Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,542
- 8,637
- 2,138
Oh, are you actually prepared to engage with critiques, rather than just copy/paste old messages to drown me out?
Mental Illness Has Always Been On Display...On One Side
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
Holy shit. A genuine duckarooney.
You search the internet looking for politically motivated blogs that post “studies” of dubious quality to act as echo chambers, telling you what you want to hear.
That’s what you do.
Your boozed up state is talking for you.
Holy shit, another who actually attacked his own type and pretends he never noticed him doing it.
Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,542
- 8,637
- 2,138
I told the damn truth and you know it.
I have been well acquainted with the woman you keep attacking. She makes claims and proves them. It is a reflection on her Ivy league university training. You are more than likely a nice person in real life but picked a fight with the wrong female.
Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,542
- 8,637
- 2,138
I'm not stupid enough to flaunt my credentials. Lol
Credentials don't matter. The quality of your thoughts is what matters.
Just out of curiosity, and maybe I did, but how exactly would you describe my repeated "attacks" on this person? Can you be specific?
IM2
Diamond Member
- Mar 11, 2015
- 113,093
- 141,791
- 3,645
And here we see a prime example of mental illness that dominates one side, the right.
Published
Mar 28, 2023 at 11:28 AM EDT
updated Sep 12, 2025 at 01:50 AM EDT
In total, there have been 2,861 mass shootings in the U.S. since 2018.
On its website, Everytown Research & Policy cites 306 mass shootings in the U.S. since 2009.
"4 shooters out of over 300 mass shooters since 2009 are transgender or non binary. That's just 1.3 percent of all shooters," Anthony Zenkus, a lecturer in social work at Columbia University, wrote on Twitter. "You just proved our point: 99 percent of mass shooters in the United States are cis gendered."
www.newsweek.com
How Many Mass Shootings Have Been Carried Out by Transgender People?
Published
Mar 28, 2023 at 11:28 AM EDT
updated Sep 12, 2025 at 01:50 AM EDT
In total, there have been 2,861 mass shootings in the U.S. since 2018.
On its website, Everytown Research & Policy cites 306 mass shootings in the U.S. since 2009.
"4 shooters out of over 300 mass shooters since 2009 are transgender or non binary. That's just 1.3 percent of all shooters," Anthony Zenkus, a lecturer in social work at Columbia University, wrote on Twitter. "You just proved our point: 99 percent of mass shooters in the United States are cis gendered."
How many mass shootings have been carried out by transgender people?
At least four mass shootings since 2018 have been carried out by perpetrators who do not identify with their birth gender, sparking an online debate.
www.newsweek.com
Leo123
Diamond Member
- Aug 26, 2017
- 38,701
- 31,804
- 2,915
Feminists and so called 'civil rights' proponents let him out. He has deceived women into their misandry and has deceived blacks who think there is such a thing as 'white supremacy.' Democrats have fallen hard for the satanic dogma.
This type of reply denotes insecurity in one's own beliefs.
Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,542
- 8,637
- 2,138
and you expect us to find your research sources credible when you say stuff like that?
- Thread starter
- #54
But where are the errors in the OP to which you couldn't help joining?
- Thread starter
- #55
But where are the errors in the OP to which you couldn't help joining?
- Thread starter
- #56
Two questions that will explain who you are vis-a-vis the OPAnd here we see a prime example of mental illness that dominates one side, the right.
How Many Mass Shootings Have Been Carried Out by Transgender People?
Published
Mar 28, 2023 at 11:28 AM EDT
updated Sep 12, 2025 at 01:50 AM EDT
In total, there have been 2,861 mass shootings in the U.S. since 2018.
On its website, Everytown Research & Policy cites 306 mass shootings in the U.S. since 2009.
"4 shooters out of over 300 mass shooters since 2009 are transgender or non binary. That's just 1.3 percent of all shooters," Anthony Zenkus, a lecturer in social work at Columbia University, wrote on Twitter. "You just proved our point: 99 percent of mass shooters in the United States are cis gendered."
How many mass shootings have been carried out by transgender people?
At least four mass shootings since 2018 have been carried out by perpetrators who do not identify with their birth gender, sparking an online debate.
1. Do you vote Democrat?
2. Do you believe in the sanctity of human life?
- Thread starter
- #57
So you hate religion?
Yet America was founded by folks who believe.
