Civil War/Partitioning Iraq

Kathianne said:
We've had these discussions before, but I thought this was an interesting 'round-up' of some of the salient points. It's too long to post, but you might want to check it out:

http://vodkapundit.com/archives/006732.php

I think it may end up this way. My guess is that even though its sort of a lame duck war with the elections going on, we,re gonna have to keep our finger on the pulse of the Iraqis and let it play out. We can't forget that they have sovereignty as fragile as that might be.
 
We can't forget that they have sovereignty as fragile as that might be.

the y have just the same sovereingity...the same sovereignity as any other independant country.
A sovereign state should not be attack like Iraq had been attacked.
US didn't repesct this sovereignity.
 
padisha emperor said:
the y have just the same sovereingity...the same sovereignity as any other independant country.
A sovereign state should not be attack like Iraq had been attacked.
US didn't repesct this sovereignity.

DISH--there is a new thread to voice french american threads--use it.

I was saying that the NEW soveriegn Irag ( the one that does not help terrorism) should be respected by the US. If other countries want thier sovereignty respected, then they are wise to not support terrorism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top