China stunned by the ineffectiveness of their air defense batteries in Maduro Raid

I wanted to touch on this a bit more, for those that do not actually know.

"Vietnam" as it is known today really is a recent entity. For hundreds of years it was not a "nation", it was multiple entities that is not unlike "Germany" before it was unified, or "England" or "China". It was multiple warlords over hundreds of years that controlled various chunks of the modern nation, and all of them allowed to exist because it served the purposes of China who effectively commanded lordship over all of them.

Most specifically by the 16th Century these were the Nguyen Warlords, forerunner of the Nguyen Dynasty who controlled what was essentially Central Vietnam. The far north of the country was controlled by the Trinh Warlords, and the extreme south was controlled by the Champa Warlords.

The 16th Century was when things started to change. The Ming Dynasty was in decline, and their hold on the outer reaches of their empire was falling. The area we now know as Vietnam (then known as Dang Trong and Dang Ngoai) in the 16th century essentially broke away from China, and set up competing feudal kingdoms.

vietnam_1760.jpg


Above is an 18th century French map which clearly shows the divided and separate kingdoms.

In the 17th century, the Nguyen who had been subjugated by the Trinh decided to break away, and that started a war that lasted until the 18th century when the Nguyen were finally victorious and conquered the Trinh and absorbed them into their kingdom. But the Champa in the south remained independent and were still fighting the Nguyen Dynasty when in 1885 the French stepped in and unified the waring kingdoms into a single colony.

So indeed, the separation of North and South was very real. It existed long before the French took over, and even long predates the Nguyen Dynasty. Like most dynasties in that region from the Ming to the entirety of the Japanese Dynasty, they were simply warlords who were able to conquer most of their neighbors and absorb them. In Viet Nam, the Nguyen were actually not in charge for very long, and they did not control all of Vietnam.
  • Chinese Rule: Over a millennium of Chinese domination ended by Ngo Quyen in 938 AD.
  • Chinese Rule was partially reinstated during the Yuan Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty being their overlord.
  • Dynasties: The Ly (1009-1225) and Le (1428-1788) dynasties saw cultural flourishing and expansion, while the Nguyen Dynasty (1802-1945) unified the country but faced colonial pressure.

French Colonialism & Independence Struggle (1858-1945)

  • 1858-1887: France began conquering Vietnam, eventually forming French Indochina (including Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia).
  • 1930: Ho Chi Minh formed the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP).
  • 1941: The Viet Minh guerrilla force was created to fight Japanese invaders during WWII.
  • 1945: Japan defeated; Ho Chi Minh declared independent Democratic Republic of Vietnam; France reasserted control, sparking the First Indochina War.

The Vietnam War (1954-1975)

  • 1954: French defeated at Dien Bien Phu; Geneva Accords divided Vietnam at the 17th parallel into North (communist) and South (US-backed).
  • 1955: Second Indochina War (Vietnam War) began. (a coalition of South Vietnamese resistance groups - with the VC being backed by Communist allies.
  • 1965: First U.S. combat troops landed in Da Nang.

As for Champa

Champa was better considered to be a federation of independent states. A number of modern scholars have suggested that Champa did form a unified kingdom in some periods but was disunited in others.

factually they are a total mix of Cambodian (Khmer Hindu, Mon, Malay, Javanese, Sasak, and Laotian and Vietnamese tribal groups.
First they got suppressed and conquered by the Dai-Viet and in 1832, the Vietnamese emperor Minh Mang annexed the remaining Cham territories. So Vietnam was united into a single country 40 years before the French started to take the place appart. Hence the initial Vietnamese anti-Japan liberators called themselves Viet-Minh.

The name „Hồ Chí Minh“ was a covername he used, to inspire a Single Vietnam Nation - his real name was Nguyễn Sinh Cung

FYI - Germany (Holy Roman Empire of German Nations aka HRE) or 1st German Reich, had already existed with it's own Emperor from (962–1806)
It was Napoleon who dissolved the HRE in 1806, and Prussia upon defeating France in 1871 - called out the 2nd German Reich, This being the reason why the nutty Austrian called his reign the 3rd Reich.

FYI - The traditional Vietnamese Dress for Females is the áo Nhật Bình.,

Nguyá»…n.webp


The áo dài you present was invented&designed during the French Colonial epoche in the 1920's/30's.
 
Last edited:
Well, no, not really. The French did not administer Vietnam as seperate countries, and the Nguyen Dynasty didn't, either. South Vietnam was an artificial creation of the French to keep their foot in the door.

it was no more a country than "East Germany".

