Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
24,080
Reaction score
42,855
Points
2,430

Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?

22 Mar 2026 ~~ By Matt Margolis

I’ve been admittedly skeptical that the current effort to pass the SAVE America Act will succeed. I want it to pass. Desperately. And from where I sit, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t pass. But we all know why something so popular and commonsense can’t get to President Donald Trump’s desk for his signature. Democrats in Congress don’t want election integrity and are fighting against it like their power is on the line.
Despite my skepticism, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), the lead sponsor of the bill, is confident the SAVE America Act is going to pass — and after just six days of debate, Democrats may already be looking for a way out.
As you know, the bill does two things. It requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and a voter ID when casting a ballot. Polls repeatedly show that Americans overwhelmingly support these ideas, regardless of political party or race.
And Sen. Lee knows it, too.
"Americans overwhelmingly believe that voters in the United States, you need to be US citizens," Lee said. "So our bill does two things in order to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat."
The fight right now isn't really about the merits. Let’s be honest about that. It's about the Senate's cloture threshold, the 60-vote supermajority needed to end debate and move to a final vote. Republicans don't have those numbers on their own, which means they need Democrats to break ranks. Lee's strategy is to make them do exactly that, and he's drawing on a historical playbook to get it done.
"We're using a playbook that in a slightly different form was used in 1964 to overcome a cloture gap of thirty-two votes," Lee said, referring to the landmark Civil Rights Act debate. Back then, the Senate debated for sixty days before enough votes materialized to close debate. Today's cloture deficit is far smaller. "We've got only a ten-vote cloture deficit to overcome here," Lee noted. "This is a simpler bill, and it's preferred by eighty-five percent of American voters."
~Snip~
According to Lee, the early signs are apparently promising. After only six days on the floor, he says Democrats are reportedly already hunting for an exit, which tells you something about the political pressure building around this vote.
The only secret to passing the SAVE America Act, Lee says, is time and willpower. Six days in, it looks like the willpower is holding — and the clock is doing the rest of the work.




Commentary:
We keep being told by Democrats that this is Jim Crow 2.0 or 1930s Germany.
Doesn’t matter if it passes and is signed into “law”. The problem is always enforcement. The law will have no teeth, as so many of them do not, except for punitive financial penalties which end up being just “the cost of doing business”. Its provisions will never be observed or enforced in Blue Sanctuary Plantation States, cities or counties where Democrats dominate. Democrats are a law unto themselves, and nobody ever messes with them. The U.S. Congress is no longer a solution. It’s become the problem.
 

Are We On the Verge of a Breakthrough on the SAVE America Act?

22 Mar 2026 ~~ By Matt Margolis

I’ve been admittedly skeptical that the current effort to pass the SAVE America Act will succeed. I want it to pass. Desperately. And from where I sit, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t pass. But we all know why something so popular and commonsense can’t get to President Donald Trump’s desk for his signature. Democrats in Congress don’t want election integrity and are fighting against it like their power is on the line.
Despite my skepticism, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah), the lead sponsor of the bill, is confident the SAVE America Act is going to pass — and after just six days of debate, Democrats may already be looking for a way out.
As you know, the bill does two things. It requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and a voter ID when casting a ballot. Polls repeatedly show that Americans overwhelmingly support these ideas, regardless of political party or race.
And Sen. Lee knows it, too.
"Americans overwhelmingly believe that voters in the United States, you need to be US citizens," Lee said. "So our bill does two things in order to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat."
The fight right now isn't really about the merits. Let’s be honest about that. It's about the Senate's cloture threshold, the 60-vote supermajority needed to end debate and move to a final vote. Republicans don't have those numbers on their own, which means they need Democrats to break ranks. Lee's strategy is to make them do exactly that, and he's drawing on a historical playbook to get it done.
"We're using a playbook that in a slightly different form was used in 1964 to overcome a cloture gap of thirty-two votes," Lee said, referring to the landmark Civil Rights Act debate. Back then, the Senate debated for sixty days before enough votes materialized to close debate. Today's cloture deficit is far smaller. "We've got only a ten-vote cloture deficit to overcome here," Lee noted. "This is a simpler bill, and it's preferred by eighty-five percent of American voters."
~Snip~
According to Lee, the early signs are apparently promising. After only six days on the floor, he says Democrats are reportedly already hunting for an exit, which tells you something about the political pressure building around this vote.
The only secret to passing the SAVE America Act, Lee says, is time and willpower. Six days in, it looks like the willpower is holding — and the clock is doing the rest of the work.




