Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which is???All I saw was outrage and unsupported counter-accusations.
Curious, also, that "management" would lock that thread for the same violation that we all know has occurred here hundreds of times without notice.
What's the matter, Frankie Boy, afraid to post what was stated?
The outside temperature in Westchester county is -4
Old Rocks, Crick, please, please, please go fuck yourselves
And I have worked in -30 two differant days in the past years in Eastern Oregon. It's February, a winter month. As stated before, I think that 2015 is going to be a very interesting year.
Hey Neddi, how many scientists is that? i.e., the count.
If the science is settled that modern medicine is a good thing, why is medical research still going on? Frankie Boy, you ask the stupidest questions.
If the "Science" is "Settled" why are we still funding Global Warming "research"
Time to zero it out
If the "Science" is "Settled" why are we still funding Global Warming "research"
Time to zero it out
Who said the science was settled? That sentiment appeared no where in the Willie Soon article or here. Another false dilemma.
What's the matter, Frankie Boy, afraid to post what was stated?
So people actually involved doing the research should be banned from posting THEIR WORK because there might not be a link involved? Keep on posting your straw man arguments and I will keep batting them down with real science.For all, make damned sure that you post links to your sources. If you are someone with an education, and are pointing out the reality of what is happening, then your thread will be shut down. If you are a 'sceptic' you can post all the graphs and paragraphs you wish without links, no problem. Now that is an observable fact on this board. Just look at the posts of Elektra and Billy Bob.
Lets take this one step at a time and put the left wing crap to rest..Again, can anyone refute the contention that Willie Soon has been taking corporate payments in exchange for his opinion and hiding his sponsorship from journals in which he has been published? Anyone?
As old crock throws out bull shit because he can not refute what Soon and Monckton have done.. Old crock must resort to adhom attacks of their character. Speak to the science they show and grow up..Why no, they are not banned. They are exposed for the frauds that they are. Birds of a feather flock together. Monkton and Soon. Monkton, not a British Lord, and not a scientist.
Lets take this one step at a time and put the left wing crap to rest..
Dr Soon located grant funding as do all professionals in the research fields. The Smithsonian Staff did the paper work which included the need for a progress report, along with a 40-60% over head siphon of the funds to the Smithsonian. The Smithsonian was fully aware who the donor was and by contractual agreement, forbid the Smithsonian or Dr Soon to use the name of the donor, as is commonly done on both sides of the Isle.
The NY slimes article was factually incorrect as the Smithsonian was fully aware of all dealings and agreements. The letter by the Smithsonian is a smoke screen and deceitful as they were fully aware and were part of the grant receiving process. Anyone who thinks the Smithsonian was not informed is not informed. The grant process involves legal departments and agency heads.
I wonder when the left wing crap piles will fess up to their George Soros funded through multiple levels of groups and shadow organizations, who is pushing this socialist take over attempt. Or their special interest groups and corporate sponsors who are putting millions of dollars into democrat coffers after receiving special treatment and wavers from the Obama Administration..
The outright hypocrisy of the left is stunning to behold..
Lets take this one step at a time and put the left wing crap to rest..
Dr Soon located grant funding as do all professionals in the research fields. The Smithsonian Staff did the paper work which included the need for a progress report, along with a 40-60% over head siphon of the funds to the Smithsonian. The Smithsonian was fully aware who the donor was and by contractual agreement, forbid the Smithsonian or Dr Soon to use the name of the donor, as is commonly done on both sides of the Isle.
The NY slimes article was factually incorrect as the Smithsonian was fully aware of all dealings and agreements. The letter by the Smithsonian is a smoke screen and deceitful as they were fully aware and were part of the grant receiving process. Anyone who thinks the Smithsonian was not informed is not informed. The grant process involves legal departments and agency heads.
I wonder when the left wing crap piles will fess up to their George Soros funded through multiple levels of groups and shadow organizations, who is pushing this socialist take over attempt. Or their special interest groups and corporate sponsors who are putting millions of dollars into democrat coffers after receiving special treatment and wavers from the Obama Administration..
The outright hypocrisy of the left is stunning to behold..
How about a valid source for that information Billy? BTW, the issue was not whether or not the Smithsonian knew, it was whether or not Soon informed the journals in which he got his work published; the ones who might have been interested in a conflict of interest.
Instead, I simply let my title and the following excerpts from the so-called “supporting” documents offered by Greenpeace speak for themselves. Their [non-]journalist lackeys: Justin Gillis and John Schwartz of the NY Times, apparently didn’t actually read them – or they might have noticed that the contracts are between the Smithsonian (not Soon) and Southern and if they had stretched themselves, might have uncovered the definition of “deliverables”….I can’t believe Gillis and Schwartz allowed themselves to be duped again.
