the goods to the people as a Marxist society is like Cuba. Not the people controlling their own lives.

The Marxist fail as it takes from the rich and gives it to the poor. Pretty soon it runs out and everyone is forced to be poor. It doesn't work as it goes against human nature to want to be better and it just doesn't make "more" goods to sustain its self. Capitalism works as it is a cycle of demanders and suppliers that plays into human nature to want to buy a good(product) and to make that good. We need to think of a better system of helping people, but as long as you push Marxism. That will never occur.

One that takes from Capitalism and somehow makes it more fair for the middle and helps the poor to move upwards. Helps as it shouldn't be given to them.

Most libs are from the maoist veins these days.

And having come from the dark side I know both of them. Mao and Marx. I used to be a huge lib. 60's kinda really make you peel your shit off lib. True lib.

Be glad to have a conversation with you one day. I know why the left fails. And fails continuously.

It's the god complex of their leaders.

 

[tjvh]

It was never an issue of his "Wealth".

It's an issue of how he got his wealth and how he used it to screw working people.

And when people hear about the sleazy actions of Bane, they generally are less inclined to like Romney.

He looks like the guy who laid off your dad.

Oh I get it now, it was about Romney eliminating jobs for Americans.[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YabnLHPYDW4]80% Of Green Jobs Stimulus Money Going Overseas - YouTube[/ame]