China makes Trump blink, again!

[edthecynic]

The SLAVE states wanted that, but you knew that already.

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

well then you need to get rid of senators and representatives that the electoral college is based off of.

No, get rid of the anti one man one vote Electoral College.

 

[The Original Tree]

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

well then you need to get rid of senators and representatives that the electoral college is based off of.

No, get rid of the anti one man one vote Electoral College.

We'd have to get rid of you then, since you oppose securing The Integrity of One Man, One Vote, One State, One Vote. You also oppose a Bi-Cameral Legislature composed of The Senate and House of Representatives.

 

[OldLady]

The founders wanted that.

The SLAVE states wanted that, but you knew that already.

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

 

[jc456]

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

well then you need to get rid of senators and representatives that the electoral college is based off of.

No, get rid of the anti one man one vote Electoral College.

well son, that's how it was set up. screaming at me doesn't change that fact. if you really want to have a discussion understand the civics behind it. cause all you sound like is a blathering loser.

 

[jc456]

The SLAVE states wanted that, but you knew that already.

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

can't make this shit up!!! Not at all.

 

[The Original Tree]

The SLAVE states wanted that, but you knew that already.

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

 

[jc456]

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

 

[jc456]

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

they need to do this:

learn the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.

 

[The Original Tree]

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Ok, you can answer for her!

 

[mudwhistle]

The founders wanted that.

The SLAVE states wanted that, but you knew that already.

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

The Electoral College not only ensures One Man One Vote, it Ensures States have an Equal Say in a National Election.

1 State 1 Vote.

So now, are you going to Tout THE VIRTUES OF VOTER ID ?

Why do you oppose One Man One Vote?

Only Voter ID Laws can Guarantee that.

They exist in every Democracy on Earth except for ours.

Why are you opposed to protecting the integrity of The Vote?

Nebraska has 1 electoral vote for every 380k people.

New Jersey has 1 for every 635k. Is that remotely fair?

Yes......because of the number of non-citizens in the state.

 

[jc456]

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Ok, you can answer for her!

 

[mudwhistle]

I still have issues with folks that cheer the demise of America every chance they get.

As he cheers for Putin to hack the voting booths in 2020.

You showed your true colors long ago, traitor.

Yeah.....fuck.you.
Trump is no friend of Russia.
And I'll compare my patriotism to yours any fucking day of the week, dirt bag

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

Of course he is

Not at all. If I were to find myself in a room with Trump, I would stand and turn my back to him. I am sure that some clown in a MAGA hat would threaten me, and Trump would say, "Get him outa here!", and then offer to pay their legal expenses if the rough me up, and then they would drag me out. But I simply do not recognize the orange reality star as my president.

Nobody really gives a shit

 

[OldLady]

Again Propaganda.

The Electoral College was designed to balance power between Urban Populations and Rural Populations. That was it's sole purpose, so that New States would not be bullied by Older more Populated States.

This is also the reason we have A Senate and a House of Representatives.

Not only is The Left Ignorant of History, but they are poor liars.

Speaking of Slaves, what is your party doing to stop The Human Trafficking Crisis that occurs across our Southern Border? Or are you all still too dependent on Brown Latino Slaves to work on your Democrat Plantations and Sweat Shops to cut you off from your 250 year addiction to Slave Labor?

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Where is the "equal" part? I have heard people say that without the E.C., heavily populated states like New York and California would dominate. But since heavily populated states ALREADY have a butt load more votes than a state like Nevada or Maine, how is that really any different?
Does New York and California always win the Presidential election? Of course not. So explain how going to the popular vote would actually change anything.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

....because you’re not American.

I don't recognize Trump as my president BECAUSE I am an American who loves his country.

 

[Harry Dresden]

It sickening the number of American posters here that are rooting for China to win and our President to lose. ...

thats the sad state of politics today.....and its because of those 2 useless parties and their tit for tat bullshit...party politics over the counties welfare.........

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anti-American scumbags can't contain their excitement over the notion that our president might fail to secure better trade deals for our nation.

..."our president"? Not my president, pal.

You're part of this nation, right pal?

Sorry, but my country has always been great, until now.

 

[jc456]

The electoral college doesn't balance anything, in fact it unbalances the principal of one person one vote.

no it doesn't, you're still confused lad, go get your sherbet and let the adults discuss adult topics.

If we divide the total U.S. population (about 319 million) by 538 electoral college votes, each electoral college vote should equal about 593K people.

So if we take our nation’s most populated state—California—and divide its 39.1 million population by 593K, the state should get sixty-six electoral college votes. Under the Electoral College system, however, the state only gets fifty-five electoral college votes.

That’s a difference of eleven electoral college votes.

Meanwhile, if we look at one of our nation’s least populated states—North Dakota—and divide its 757K population by 593K, the state should get about one electoral vote. However, under the Electoral College system, it gets three votes.

That means in North Dakota a voter has three times more say in who gets to become President. And it means that a California voter has a vote that is worth only about 83 percent as the rest of the country.

I've never understood the argument that the EC gives each state an equal voice. If each state got the same number of votes, I could see that. But when Maine gets 4 and California gets 55, I don't see how that "levels" things out.

The EC vote is based on both Population and Equal Representation of The States since we are a Republic of States, or Union of States.

Or do you not understand how the number of EC votes are assigned to a state?

Where is the "equal" part? I have heard people say that without the E.C., heavily populated states like New York and California would dominate. But since heavily populated states ALREADY have a butt load more votes than a state like Nevada or Maine, how is that really any different?
Does New York and California always win the Presidential election? Of course not. So explain how going to the popular vote would actually change anything.

see how the EC works? the highly populated states don't win.always. so it works. that was the intention. you answered your own question. nice.