Sowing doubt and dissent is all you do."Free speech" is out the window when you're sowing doubt and dissent in the ranks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sowing doubt and dissent is all you do."Free speech" is out the window when you're sowing doubt and dissent in the ranks.
It must have been put up by a bunch of evil commies who were paid by Soros and Hillary and Pelosi and Biden and Hitler and Satan and Elvis!Gee...
..... ..... ..... Where and who would have put up such as stupid plaque.
WW
.

He is inciting insubordination.
You can follow the case at the first link. The actual filing is the second link.
Capt. Kelly (USN, Ret.) and current US Senator is bringing action against SecDef Hegseth on 6 principle grounds which can be addressed in Federal Courts outside the military structure:
- First Amendment,
- Speech or Debate Clause,
- Separation of Powers,
- Due Process,
- 10 U.S.C. § 1370,
- Administrative Procedure Act.
First Amendment is pretty obvious.
Speech and Debate Clause - prevents actions against members of Congress for political speech.
Separation of Powers - the Executive branch is attempting to interfer with/punish a member of the Legislative Branch from communicating with constituants.
Due Process - Capt. Kelly was never allowed to respond to charges and the outcome of the "investigation" was predetermined based on political powers and statements clearly in the public record. A pre-determined outcome vioates due process.
10 U.S.C. § 1370 - Govern's final grade determination for military officers and that is a decision that is made at the time of retirement and for conduct while on active duty. That 1370 does not allow for reopening final grade determination and for speech after (many years after) retirement. There have been cases where retired member were recalled for disciplinary action, but - IIRC - those cases were about conduct prior to retirement that came to light after retirement.
Administrative Procedures Act - to quote from the filing: "Under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), courts shall “hold unlawful and set aside agency action” that is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)." Bascially that there was no "procedure" used, that the outcome was predetermined and retaliation.
WW
What illegal order was he talking about?Senator Kelly said nothing treasonous nor seditious. Service members do not have to obey illegal orders, pure and simple.
You haven't seen it?
WW
.
.
.
He's still under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ....that's why the other seditious hack hasn't been censured.Except of course, he is: 1) not in the military; 2) he is a member of Congress; 3) he said the exact same thing as the Dec of Defense; 4) he literally recited military law.
The most false of false equivalences.
What was Hegseth's position then?
Congressman?...Senator?...Mayor?...Dog catcher?
Oh...So on duty and giving instruction to men under his command.Major, United States Army
WW
Kelly isn’t being prosecuted under the UCMJ. Hegseth is trying a unilateral administrative move without any due process.He's still under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ....that's why the other seditious hack hasn't been censured.
Hegseth was in no position to be of any influence to anyone when he said what he did.
What was the illegal order Kelly and other morons were talking about?Kelly isn’t being prosecuted under the UCMJ. Hegseth is trying a unilateral administrative move without any due process.
What illegal order was he talking about?
When asked what illegal order Trump gave not one of them answer the questionAny illegal order actually. Being ordered kill unarmed civilian non-combatants is an illegal order, Being order to destroy homes is an illegal order. My Lai comes to mind.
Oh...So on duty and giving instruction to men under his command.
As opposed to a retired political ******* hack, seeking to sow doubt in the ranks.
Glad we cleared that up.
Oh...So on duty and giving instruction to men under his command.
As opposed to a retired political ******* hack, seeking to sow doubt in the ranks.
Glad we cleared that up.
Senator Kelly was NOT "On Duty". He correctly stated no member of the United States Military could forced, intimidated or coerced into obeying an Illegal Order. At no time did Senator engage traitorous or seditious language. Under the First Amendment he has right to inform service members of their duty, that is all he did.
Why would you say that about Lesh? (Lush!)Excellent. Good for Kelly. Go after the drunk.