Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed

[Darkwind]

What was dismissed then?

The authority of the prosecutor to be in that role. The charges get dismissed without prejudice, which means that those charges can be filed against them both again by another prosecutor.

 

[candycorn]

I see James is looking at 30 years. I haven't lost, you loons have.

I'll be happy to remind you of what a loser you are when the case gets dismissed again. Deal?

 

[candycorn]

The authority of the prosecutor to be in that role. The charges get dismissed without prejudice, which means that those charges can be filed against them both again by another prosecutor.

Yeah, the blob won't make the same mistake again. He'll go with a brunette this time. It will have the same result but it will be a different way to go.

I wonder if anyone explained what the ruling meant to Hollandaise or whatever the bimbo's name was who botched it. LOL

 

[Darkwind]

Yeah, the blob won't make the same mistake again. He'll go with a brunette this time. It will have the same result but it will be a different way to go.

I wonder if anyone explained what the ruling meant to Hollandaise or whatever the bimbo's name was who botched it. LOL

It was a shit ruling TBH. She was legally appointed, but the Senate screwed up by not getting that confirmation done. That rests on Thune's desk.

 

[JoeB131]

The dismissal was based on the appointment of the Prosecutor. The charges were not set aside, so that means that another prosecutor can still bring the charges.

Except other prosecutors refused to bring these charges, this is why Trump appointed Hooligan to start with.

 

[Hafar1014]

Except other prosecutors refused to bring these charges, this is why Trump appointed Hooligan to start with.

It will be appealed and a real judge will hear the case.

 

[JoeB131]

It will be appealed and a real judge will hear the case.

Sounds like a real judge heard it.

Of course, this indictment had so many other problems, like the Grand Jury never voting on it, or information being withheld.

Trump should take the L and move on.

 

[Darkwind]

Except other prosecutors refused to bring these charges, this is why Trump appointed Hooligan to start with.

When those charges are brought, I'd rub it in your face, but you have no moral compass to feel shame.

There is a saying, "Wait and see".

The appeal has already been filed.

 

[struth]

Except other prosecutors refused to bring these charges, this is why Trump appointed Hooligan to start with.

Um, it's obvious you don't understand basic civics. The prosecutor, or prosecutors don't bring the indictment....a grand jury did. Obviously, there was evidence to support the indictment, since a grand jury of their peers brought it.

The ruling here doesn't change the facts of the cases against these scumbags.

 

[Hafar1014]

Sounds like a real judge heard it.

Of course, this indictment had so many other problems, like the Grand Jury never voting on it, or information being withheld.

Trump should take the L and move on.

Comey is on the record for perjury. He also has to answer for investigating Republicans. Its far from over for him.

 

[jknowgood]

I'll be happy to remind you of what a loser you are when the case gets dismissed again. Deal?

They just refused dropping her case and it's going to proceed. Hopefully she has a big dose of karma coming and she also gets tried in a red state. That way she can feel the bias Trump felt.

 

[forkup]

Comey is on the record for perjury. He also has to answer for investigating Republicans. Its far from over for him.

Only on your fever brain.

Since you and struth seem to call for "the facts of the case" let me give some.

Comey was charged with perjury on the question of him authorizing anyone at the FBI to leak to the press. As proof of this they claim that Dan Richman leaked information to the press. Something they tried to charge Richman for under Bill Barr but it was ultimately dropped then.

Thing is Dan Richman didn't work AT THE FBI at the time of the leak. So even IF you can prove Comey leaked anything, his answer would still be truthful.

 

[Hafar1014]

Only on your fever brain.

Since you and struth seem to call for "the facts of the case" let me give some.

Comey was charged with perjury on the question of him authorizing anyone at the FBI to leak to the press. As proof of this they claim that Dan Richman leaked information to the press. Something they tried to charge Richman for under Bill Barr but it was ultimately dropped then.

Thing is Dan Richman didn't work AT THE FBI at the time of the leak. So even IF you can prove Comey leaked anything, his answer would still be truthful.

It will be appealed. Comey deserves to go down for corrupting the FBI.

 

[struth]

Only on your fever brain.

Since you and struth seem to call for "the facts of the case" let me give some.

Comey was charged with perjury on the question of him authorizing anyone at the FBI to leak to the press. As proof of this they claim that Dan Richman leaked information to the press. Something they tried to charge Richman for under Bill Barr but it was ultimately dropped then.

Thing is Dan Richman didn't work AT THE FBI at the time of the leak. So even IF you can prove Comey leaked anything, his answer would still be truthful.

That's not the facts of the case. He was also never charged with perjury

Try again dembot

 

[forkup]

Um, it's obvious you don't understand basic civics. The prosecutor, or prosecutors don't bring the indictment....a grand jury did. Obviously, there was evidence to support the indictment, since a grand jury of their peers brought it.

The ruling here doesn't change the facts of the cases against these scumbags.

Do you understand that approving an indictment is done by simple majority. In a room that only has the GJ, the prosecutor and someone to take minutes present. That there is no defense counsel, or judge. That the standard for approving an indictment is simply probable cause. Meaning the possibility a crime was committed is enough. Are you aware a judge who looked at those minutes all but said Halligan lied about applicable law.

And that despite all that all she managed was getting 2 of 3 approved by securing only 14 of 23 jurors.

Since you like "facts of the case"

 

[Hafar1014]

That's not the facts of the case. He was also never charged with perjury

Try again dembot

HIs problems are just beginning. Paybacks are a *****.

 

[struth]

Do you understand that approving an indictment is done by simple majority. In a room that only has the GJ, the prosecutor and someone to take minutes present. That there is no defense counsel, or judge. That the standard for approving an indictment is simply probable cause. Meaning the possibility a crime was committed is enough. Are you aware a judge who looked at those minutes all but said Halligan lied about applicable law.

And that despite all that all she managed was getting 2 of 3 approved by securing only 14 of 23 jurors.

Since you like "facts of the case"

What's your point about the number of votes? Yes, I know what a Grand Jury is. It's not a trial, it's just hearing the states evidence and determining if there is enough evidence to move forward and indict

The Grand Jury said there was in these cases, not the prosecutor.

 

[forkup]

It will be appealed. Comey deserves to go down for corrupting the FBI.

It might be appealed. Won't change anything.

In the end, best case scenario for Halligan is that it's dropped because if they prevail on appeal and it comes back to the judge actually adjudicating on the case it will be dismissed with prejudice for about 2 dozen reasons and likely will end up in disciplinary actions against her.

And unlike your claims I can tell you exactly why.to.

 

[struth]

It might be appealed. Won't change anything.

In the end, best case scenario for Halligan is that it's dropped because if they prevail on appeal and it comes back to the judge actually adjudicating on the case it will be dismissed with prejudice for about 2 dozen reasons and likely will end up in disciplinary actions against her.

And unlike your claims I can tell you exactly why.to.

Why would she want a bench trial instead of a jury trial?

 

[forkup]

What's your point about the number of votes? Yes, I know what a Grand Jury is. It's not a trial, it's just hearing the states evidence and determining if there is enough evidence to move forward and indict

The Grand Jury said there was in these cases, not the prosecutor.

But the prosecutor is their legal counsel in this context. And again that legal counsel lied to them when they asked questions .

And what my point is, is that you are convinced Comey is guilty because of the "facts of the case" despite the fact that Halligan wasn't able to convince a full Grand Jury under the probable cause standard of that guilt. She barely managed a majority for only 2 of the charges.And this despite misinforming them.