Can we allow Europe to be brought under Russian domination?

[Seymour Flops]

If the alternative is the U.S. fighting yet another war in Europe, I say yes.

Europe has a bizarre love affair with socialism. They ridicule the U.S. for not having enough of it. Self hating Americans join in.

Now they may be confronted with socialism's inevitable end game: to run out of material to steal at home and begin taking over territory not yet bled dry by the looting. They love socialism? Well here's a genuine KGB man to bring it to them.

Let Europeans have what they want, servility and dependance. Let us open our own resources back up and tend to our own business.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Before we get rid of socialists in Europe we need to get rid of socialists here.

 

[TNHarley]

Fuck Europe. Bunch of authoritarian shit stains

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Europe is the Bruce Jenner of continents.

All of Europe could turn in Rabbits tomorrow and we would be just fine.

Outside of wine, and the occasional football game Europe produces exactly fuck all for me.

They are deballed, pussies who are a shell of their formerly, very cool selves.

They used to be real men but now they are "Shocked!" by meany words, and "brutalized" by contravening ideas which stimulate hate!

FAGGOTS.

Have it all Vlad.

 

[MarcATL]

lol

 

[task0778]

Europe is in no danger whatsoever from being conquered by Russia. The Russian military is not as robust as many seem to think, and both sides would be utterly destroyed. And everybody knows it over there on both sides.

 

[excalibur]

Europe has a far bigger GDP than Russia, with more people. It isn't 1947 anymore and they should be spending far more of their own defense.

Meanwhile, we need to pivot towards Asia, which was the Trump policy, and the reason he loathed NATO was the failure of numerous NATO countries to even spend a mere 2% on defense which 2% is the NATO minimum recommended.

Germany is the second biggest shirker in NATO.

Canada is the biggest shirker in NATO.

 

[task0778]

Meanwhile, we need to pivot towards Asia, which was the Trump policy, and the reason he loathed NATO was the failure of numerous NATO countries to even spend a mere 2% on defense which 2% is the NATO minimum recommended.

Germany is the second biggest shirker in NATO.

Canad is the biggest shirker in NATO.

One hopes that will change with the recent war in Ukraine. At least for awhile.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Europe has a far bigger GDP than Russia, with more people. It isn't 1947 anymore and they should be spending far more of their own defense.

Meanwhile, we need to pivot towards Asia, which was the Trump policy, and the reason he loathed NATO was the failure of numerous NATO countries to even spend a mere 2% on defense which 2% is the NATO minimum recommended.

Germany is the second biggest shirker in NATO.

Canada is the biggest shirker in NATO.

We need to get out of NATO and world policing.

While everyone is wetting their panties over Ukraine and Taiwan our borders are porous, as our economic, and social issues are mounting.

I expect little more from Americans but it is time to start reversing the 'Cold War' brain washing.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Better Russian than Islamic or Chinese.

 

[B. Kidd]

If the alternative is the U.S. fighting yet another war in Europe, I say yes.

Europe has a bizarre love affair with socialism. They ridicule the U.S. for not having enough of it. Self hating Americans join in.

Now they may be confronted with socialism's inevitable end game: to run out of material to steal at home and begin taking over territory not yet bled dry by the looting. They love socialism? Well here's a genuine KGB man to bring it to them.

Let Europeans have what they want, servility and dependance. Let us open our own resources back up and tend to our own business.

Europe has breast-fed off the American taxpayer for 75 years since WWII for their defense instead of providing for themselves up to this day.

And now all of a sudden in an Acme F'in minute it's our problem??
Freeloading has consequences. Eurotrash needs to learn this!

 

[1srelluc]

Tough question, truth be told I'd rather see them at each other's throats.....Deserves has everything to do with it.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Europe is the Bruce Jenner of continents.

All of Europe could turn in Rabbits tomorrow and we would be just fine.

Outside of wine, and the occasional football game Europe produces exactly fuck all for me.

They are deballed, pussies who are a shell of their formerly, very cool selves.

They used to be real men but now they are "Shocked!" by meany words, and "brutalized" by contravening ideas which stimulate hate!

FAGGOTS.

Have it all Vlad.

If You Write Your Name in Snow, You're A-Peein'

Contrary to what we are led to expect, Socialism is an invention of Europe's hereditary upper-class. It has always been a scheme by one faction of spoiled youth to prevent being guillotined again by taking over democratic movements and pretending to lead them to power. Socialist dictatorship's hidden appeal is to entitled brats whose Daddies raised them to believe they were Born to Rule. Americans must rip this alien Birth-Class Supremacy out of our own laws and culture root and branch.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Better Russian than Islamic or Chinese.

Better Russian than democrat.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

If You Write Your Name in Snow, You're A-Peein'

Contrary to what we are led to expect, Socialism is an invention of Europe's hereditary upper-class. It has always been a scheme by one faction of spoiled youth to prevent being guillotined again by taking over democratic movements and pretending to lead them to power. Socialist dictatorship's hidden appeal is to entitled brats whose Daddies raised them to believe they were Born to Rule. Americans must rip this alien Birth-Class Supremacy out of our own laws and culture root and branch.

That is the GD truth.

Marx, and Engels both came from wealthy families.

Lenin came from an upper middle class background.

Mao did not come from poverty either.

Che, Ho-Chi Minh, etc.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

That is the GD truth.

Marx, and Engels both came from wealthy families.

Lenin came from an upper middle class background.

Mao did not come from poverty either.

Che, Ho-Chi Minh, etc.

A Product of a Sex Castle

Pol Pot was spoiled by his aunt, who was the King's favorite mistress and the most powerful woman in Cambodia.

 

[bendog]

If the alternative is the U.S. fighting yet another war in Europe, I say yes.

Europe has a bizarre love affair with socialism. They ridicule the U.S. for not having enough of it. Self hating Americans join in.

Now they may be confronted with socialism's inevitable end game: to run out of material to steal at home and begin taking over territory not yet bled dry by the looting. They love socialism? Well here's a genuine KGB man to bring it to them.

Let Europeans have what they want, servility and dependance. Let us open our own resources back up and tend to our own business.

Trump helping conservatives everywhere. No one this disputes. Where Natasha?

 

[Ame®icano]

If the alternative is the U.S. fighting yet another war in Europe, I say yes.

Europe has a bizarre love affair with socialism. They ridicule the U.S. for not having enough of it. Self hating Americans join in.

Now they may be confronted with socialism's inevitable end game: to run out of material to steal at home and begin taking over territory not yet bled dry by the looting. They love socialism? Well here's a genuine KGB man to bring it to them.

Let Europeans have what they want, servility and dependance. Let us open our own resources back up and tend to our own business.

Europe brought it on themselves.

Europe and US failed to deter Russia from invading Ukraine because the West is lost in soft renewable energy delusions, whilst Putin was grounded in hard physical reality of nuclear energy, oil, and natural gas. And now, Ukrainians are paying for our wishful thinking.

With an economy smaller that that of Texas, and average life expectancy ten years less than rest of Europe, how does he manage to launch unprovoked full scale attack on another country, how is he able to pull this off? Here is how... the first answer is mathematical, and second purely (ideo)logical.

He wants Ukraine to be part of Russia more than the West wants Ukraine to be free. Putin is willing to risk tremendous loss of life and resources to get what he wants. There are serious limits to how much the US and Europe are willing to do militarily and Putin knows it. Missing from that explanation thought is a story about material reality and basic economics.

Two things that Putin seems to understand far better than his counterparts in the free world and especially in Europe, first is that Europe produces 3.6 million barrel of oil a day but uses 15 million barrels of oil a day. Europe produces 230 billion cubic meters of natural gas a year, but uses 560 billion cubic meters a year. Europe uses 950 million tons of coal a year, and produces half of that. At the same time, Putin knows that Russia produces 11 million barrels of oil per day, but only uses 3.4 million barrels. Russia produces over 700 billion cubic meters of gas a year but only uses around 400 billion. Russia mines 800 million tons of coal each year, but uses 300 million tons. That's how Russia ends up supplying about 20% of Europe's oil, 45% of its gas and 20% of its coal. The math is simple, a child could do it, but none of the leaders on the West do.

The reason Europe doesn't have a muscular deterrent threat to prevent Russian aggression and in fact prevented the US from getting allies to do more, is that Europe desperately needs Russian oil and gas. How is it possible that European countries, Germany in particular, allow themselves to become as dependent on authoritarian country over the thirty years since the cold war ended? Well, these countries are in the grips of delusional leftist ideology that makes them incapable to understand the hard realities of energy production. Green ideology insist that we don't need nuclear, and we don't need fracking, it insist that it's just matter of will and money to switch to all renewables, it insists that we need to de-growth the economies, and that we are facing looming human extinction because of the climate change.

Than there is John Kerry, the guy who will only marry you if you are a widow with shitload of money, and he is the US "climate envoy". This guy is such a pseudointellectual, it's mind boggling. He perfectly captured myopia of the view that West holds, when he said two days before the war that "the Russian invasion of Ukraine could have profound effect... profound negative impact on the climate".

It's the West that focused on healing of the planet, soft energy renewables, and moving away from natural gas, and nuclear, that allowed Putin to gain stranglehold over Europe's energy supply. As the West fell into hypnotic trans about healing relationship with nature, averting climate apocalypse and worshipping Greta Turnberg, Putin made his moves. Whilst the expanded nuclear energy from Russia was kicking ass, Europe was shutting down their power plants and importing more and more gas. Western governments were spending their time and money obsessing over carbon footprints, (the term that was created by the advertising agency working for BP, they spend thousands of hours for climate anxiety therapy in order to ban plastic straws, whilst Putin expanded his oil and gas production and doubled his nuclear energy production to allow more exports of his other energy sources. Europe shut down their nuclear plants, closed their own gas fields and refused to develop advance methods of fracking.