Commentary:
We keep being told by Democrats that this is Jim Crow 2.0 or 1930s Germany.
Doesn’t matter if it passes and is signed into “law”. The problem is always enforcement. The law will have no teeth, as so many of them do not, except for punitive financial penalties which end up being just “the cost of doing business”. Its provisions will never be observed or enforced in Blue Sanctuary Plantation States, cities or counties where Democrats dominate. Democrats are a law unto themselves, and nobody ever messes with them. The U.S. Congress is no longer a solution. It’s become the problem.

majority of USA citizens want it, I thought congress works for us.......right?
there should not be any hold up
we pay their bloated salary.......get it done
we the people.......
 
Last edited:
In the end its irrelevant. The Constitution grants states the right to enact their own rules over elections.
It also gives Congress the ability to override state law.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.
 
It also gives Congress the ability to override state law.
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.

Yes they can over ride state laws but they cant over ride the Constitution.
 
And from where I sit, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t pass.
What problem does it solve since voter fraud in America is virtually non-existent?
 
The fight right now isn't really about the merits. Let’s be honest about that. It's about the Senate's cloture threshold, the 60-vote supermajority needed to end debate and move to a final vote. Republicans don't have those numbers on their own, which means they need Democrats to break ranks.

Or they resort to some way to weaken the filibuster rules to end debate on the bill with 51 votes instead of 60. Maybe a talking filibuster, or they change the rules. Apparently there are enough Repub senators that won't do that, which I believe is more important than the SAVE Act. I'd be fine with passing the SAVE Act if they can do it with some democrat support, but don't screw with the filibuster. That is all that stands in the way of mob rule, the minority party will have no say at all and that is not a good thing. Even if they are disabusing it, which both sides have done and are doing.
 
majority of USA citizens want it, I thought congress works for us.......right?
there should not be any hold up
we pay their bloated salary.......get it done
we the people.......
It's funny to watch dems over the years claiming that the US should be run by marority vote. If the majority of the people favor a particular policy then democrats represent that majority, and, that includes the Constitution itself. If the majority of people want it, then it should become the law of the land

until it runs afoul of their narrative. Then it is Jim Crow 2.0.
 
As you know, the bill does two things. It requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote and a voter ID when casting a ballot. Polls repeatedly show that Americans overwhelmingly support these ideas, regardless of political party or race.
What it doesn't do is solve the problem of voter fraud since there is no problem with voter fraud. So, what is its actual purpose?
 
Unless they change the filibuster rule, NFL.

Like the false claim of election fraud in 2020, the Save Act is based on the same false premise as that Big Lie. If the DOJ can prove a state is subverting their Republican form of government and is disenfranchising it's citizens by diluting their legal votes with illegal ones, then the Feds should be allowed to force a remedy on that state.
 
Unless they change the filibuster rule, NFL.

Like the false claim of election fraud in 2020, the Save Act is based on the same false premise as that Big Lie. If the DOJ can prove a state is subverting their Republican form of government and is disenfranchising it's citizens by diluting their legal votes with illegal ones, then the Feds should be allowed to force a remedy on that state.
<~~~~~~~~~~>
You just keep telling yourself the same mantra.. No one is listening.
 
Yes they can over ride state laws but they cant over ride the Constitution.

Is there something in the SAVE Act that overrides the Constitution? The requirement for an ID as a prerequisite to vote does not infringe on anybody's right to vote. I will say that the gov't at every level oughta be providing free ID cards though.
 
15th post
Is there something in the SAVE Act that overrides the Constitution? The requirement for an ID as a prerequisite to vote does not infringe on anybody's right to vote. I will say that the gov't at every level oughta be providing free ID cards though.


As I have noted many times.....i already have an ID to vote. It was gave to me in 1980 when I registered to vote.

With this new act I would have to jump through additional hoops to exercise my right to vote just as I have since 1980.

No.
 
Who are more likely to have a passport, Democrats or MAGA Trump Rally-goers?

And if they don't, which group is going to be more willing to shell out the $160 to get one?
 
<~~~~~~~~~~>
You just keep telling yourself the same mantra.. No one is listening.
just-so-we-all-understand-v0-9fjb8od45uqg1.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom