Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
P01135809's crop of shysters are more the Keystone Cops. I mean lead is woman who reped for a parking garage. He also has a history of NOT paying his legal help just ask Ghouli, who was never paid. The lawyer who a million up front, dropped the case as fast as he could and kept the money.lol. Dipshits like you call Trump’s lawyers brilliant despite his abysmal record of winning in court.
Trump is quite used to being spanked by judges.
We both know that this is not an argument that his lawyers are making because they think it will succeed. The only purpose is delay.
The 5th Amendment, Simp.Cite the clause in The Constitution where your claim is outlined, assbreath.
You can't. FAIL.
Now repeat after me: "I WILL take my head out of Trump's ass in the hope that my brain can experience a recovery".
Keep repeating that until the thought takes hold.
The Judges in Colorado used the 14th Ammendment to ban your assbuddy, assface.Yawn. Try reading the entire 14th Amendment dumbfuck. The third section needs a conviction. Yes you are a failure. Now repeat this “Clipper is a dumbfuck incel who wants Donald Trump’s ass in the worst way.”. Continue your lifelong tantrum.
A mostly peaceful protest is not an insurrection, regardless of how many times you say it is. Propaganda parrot.
5 people died on Jan 6?140 police officers sent to hospital and 5 people dead is not a "mostly peaceful protest". Furthermore, we all watched it live on TV and it was ANYTHING but peaceful.
140 police officers were sent to the hospital in Jan 6?140 police officers sent to hospital and 5 people dead is not a "mostly peaceful protest". Furthermore, we all watched it live on TV and it was ANYTHING but peaceful.
Here is the third section of the 14th amendment. Please point out the part that says there needs to be a conviction….Yawn. Try reading the entire 14th Amendment dumbfuck. The third section needs a conviction. Yes you are a failure. Now repeat this “Clipper is a dumbfuck incel who wants Donald Trump’s ass in the worst way.”. Continue your lifelong tantrum.
I watched BLM riots all across the nation with a lot more cops hurt and billions in damage. Go fuck yourself.140 police officers sent to hospital and 5 people dead is not a "mostly peaceful protest". Furthermore, we all watched it live on TV and it was ANYTHING but peaceful.
And will get bitch slapped by SCOTUS, as they shove that crap decision right up YOUR backside you ass obsessed retard.The Judges in Colorado used the 14th Ammendment to ban your assbuddy, assface.
Put the clause up Trump's ass & go read it yourself.
Try reading the whole thing moron. Not that you’ll understand it. No charge and no conviction since Trump did not engage in those activities. If he did, where are the charges, trial, and conviction? That is a requirement here. Otherwise you can NOT claim Trump participated in anything described here. Watch this pathetic dodge....Here is the third section of the 14th amendment. Please point out the part that says there needs to be a conviction….
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Doing everything short of personally escorting Illegals with aWho's appealing the SCOTUS??????????
So Biden shouldn't be charged with TREASON for opening up the southern border?
You subverted morons are CRAZY
I watched BLM riots all across the nation with a lot more cops hurt and billions in damage. Go fuck yourself.
And YOU, Ms. Contrary pants, will be wagging you finger at the "patriots" as they are led into the box-cars.One was over an authoritarian government violating people's rights and the other was over a poor loser unable to accept defeat. They were not the same.
5 people died on Jan 6?
Got a link?
Watch the KKKanadian shitstain run away.
President Trump has First Amendment Rights to question the validity of the election, Ms. Contrary pants.Trump is arguing that as president he had immunity from election laws. He isn't even arguing he didn't try and interfere.
Again, Trump is arguing he was immune from the countries laws. Think about that. Someone arguing they are immune from laws.
Donald Trump on Saturday night urged a federal appeals court to dismiss special counsel Jack Smith’s criminal case against him for seeking to subvert the 2020 election, contending that he is “absolutely immune” from the charges because they related to his official duties as president.
In a 71-page opening brief filed with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Trump’s attorneys said the prosecution’s charges primarily focus on his efforts to lobby state and federal officials to reverse the election results, actions that they claim were within Trump’s official responsibilities to ensure the 2020 election was conducted fairly.
That argument has fared poorly in other federal courts that have considered it so far, as judges have distinguished between benign lobbying and the alleged criminal scheme to derail the transfer of power based on lies about election fraud.
Trump asks appeals court to block 2020 election prosecution
President Trump has First Amendment Rights to question the validity of the election, Ms. Contrary pants.
Awe, did he say something mean that hurt your feelz?He does. He doesn't have rights to threaten election officials or demean their reputations over his inability to accept he lost.
I post an opinion noting his problem with his argument and again you feel a proper rebuttal is name calling.