The numbers tell the story the best, in 2016, only 30% of gas used by Europe came from Russia, in 2018 it jumped to 40%, by early 2020 it was 44% and by early 2021 it was 48%. Love him or hate him, Trump defied diplomatic protocols and called out Germany publicly in 2018 for its dependence on Moscow. He said that Germany is captive to Russia and he was right. At the time Angela Markel (former commie, by the way) was widely praised for her environmental conciseness, and just as socialist being wrong in just about everything, it turned out they didn't disappointed this time. She was saying that "Germany can make their own policies and decisions in regards energy" and the result is the worst energy crisis since 70's. These policies are driving price of all electricity and gasoline high around the world, and it's crisis fundamentally because of inadequate supply. The scarcity is entirely manufactured. The Europeans, led by figures like teenage idiot, who got rich of it, and green party leaders, supported by American idiots like John Kerry, believed that "heathy relationship with mother nature" requires to make energy scarce, but by turning completely to renewables, we are maybe saving a planet a little (which is questionable, given amount of energy needed to produce renewables), but we're completely destroying Ukraine by giving it to Russia. In service to green ideology, we made the perfect the enemy of the good, and the enemy of the people of Ukraine, and next potential victim country.

I'll continue with second reason in another post.

 

[Ame®icano]

The second reason you can find in Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin's writing, that Putin rejects everything related to globalism, on all levels: geopolitical and ideological.

"Russia rejects everything in globalism... unipolarism, atlantism, on the one hand, and liberalism, anti-tradition, technocracy, Grand Reset in one word, on the other. It is clear that all European leaders are part of the Atlantic liberal elite. In Ukraine, Russia is in war with them exactly, as they reacted exactly how liberals are expected to react. Russia is now excluded from the globalist networks, and has no choice anymore: either build her own world or disappear.

Russia has set a path to building its world, its civilization. And now the first step has been done. But sovereign in the face of globalism can only be a large space, a continent-state, a civilization-state. No country can withstand long a complete disconnect, and in order to prevent that, Russia is building a global resistance camp. If Putin succeed, that would be a victory for all the alternative forces, including everyone in a way of globalist agenda.

What does it mean for Russia to break up with the West? It is the salvation. The modern West, where Rothschild, Soros, Schwab, Bill Gates and Zuckerberg triumph, for Russia is the most disgusting thing in the history of the world. It is no longer the West of Greek-Romanian Mediterranean culture, nor the Christian Middle Ages, nor the violent and contradictory 20th century, and the sooner and more completely Russia is getting rid of it, the sooner it returns to its roots.

Dugin also said that Russia is out to defend traditional values against the modern world. It's just that "revert against the modern world". And Europe must break up with the West, and the United States must also follow those who reject globalism. Then everyone will understand the meaning of the modern war in Ukraine. Russian breakup with the West is not a breakup with Europe. It's a breakdown with death, degeneration and suicide. It's the key to recovery. And Europe itself - the European peoples - should follow their example: topple the anti-national globalist council. And building a real European house, a European building, a European cathedral."

Whether or not you're willing to admit it, what Russia is doing now is just the first step in the complete and utter annihilation of the New World Order you hate so much.

Dugin used to be one of Putin's advisers, I'm not sure if he still is. I don't like him because he's Bolshevik, or modern version of fascist, in the same way our liberal demagogues are. However, he is right in that there are larger forces at play in Ukraine, using it as a proxy battlefield. This is similar to what Putin said in his speech before the invasion, which many of us took lightly, accusing him of being revisionist.

I know, Putin speaking of restoring Russian empire and returning to traditional values is pretty odd, since Russians deviated from exactly that some 100+ years ago. I believe this has been cooking for years, they covered all fronts of the war, the propaganda, the ideological agenda, the rhetoric, everything to the detail that neither Europe or US are capable to do anything by force, anything but financially. And i think they're kind of ready for that too, since they're on their way to adopt gold standards.

 

[B. Kidd]

The second reason you can find in Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin's writing, that Putin rejects everything related to globalism, on all levels: geopolitical and ideological.



Dugin used to be one of Putin's advisers, I'm not sure if he still is. I don't like him because he's Bolshevik, or modern version of fascist, in the same way our liberal demagogues are. However, he is right in that there are larger forces at play in Ukraine, using it as a proxy battlefield. This is similar to what Putin said in his speech before the invasion, which many of us took lightly, accusing him of being revisionist.

I know, Putin speaking of restoring Russian empire and returning to traditional values is pretty odd, since Russians deviated from exactly that some 100+ years ago. I believe this has been cooking for years, they covered all fronts of the war, the propaganda, the ideological agenda, the rhetoric, everything to the detail that neither Europe or US are capable to do anything by force, anything but financially. And i think they're kind of ready for that too, since they're on their way to adopt gold standards.

And, they have China in their corner.