"you expect ...us"
While the liberal mob engages in the kind of violence that one expects of a mob, there is also a species of intellectual mob that relies on praise and ridicule to enforce its views: they rely on the axiom that large segments of the population would rather be punched in the face than be sneered at by the elites. We call them liberals.
The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.
In fact, an easy way to identify a conservative, is to look for the folks who aren’t afraid to be sneered at by “The Daily Show” and the other temples of the status-anxious. Conservatives are not susceptible to groupthink. Jon Stewart transmits the party line to idiots so they know who to hate. The act of applauding a joke rather than laughing at it is a public gesture that serves no purpose other than assuring everyone that you are part of the group. See chapter 14 of "Demonic," by Coulter.
People desperate for a badge of identity are highly susceptible to groupthink, in fierce need of a ‘guide,’ and, so, the “foolish, ignorant, and envious persons are freed from the sense of their insignificance and powerlessness.” Le Bon, “The Crowd: A Study of The Popular Mind,” p.22.
Last edited:
Talking about “scientific studies” that “prove” one side of the political spectrum is crazy out of one side of your mouth and spouting religious fanaticism out of the other side doesn’t inspire confidence
- Thread starter
- #59
Science has, largely, come to believe the Bible.
In fact, science has come more in line with the Bible. Dennis Prager writes:
“In my lifetime alone, science went from positing a universe that always existed to positing a universe that had a beginning (the Big Bang). So, in jut one generation [the Bible], in describing a beginning to the universe, went from conflicting with science to agreeing with science….[The Bible] should not violate essential truths (for example, it accurately depicts human beings as the last creation).”
.
. And even more astounding:
Scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.
Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.
Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
scientist, Palmer, wrote a book about the astounding accuracy of the Bible, 3 thousand years ago, stating the order of the evolution of life on or planet….exactly the presentation that science now accepts as the fact.
Dr. Andrew Palmer, Oxford biologist, whose book, "The Genesis Enigma," states that the writer of the book of Genesis provides an uncannily similar synopsis of the events in the creation as compared to that accepted by modern science today.
Rather than ridicule the Bible, those very same secular, atheistic scientists have come around to accept the very order that the Old Testament claimed was the course of creation:
The idea of the miraculous confluence of the first chapter of Genesis and the sequence advanced by modern science is as follows:
a. The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.
b. From a water covered planet, to terrestrial life. The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.
c. If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, …then the seas appeared on earth, …and that life forms were photosynthetic.
d. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today.
e. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
The above largely from chapter nine of zoologist Andrew Parker’s “The Genesis Enigma.”
Wow! What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!
Or…an alternative explanation: divine intervention.
Not sure what that hot mess you posted is supposed to answer. Do you even read your posts?John Wilkes Booth was opposed to President Lincoln’s Republican war policies. His letter to is family explained he was furious with Lincoln for having brought war to the South! THE MURDERER OF MR. LINCOLN.; Extraordinary Letter of John Wilkes Booth Proof that He Meditated His Crime Months Ago His Excuses for the Contemplated Act His Participation in the Execution of John Brown. Commissioners of Public Charities and Correction. Fires. The Seventh Ward Fire Note from Chief Engineer Decker. (Published 1865)
Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, “…an angry Copperhead, a.k.a., ‘peace democrat,’ (when that meant pro-slavery, of course.) John Wilkes Booth - Liberapedia
Clement Vallandigham
Alexander Long1860 1868 Anti-abolitionism
Anti-Civil War
JacksonianismDemocratic Party
[th]
Copperhead Democrats
[/th]
[td]
[/td][th]
Historical leaders
[/th]
[th]
Founded
[/th]
[th]
Dissolved
[/th]
[th]
Ideology
[/th]
[th]
National affiliation
[/th]
.png)
John Wilkes Booth assassinated President Abraham Lincoln on April 14, 1865, at Ford's Theatre. As a fervent Confederate sympathizer and white supremacist, Booth despised Lincoln's policies, particularly regarding the abolition of slavery and the extension of voting rights to Black people.
- Motivations: Booth was not primarily a "Copperhead" (a Northern anti-war Democrat) but rather a committed Confederate nationalist. He aimed to avenge the South's defeat and reignite the war by murdering Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, and Secretary of State William Seward.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
How many of you post here mostly just to be social?- Started by Anomalism
- Replies: 13
-
Trump says 'if anything' he forced Israel's hand on Iran attack timing, says Iran was going to strike US first- Started by Pastelli
- Replies: 3
-