South Vietnam only existed as a temporary entity until a national referendum could be held in 1956. Diem cancelled that referendum because he knew that the Communists would win. Easily.

Instead, he rigged an election to depose Bao Dai



Um, yes, we did.

View attachment 1209409








The Veterans Administration disagrees with you.





That was before they could get a full accounting after the war. It works that way in every war, guy, you never get a full accounting of dead civilians until it is over.


The only bad decision was going in to start with.
Wrong it was miongh who cancelled it .

The VA is not a valid source and they have no empirical evidence for most of their claims. Like any government agency they are interested in their own budget which means getting as many patients as humanely possible.

Their accounting wass more accurate during the ar as afterwards it is exaggerated and increased every decade to suit the stupid ideologies of people like yourself. In the 80s it was 1 million in the 90s it was 2 million and today it is 3 million. It keeps increasing not because of better accounting but because of senseless people like you who need it to go up to support a specific anti american agenda.

IF you could read your own ******* sources you might realize how dumb you are. You keep proving me correct. The source you posted is measuring tonnage not number of bombs which is 2 distinctively different measurements. We did not drop more bombs in vietnam as you keep stupidly claiming we dropped more collective WEIGHT in bombs over a 10 year period as opposed to less than 4 years of WWII. This is because of the length of the war and due to the increase in average bomb weight which is in turn due to the use of jet powered aircraft. The average bomb we used in WWII was 500 lbs. In Vientam it went up to 1000 lbs on average. We also did not carpet bomb as we did in WWII. Hanoi for example still stands and was never destroyed as we did with cities in WWII. Hanoi stood as a functioning city throughout the entire war and was never reduced to ash like Dresden or Cologne.

You are a massive failure at history
 
Wrong it was miongh who cancelled it .
Nope, it was Diem.
Then he was overthrown by a Coup.
Then a Junta of unelected Generals took over.
All of whom lived large on money they stole from us... at least for a while.

The VA is not a valid source and they have no empirical evidence for most of their claims. Like any government agency they are interested in their own budget which means getting as many patients as humanely possible.

The organization that runs Veteran Health Care isn't a valid source? Really?


Their accounting wass more accurate during the ar as afterwards it is exaggerated and increased every decade to suit the stupid ideologies of people like yourself. In the 80s it was 1 million in the 90s it was 2 million and today it is 3 million. It keeps increasing not because of better accounting but because of senseless people like you who need it to go up to support a specific anti american agenda.



R. J. Rummel's mid-range estimate in 1997 was that the total deaths due to the Vietnam War totaled 2,450,000 from 1954 to 1975. Rummel calculated PAVN/VC deaths at 1,062,000 and ARVN and allied war deaths of 741,000, with both totals including civilians inadvertently killed. He estimated that victims of democide (deliberate killing of civilians) included 214,000 by North Vietnam/VC and 98,000 by South Vietnam and its allies. Deaths in Cambodia and Laos were estimated at 273,000 and 62,000 respectively.


IF you could read your own ******* sources you might realize how dumb you are. You keep proving me correct. The source you posted is measuring tonnage not number of bombs which is 2 distinctively different measurements.

Distinction without a difference.
 
Nope, it was Diem.
Then he was overthrown by a Coup.
Then a Junta of unelected Generals took over.
All of whom lived large on money they stole from us... at least for a while.



The organization that runs Veteran Health Care isn't a valid source? Really?






R. J. Rummel's mid-range estimate in 1997 was that the total deaths due to the Vietnam War totaled 2,450,000 from 1954 to 1975. Rummel calculated PAVN/VC deaths at 1,062,000 and ARVN and allied war deaths of 741,000, with both totals including civilians inadvertently killed. He estimated that victims of democide (deliberate killing of civilians) included 214,000 by North Vietnam/VC and 98,000 by South Vietnam and its allies. Deaths in Cambodia and Laos were estimated at 273,000 and 62,000 respectively.




Distinction without a difference.
Wrong it was Minh who cancelled elections and siezed power.

Yes it is not a valid source.

Rummel made blind guesses not estimates

It is a massive distinction and difference you dumb ************ proving just how ignorant you are
 
Oh I'm quite sure there was some inside help...
I'm just transferring information I read in military journals.... Why so distressed?
There is no room for anything positive to come out of any decision made by the current adminn
 
Wrong it was Minh who cancelled elections and siezed power.

Yes it is not a valid source.

Rummel made blind guesses not estimates

It is a massive distinction and difference you dumb ************ proving just how ignorant you are
someone should have told you at an early age that contradiction is not an argument.
 
Just read this morning where the Chinese are dumbfounded by the total no show of some of their elite air defense equipment in Venezuela the other day.

So much so that they are now rethinking the Taiwan position

Jo
Here's your link -

 
Here's your link -


It wasn't effective because it wasn't turned on.

The untold story of this raid is going to be how Maduro's own people sold him out. Probably because they didn't want the drama anymore.
 
The North Vietnamese air defences worked they downed thousands of US aircraft.
Iran and Venezuela with the most modern Russian defuses couldt bring down 1 plane. When we invaded Iraq same thing. Russia cant gain air superiority in Ukraine. See a pattern Communist tech is crap
 
Iran and Venezuela with the most modern Russian defuses couldt bring down 1 plane. When we invaded Iraq same thing. Russia cant gain air superiority in Ukraine. See a pattern Communist tech is crap

Wow. Just ******* wow.

First and foremost, Iran had it's air defenses degraded by years of sanctions and Israeli attacks. So no surprise, when Trump did his Reality TV Raid, they didn't get any shots in.

Venezuela, - again, we are going to find out in a few years that the CIA cut a deal with Rodriguez to take out Maduro so she could start selling oil again.

As for Iraq, Iraq never recovered from the first war, and it had been under sanctions for over a decade, receiving no new equipment or replacement parts. And they still sent us retreating from the country with our tails between our legs, using homemade bombs.

As for Ukraine, Russia has seized 20% of the country despite the hundreds of billions of overpriced weapons the West has been dumping into the country. Maybe we should be asking about why Capitalist Tech is crap.
 
Wow. Just ******* wow.

First and foremost, Iran had it's air defenses degraded by years of sanctions and Israeli attacks. So no surprise, when Trump did his Reality TV Raid, they didn't get any shots in.

Venezuela, - again, we are going to find out in a few years that the CIA cut a deal with Rodriguez to take out Maduro so she could start selling oil again.

As for Iraq, Iraq never recovered from the first war, and it had been under sanctions for over a decade, receiving no new equipment or replacement parts. And they still sent us retreating from the country with our tails between our legs, using homemade bombs.

As for Ukraine, Russia has seized 20% of the country despite the hundreds of billions of overpriced weapons the West has been dumping into the country. Maybe we should be asking about why Capitalist Tech is crap.
They all had Russian SS 400 systems and were worthless
 
It wasn't effective because it wasn't turned on.

The untold story of this raid is going to be how Maduro's own people sold him out. Probably because they didn't want the drama anymore.
Link?
 
Iran and Venezuela with the most modern Russian defuses couldt bring down 1 plane. When we invaded Iraq same thing. Russia cant gain air superiority in Ukraine. See a pattern Communist tech is crap

Be careful; you're gonna get JoeBlow in trouble.
 
Wow. Just ******* wow.

First and foremost, Iran had it's air defenses degraded by years of sanctions and Israeli attacks. So no surprise, when Trump did his Reality TV Raid, they didn't get any shots in.

Venezuela, - again, we are going to find out in a few years that the CIA cut a deal with Rodriguez to take out Maduro so she could start selling oil again.

As for Iraq, Iraq never recovered from the first war, and it had been under sanctions for over a decade, receiving no new equipment or replacement parts. And they still sent us retreating from the country with our tails between our legs, using homemade bombs.

As for Ukraine, Russia has seized 20% of the country despite the hundreds of billions of overpriced weapons the West has been dumping into the country. Maybe we should be asking about why Capitalist Tech is crap.

Haven't gotten your breakfast yet?
 
15th post
They all had Russian SS 400 systems and were worthless

I would not say worthless. They are probably plenty good at bringing down older Warsaw Pact era crap.

But they have been proven to be pretty bad at bringing down more modern US aircraft.
 
Iron Dome is very effective. Any defense can be overwhelmed by insane numbers of attacking forces.

Or they simply decide the target is not worth trying to intercept.

That is something seen in almost any air defense operation. You can even see it last year when Iran launched 14 ballistic missiles at Qatar. The US intercepted and destroyed 13 of them. But the last one, no intercept was attempted because they already knew it was only going to impact in the empty desert so there was no point in firing at it.

The RADAR system of modern air defense systems can actually tell the operators things like that. If it's a ballistic missile they can tell where it is going to impact, and if there is nothing there they just let that happens.

I have been laughing at people that look at "failures" for decades in places like Iraq, Qatar and Israel and just shaking my head. No system is ever going to be 100%, but a lot of the footage shown of missiles missed and hitting fields or near roadways were actually not "misses". The operators elected to save their missiles and not intercept in the first place because they knew it was not going to hit anything of importance.
 
Back
Top Bottom