Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If he made an illegal appointment in the first place.

I don't see the "if", in the letter of the law regarding it. And this isn't the first such ruling, in trump's second term.

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 1187438

Wrong. As the decision says, they at worst failed to adhere to proper procedure.

Easily corrected. But not a breaking of the law.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Easily corrected.

heh heh

No

If it were "so easily corrected", they would not have had to make the illegal appointment in the first place.

Who is going to refile this case?

 

[candycorn]

Wrong. As the decision says, they at worst failed to adhere to proper procedure.

Easily corrected. But not a breaking of the law.

You're lying as per usual:

 

[candycorn]

She was renting her other primary house to her niece while claiming, the house she was getting another mortgage on was going to be her primary house. So by your argument on here, makes Trump innocent. Research your battles, before you start them. Dumbass. Lying to get a better interest rate! Lol, or lying period to get a loan.

loser said what?

Just tap out man...you lost.

 

[BackAgain]

I don't see the "if", in the letter of the law regarding it. And this isn't the first such ruling, in trump's second term.

It doesn’t matter what you “see.” Did you familiarize with the government’s alternative position?

heh heh

No

If it were "so easily corrected", they would not have had to make the illegal appointment in the first place.

Who is going to refile this case?

it wasn’t an illegal appointment. It was (again, at worst) a mere procedural error.

And it can still be easily corrected for a couple of reasons including, but not limited to the AG’s subsequent ratifications of the indictments — which included naming the prosecutor as a special prosecutor.

Assuming that all fall flag (which is surely a possibility, I concede), all that needs to be done is to appoint a prosecutor who will be given Senate confirmation. After all, the government has leave to represent.

 

[BackAgain]

You're lying as per usual:

View attachment 1187440

No shitbag. It was an improper appointment at worst. To label it “illegal” is simply false. Which is why you latch on to the misuse of that term.

You’re an asshole, as always.

 

[candycorn]

No shitbag. It was an improper appointment at worst. To label it “illegal” is simply false. Which is why you latch on to the misuse of that term.

You’re an asshole, as always.

Illegal means to "violate the law". Trump was convicted of doing it 34X.

But back to this fiasco with Comey.

Here is the Judge's Ruling:

Your blob and Blondi violated the law.

That is fact.

I know...I know...you will now argue that you know more than a federal judge. What are you basing that on? Your hatred and little else.

Run along junior and take your sock puppets with you.

 

[BackAgain]

Illegal means to "violate the law". Trump was convicted of doing it 34X.

But back to this fiasco with Comey.

Here is the Judge's Ruling:

View attachment 1187444

Your blob and Blondi violated the law.

That is fact.

I know...I know...you will now argue that you know more than a federal judge. What are you basing that on? Your hatred and little else.

Run along junior and take your sock puppets with you.

A violation of the appointments clause is invalid. But assuming that the judge was right on the law, it still doesn’t call the appointment “illegal,” you rat faced turd.

Go **** yourself and all of your socks.

As for me, I have never had a sock. You’re projecting again.

 

[Care4all]

You cannot claim two primary residences. It's against the law, like I said my second property cost me 4 times more than in taxes than it does now. So she also committed tax fraud also.

She did not avoid taxes or falsely claim two homes as her primary home and is not charged with that either, silly one....sheesh!

She had 1 primary home for tax purposes, and paid her taxes properly....there are no charges for anything illegal on that....

She is charged with getting a better mortgage rate....that saved her only +/- $600 a year, over the 30 year life of the mortgage....if she did lie on her mortgage app, (which she didn't.). Charges are never brought on anyone under her circumstances again from what I have read, therefore it is among other things, an illegal vindictive or selective prosecution.

And her niece that lived in her second home, doesn't pay her aunt rent....which her niece testified under oath in a previous grand jury brought in that failed to indict.....

 

[Care4all]

A violation of the appointments clause is invalid. But assuming that the judge was right on the law, it still doesn’t call the appointment “illegal,” you rat faced turd.

Go **** yourself and all of your socks.

As for me, I have never had a sock. You’re projecting again.

What would it be called? A violation of the law instead of just illegal?

 

[BackAgain]

What would it be called? A violation of the law instead of just illegal?

It would be called an invalid appointment.

You’re generally too forthright (your disingenuous use of the emoticon notwithstanding) to pretend that a violation of a procedural rule is “illegal.” We both know that illegal is used to imply “criminal.”

 

[Marener]

It would be called an invalid appointment.

You’re generally too forthright (your disingenuous use of the emoticon notwithstanding) to pretend that a violation of a procedural rule is “illegal.” We both know that illegal is used to imply “criminal.”

You didn’t have any problem calling it an illegal appointment when it was during the Biden administration.

Hack.

 

[schmidlap]

Federal judge dismisses indictments against Letitia James and James Comey, saying Lindsey Halligan appointment was unlawful | CNN Politics

lite.cnn.com

Let me guess. A Democrat judge put his thumb on the scales of justice.

 

[BS Filter]

How do you figure? Trump played his illegal trick once, he can't play it again.

Different prosecutor or it's approved on appeal. Didn't you read the story?

 

[candycorn]

Has anyone explained to Halligan what this means yet. I'm sure she is completely clueless.

 

[forkup]

Thank you!

That really sucks!

It is such a loophole for gov't to be able to extend a statutory time limit for an indictment...if it means how it reads or seems to mean...

All the gov't has to do is make mistakes purposely, to get the charges dismissed, and it buys them another 6 months to get prepared to indict again!

I understand the frustration but I want to push back a bit.

It's never a good idea to look at laws from what happens in extreme circumstances.

The DOJ is not supposed to operate this way and it usually doesn't. It's not really a loophole it's a way to prevent defendants to run out the clock on indictments by abusing the appeal process or getting of on an honest but benign mistake from the prosecutor.

I also would take heart out of the following. The facts of this indictment were so flimsy Halligan despite lying about the law to the GJ only succeeded to convince 14 out of 23 people to approve 2 of the 3 charges, this while she was the only one presenting the case, no judge, no defense lawyer.

I find it highly unlikely that a different prosecutor will fare any better and the chance that they'll be able to convict near nil.

My biggest regret is that this means it's likely all the misconduct of Halligan now becomes harder to prove because the case as it is now is likely dead. And I would have enjoyed her trying to defend all this in front of the bar.

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[struth]

Is correction, the technically doesn’t change the facts of the case and erase the illegal criminal acts of these dembots

 

[jknowgood]

loser said what?

Just tap out man...you lost.

I see James is looking at 30 years. I haven't lost, you loons have.