Choosing Your Political Party Comes Down To One Word

Every time.....this is the language when they have been pulverized.


Here I am slappin’ you around like a school girl at a Taliban picnic.

And exactly what I predicted......when they can't answer, and embarrassed.....this is the languge one should expect.

LOL!!

Hey, you ignorant bitch, when you can show me where you gave me YOUR answer, then you'll have a point.

I told you, I will happily answer your question when you answer mine (which was posed first).

Either answer or be a complete coward...
 
Translation: I cannot answer the question because it’s easier to change the subject….

Exactly. She pretends to be so intelligent, and then proves to be an unqualified failure at answering a simple question.

Watch: she'll never answer. She'll post links to completely unrelated nonsense, but she'll never answer. She lacks both the intelligence and the quality of character...
 
Exactly. She pretends to be so intelligent, and then proves to be an unqualified failure at answering a simple question.

Watch: she'll never answer. She'll post links to completely unrelated nonsense, but she'll never answer. She lacks both the intelligence and the quality of character...
She doesn't answer, copies and pastes the same material over and over, then finally, runs away and declares a non-existent victory.
Flood the zone with shit and then run away. :)
 
The best you can do???

Did you learn that language at mommy's knee?


Should I be apoligizing for taking advantage of one with your.....limited.....ability?

You're hardly worthy of my best.

You were asked a question, to which you responded by posting irrelevant links.

Then you asked me a question and demanded an answer.

All you've done is proven, repeatedly, that you're either too stupid or too much of a coward to answer the question I asked you.

You answer my question then I'll answer yours. Why is that so problematic for you?

And you're hardly talented enough to take advantage of anything, so there's no need to be "apoligizing" [sic] for anything...
 
You're hardly worthy of my best.

You were asked a question, to which you responded by posting irrelevant links.

Then you asked me a question and demanded an answer.

All you've done is proven, repeatedly, that you're either too stupid or too much of a coward to answer the question I asked you.

You answer my question then I'll answer yours. Why is that so problematic for you?

And you're hardly talented enough to take advantage of anything, so there's no need to be "apoligizing" [sic] for anything...


Yet....here you are again.....still trying to save face....without having any to begin with.


And having been so embarrassed.....you'll be back.
 
How about this?

The main difference between the parties, and their symbols.


1653743000935.png




1653742935665.png
canadiansculpture.jpg





 
canon shooter said:
Are you in favor of allowing "choice" when it comes to rape or incest or when the life of the mother is in jeopardy


If the right would allow those choices would you stop calling for late term abortions and after birth abortion? Canon Shooter
 
Yet....here you are again.....still trying to save face....without having any to begin with.


And having been so embarrassed.....you'll be back.

I'm not embarrassed at all, gash.

You're the one who's been dodging the answering of a single question.

And why is that?

Well, it's because you come out as staunchly pro-life yet, despite your profound cowardice in responding to my question, you WOULD allow for a choice in the instances I mentioned, and that would make you a hypocrite. You know it, I know it... shit, everyone knows it. You might as well just cop to it. Maybe then you won't look completely ignorant and stupid...
 
canon shooter said:
Show me a single instance where I've called for either of those and I'll buy you a house and a brand new car to put in the garage.

Stop making up bullshit...

it's called compromise. Where will you meet me. Oh and...your response was the same for all practical purposes as raskins. LOL
 
Democrats demand the "right" to kill babies.

At recent hearings, Democrat Raskin was attempting to pin down Catherine Foster, asking "is it your aim to ban all abortions, including cases of rape and incest."


She calmly knocks him cold with one question:







Answer the question, you gormless idiot: would you ban abortions with rape or incest exceptions?


From the video: “If we added rape and incest exceptions”

She tried to dodge the question but answered it anyway.
 
Life.

1. For clarity, rather than agreement, a definition of term: central to the political divide is the view of human life.
Which party is for life, and which party demands the "right" to slaughter innocent human beings?
Recent tragedies aside, there were 45,000 gun deaths in 2020. Which side is trying to stop the violence and which believes there are more important things than those lives?
 
The difference between the two sides is clear.

It is impossible to separate Democrats from DEATH>



The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.




None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."



Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.

Choose a. or b.

a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
 
"When the sanctity of life is only contextualized by the value that you or your government get out of it, encouraged and coerced suicide is the natural conclusion of that slippery slope. Death is a convenient way for a government to get rid of its poor who depend on them for all kinds of support."



a)Democrat Tom Daschle, original nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department, and says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them.
Bloomberg Politics - Bloomberg



b) Democrat Governor Dick Lamm once created a firestorm in Colorado (a few years after leaving the Governor’s office) when he said: “the elderly have a duty to die.”



c. Democrats: A key administration figure committed to cost cutting is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy advisor in the Office of Management and Budget and brother of Rahm Emanuel, the president's chief of staff wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their own patient and consider social justice. They should think about whether the money being spent on their patient could be better spent elsewhere.

Defend Your Health

http://spectator.org/articles/41471/downgrading-american-medical-care



d. WSJ: At one point in the town hall, broadcast from the East Room by ABC news, a woman named Jane Sturm told the story of her 105-year-old mother, who, at 100, was told by an arrhythmia specialist that she was too old for a pacemaker. She ended up getting a second option, and the operation, for which Ms. Sturm credits her survival. "Look, the first thing for all of us to understand that is we actually have some -- some choices to make about how we want to deal with our own end-of-life care," [Democrat] Obama replied. After discussing ways "we as a culture and as a society [can start] to make better decisions within our own families and for ourselves," he continued that in general "at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller."
WSJ: Obama's Health Future
Obama: Maybe You're "Better Off" Taking Painkillers And Forgoing Surgery | RealClearPolitics


Democrats and death......carrots and peas.
 
What is particularly interesting.....and hard to fathom for those atheists of the Demorat persuasion, is how on point a three thousand year old tome can be for today's world.....and this thread in particular.


Proverbs 8:35-36


35 For those who find me find life
and receive favor from the Lord.
36 But those who fail to find me harm themselves;
all who hate me love death.”

 
That's the most ignorant thing you've ever said.

Let me ask you: Do you support the right to abortion in cases of incest or rape, or when the life of the mother is in jeopardy?
Your sick LIE is to equate "incest or rape, or when the life of the mother is in jeopardy" with every single abortion, 99% of which are done out of selfish convenience, and you know it. You are evil.
 
Your sick LIE is to equate "incest or rape, or when the life of the mother is in jeopardy" with every single abortion, 99% of which are done out of selfish convenience, and you know it. You are sick.
Key word being "or".
And to be honest, it's none of your business why a woman chooses to have an abortion.
 
I'm not embarrassed at all, gash.

You're the one who's been dodging the answering of a single question.

And why is that?

Well, it's because you come out as staunchly pro-life yet, despite your profound cowardice in responding to my question, you WOULD allow for a choice in the instances I mentioned, and that would make you a hypocrite. You know it, I know it... shit, everyone knows it. You might as well just cop to it. Maybe then you won't look completely ignorant and stupid...
Fake Fetus-Fetish

That's proof that the power-hungry Puritans don't really believe that the fetus is a baby. Also, that they don't demand funeral services for miscarriages and won't baptize a pregnant woman's belly, keeping it in Original Sin.

Repetition of the chant, "It's a baby. It's a baby. It's a baby!" makes the Christofascists feel powerful, with God on their side. It gives a higher fervor to whatever else they don't like about Democrats. It would heighten their hatred for Libertarians, too, if it weren't for the fact that they have no hatred for Libertarians and won't scream at them for the same manufactured reason they scream at Democrats.
 

Forum List

Back
Top